IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i5p274-d1657369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rating Liberalization and Efficiency: Evidence from the Property-Liability Insurance Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ming-Kuo Chen

    (Department of Insurance and Finance Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan)

  • Chi-Hung Chang

    (Department of Insurance and Finance, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung 403027, Taiwan)

Abstract

The property-liability insurance market in Taiwan has implemented three-stage deregulation on rate-making since 2002. This research investigates whether the rating liberalization brought about improvements in efficiency and productivity of the property-liability insurance market. Using data on property-liability insurers in Taiwan over 2001 to 2019 and employing data envelopment analysis, we show that technical, cost, and revenue efficiencies have improved after rating liberalization. Post-liberalization productivity has improved as well, and the decomposition of productivity change demonstrates that change in technology contributes most to productivity improvement at the inception of liberalization, and the contribution of efficiency improvement follows when rating controls are further released. Further analyses reveal that technical and revenue efficiency rose in the third stage of liberalization and cost efficiency improved in the second and third stages. Our findings suggest that the removal of price controls creates an operating environment with less restrictions and thus favors progress in efficiency of the property-liability insurance market.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming-Kuo Chen & Chi-Hung Chang, 2025. "Rating Liberalization and Efficiency: Evidence from the Property-Liability Insurance Industry," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:274-:d:1657369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/274/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/274/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banker, Rajiv & Natarajan, Ram & Zhang, Daqun, 2019. "Two-stage estimation of the impact of contextual variables in stochastic frontier production function models using Data Envelopment Analysis: Second stage OLS versus bootstrap approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 368-384.
    2. Vivian Jeng & Gene C. Lai, 2005. "Ownership Structure, Agency Costs, Specialization, and Efficiency: Analysis of Keiretsu and Independent Insurers in the Japanese Nonlife Insurance Industry," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 72(1), pages 105-158, March.
    3. J. Cummins & Gregory Nini, 2002. "Optimal Capital Utilization by Financial Firms: Evidence from the Property-Liability Insurance Industry," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 21(1), pages 15-53, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin Lung Peng & Lih Ru Chen & Jennifer L. Wang & Larry Y. Tzeng, 2017. "Diversification Versus Strategic Focus: Evidence from Insurance Intermediaries in Taiwan," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 42(3), pages 530-555, July.
    2. Kaffash, Sepideh & Azizi, Roza & Huang, Ying & Zhu, Joe, 2020. "A survey of data envelopment analysis applications in the insurance industry 1993–2018," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 801-813.
    3. Leverty, J. Tyler & Grace, Martin F., 2010. "The robustness of output measures in property-liability insurance efficiency studies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1510-1524, July.
    4. J. Cummins & Xiaoying Xie, 2013. "Efficiency, productivity, and scale economies in the U.S. property-liability insurance industry," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 141-164, April.
    5. McShane, Michael K. & Cox, Larry A. & Butler, Richard J., 2010. "Regulatory competition and forbearance: Evidence from the life insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 522-532, March.
    6. Shim Jeungbo, 2017. "Does Diversification Drive Down Risk-adjusted Returns? A Quantile Regression Approach," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-32, July.
    7. Thomas Url, 2014. "Schwaches Wirtschaftswachstum dämpft 2013 Privatversicherungsgeschäft," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(9), pages 609-618, September.
    8. Daniel Attah-Kyei & Charles Andoh & Saint Kuttu, 2023. "Risk, technical efficiency and capital requirements of Ghanaian insurers," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Eri Nakamura, 2017. "How do governance factors affect inefficiency? Stochastic frontier analysis of public utility firms in Japan," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(3), pages 267-289, September.
    10. Tomislava Pavic Kramaric & Marko Miletic & Ivan Pavic, 2017. "Profitability Determinants of Insurance Markets in Selected Central and Eastern European Countries," International Journal of Economic Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 100-123, November.
    11. Şeremet, Gülizar Gülcan & Konca, Murat, 2024. "Technical efficiency and its determinants in healthcare systems of underdeveloped countries," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. Hongli Liu & Xiaoyu Yan & Jinhua Cheng & Jun Zhang & Yan Bu, 2021. "Driving Factors for the Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity in Technical Efficiency of China’s New Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Frederick, Joshua D. & Fung, Derrick W.H. & Yang, Charles C. & Yeh, Jason J.H., 2022. "Individual health insurance reforms in the U.S.: Expanding interstate markets, Medicare for all, or Medicaid for all?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 753-765.
    14. Dionne, Georges & Gagné, Robert & Nouira, Abdelhakim, 2007. "Determinants of insurers’ performance in risk pooling, risk management, and financial intermediation activities," Working Papers 07-4, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    15. Selim Mankaï & Aymen Belgacem, 2013. "Interactions Between Risk-Taking, Capital, and Reinsurance for Property-Liability Insurance Firms," EconomiX Working Papers 2013-23, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    16. Zainal Abidin, Fazlini, 2017. "The Impact Of Corporate Environmental Performance Of Market Risk On Tropicana Corporation Berhad," MPRA Paper 78620, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Ignacio Moreno & Purificación Parrado‐Martínez & Antonio Trujillo‐Ponce, 2020. "Economic crisis and determinants of solvency in the insurance sector: new evidence from Spain," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2965-2994, September.
    18. Chen-Ying Lee, 2014. "The Effects of Firm Specific Factors and Macroeconomics on Profitability of Property-Liability Insurance Industry in Taiwan," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(5), pages 681-691, May.
    19. Xie, Xiaoying, 2010. "Are publicly held firms less efficient? Evidence from the US property-liability insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1549-1563, July.
    20. Andre P. Liebenberg & David W. Sommer, 2008. "Effects of Corporate Diversification: Evidence From the Property–Liability Insurance Industry," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 75(4), pages 893-919, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:274-:d:1657369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.