IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i5p239-d1646358.html

Variational Autoencoders for Completing the Volatility Surfaces

Author

Listed:
  • Bienvenue Feugang Nteumagné

    (Department of Finance and Investment Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2038, South Africa
    The initial idea for this study was conceived by C.W.S, who also assisted in the early development of the concept alongside H.A.D. B.F.N. further developed the idea, conducted the research, and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to reviewing and refining the final version of the paper.)

  • Hermann Azemtsa Donfack

    (Department of Finance and Investment Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2038, South Africa
    The initial idea for this study was conceived by C.W.S, who also assisted in the early development of the concept alongside H.A.D. B.F.N. further developed the idea, conducted the research, and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to reviewing and refining the final version of the paper.)

  • Celestin Wafo Soh

    (Department of Finance and Investment Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2038, South Africa
    Department of Mathematics and Stantistical Sciences, College of Science Engineering and Technology, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
    The initial idea for this study was conceived by C.W.S, who also assisted in the early development of the concept alongside H.A.D. B.F.N. further developed the idea, conducted the research, and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to reviewing and refining the final version of the paper.)

Abstract

Variational autoencoders (VAEs) have emerged as a promising tool for modeling volatility surfaces, with particular significance for generating synthetic implied volatility scenarios that enhance risk management capabilities. This study evaluates VAE performance using synthetic volatility surfaces, chosen specifically for their arbitrage-free properties and clean data characteristics. Through a comprehensive comparison with traditional methods including thin-plate spline interpolation, parametric models (SABR and SVI), and deterministic autoencoders, we demonstrate that our VAE approach with latent space optimization consistently outperforms existing methods, particularly in scenarios with extreme data sparsity. Our findings show that accurate, arbitrage-free surface reconstruction is achievable using only 5% of the original data points, with errors 7–12 times lower than competing approaches in high-sparsity scenarios. We rigorously validate the preservation of critical no-arbitrage conditions through probability distribution analysis and total variance strip non-intersection tests. The framework we develop overcomes traditional barriers of limited market data by generating over 13,500 synthetic surfaces for training, compared to typical market availability of fewer than 100. These capabilities have important implications for market risk analysis, derivatives pricing, and the development of more robust risk management frameworks, particularly in emerging markets or for newly introduced derivatives where historical data are scarce. Our integration of machine learning with financial theory constraints represents a significant advancement in volatility surface modeling that balances statistical accuracy with financial relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Bienvenue Feugang Nteumagné & Hermann Azemtsa Donfack & Celestin Wafo Soh, 2025. "Variational Autoencoders for Completing the Volatility Surfaces," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:239-:d:1646358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takahashi, Shuntaro & Chen, Yu & Tanaka-Ishii, Kumiko, 2019. "Modeling financial time-series with generative adversarial networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 527(C).
    2. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    3. Matthias Fengler, 2009. "Arbitrage-free smoothing of the implied volatility surface," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 417-428.
    4. Bates, David S, 1996. "Jumps and Stochastic Volatility: Exchange Rate Processes Implicit in Deutsche Mark Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 9(1), pages 69-107.
    5. Shuaiqiang Liu & Cornelis W. Oosterlee & Sander M. Bohte, 2019. "Pricing Options and Computing Implied Volatilities using Neural Networks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Peter Christoffersen & Steven Heston & Kris Jacobs, 2009. "The Shape and Term Structure of the Index Option Smirk: Why Multifactor Stochastic Volatility Models Work So Well," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(12), pages 1914-1932, December.
    7. repec:bla:jfinan:v:53:y:1998:i:6:p:2059-2106 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Blanka Horvath & Aitor Muguruza & Mehdi Tomas, 2021. "Deep learning volatility: a deep neural network perspective on pricing and calibration in (rough) volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 11-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Pengshi & Lin, Yan & Yu, Xing & Liu, Guifang, 2025. "Does bid-ask spread explains the smile? On DVF and DML," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Federico M. Bandi & Nicola Fusari & Guido Gazzani & Roberto Ren`o, 2026. "Ultra-short-term volatility surfaces," Papers 2603.29430, arXiv.org.
    3. Hideharu Funahashi, 2026. "Deep learning for derivatives pricing: a comparative study of asymptotic and quasi-process corrections," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 357(1), pages 113-157, February.
    4. Ballotta, Laura & Rayée, Grégory, 2022. "Smiles & smirks: Volatility and leverage by jumps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 1145-1161.
    5. Yifan Ye & Zheqi Fan & Xinfeng Ruan, 2025. "Modeling the Implied Volatility Smirk in China: Do Non‐Affine Two‐Factor Stochastic Volatility Models Work?," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 612-636, June.
    6. Christoffersen, Peter & Heston, Steven & Jacobs, Kris, 2010. "Option Anomalies and the Pricing Kernel," Working Papers 11-17, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    7. Rehez Ahlip & Laurence A. F. Park & Ante Prodan, 2017. "Pricing currency options in the Heston/CIR double exponential jump-diffusion model," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(01), pages 1-30, March.
    8. Guo, Jingjun & Kang, Weiyi & Wang, Yubing, 2024. "Multi-perspective option price forecasting combining parametric and non-parametric pricing models with a new dynamic ensemble framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    9. Du Du & Dan Luo, 2019. "The Pricing of Jump Propagation: Evidence from Spot and Options Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2360-2387, May.
    10. Ioannis Kyriakou & Riccardo Brignone & Gianluca Fusai, 2024. "Unified Moment-Based Modeling of Integrated Stochastic Processes," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(4), pages 1630-1653, July.
    11. Michael C. Fu & Bingqing Li & Rongwen Wu & Tianqi Zhang, 2020. "Option Pricing Under a Discrete-Time Markov Switching Stochastic Volatility with Co-Jump Model," Papers 2006.15054, arXiv.org.
    12. Duosi Zheng & Hanzhong Guo & Yanchu Liu & Wei Huang, 2025. "Neural Jumps for Option Pricing," Papers 2506.05137, arXiv.org.
    13. Ying Chang & Yiming Wang & Sumei Zhang, 2021. "Option Pricing under Double Heston Jump-Diffusion Model with Approximative Fractional Stochastic Volatility," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, January.
    14. Takayuki Sakuma, 2026. "Differential Machine Learning for 0DTE Options with Stochastic Volatility and Jumps," Papers 2603.07600, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    15. Chulmin Kang & Wanmo Kang & Jong Mun Lee, 2017. "Exact Simulation of the Wishart Multidimensional Stochastic Volatility Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1190-1206, October.
    16. Gurdip Bakshi & Charles Cao & Zhaodong (Ken) Zhong, 2021. "Assessing models of individual equity option prices," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 1-28, July.
    17. Gero Junike & Konstantin Pankrashkin, 2021. "Precise option pricing by the COS method--How to choose the truncation range," Papers 2109.01030, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    18. Jiwook Yoo, 2025. "Joint calibration of the volatility surface and variance term structure," Papers 2509.08096, arXiv.org.
    19. F. Leung & M. Law & S. K. Djeng, 2024. "Deterministic modelling of implied volatility in cryptocurrency options with underlying multiple resolution momentum indicator and non-linear machine learning regression algorithm," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Shuaiqiang Liu & Anastasia Borovykh & Lech A. Grzelak & Cornelis W. Oosterlee, 2019. "A neural network-based framework for financial model calibration," Papers 1904.10523, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:239-:d:1646358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.