IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2023i1p3-d1303503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Should Cryptocurrencies Be Defined and Reported? An Exploratory Study of Accounting Professor Opinions

Author

Listed:
  • D. Larry Crumbley

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Texas A&M University—Corpus Christi, RELLIS Campus, 3100 TX-47, Bryan, TX 77807, USA)

  • Donald L. Ariail

    (Coles College of Business, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA)

  • Amine Khayati

    (Coles College of Business, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA)

Abstract

Crypto assets have upset the pillars of regulatory and centralized monetary policy, and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has been slow in developing a position on how to account for cryptocurrencies. Currently, there are many accounting, finance, and tax meanings of cryptocurrencies. The purpose of this study is to show the path FASB has taken to develop accounting standards for more than 20,000 crypto assets, outline the positions other authorities and agencies have taken, and discuss Central Bank Digital Currencies since the United States and other countries are considering replacing their fiat currency with a digital currency. Furthermore, the study presents insights from an exploratory survey of accounting faculty opinions on cryptocurrencies. The discussion of virtual currency regulatory and accounting treatments informs the development of a regulatory framework.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Larry Crumbley & Donald L. Ariail & Amine Khayati, 2023. "How Should Cryptocurrencies Be Defined and Reported? An Exploratory Study of Accounting Professor Opinions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:3-:d:1303503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/1/3/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/1/3/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boon Seng Tan & Kin Yew Low, 2017. "Bitcoin – Its Economics for Financial Reporting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(2), pages 220-227, June.
    2. Casey Watters, 2023. "Digital Gold or Digital Security? Unravelling the Legal Fabric of Decentralised Digital Assets," Commodities, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Bergner, Jason & Chen, Yining & Simerly, Melloney, 2022. "Accounting faculty’s pursuit of professional certifications: Pre- and post-terminal degree comparison," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parthajit Kayal & Purnima Rohilla, 2021. "Bitcoin in the economics and finance literature: a survey," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Nicolette Klopper & Sophia Magaretha Brink, 2023. "Determining the Appropriate Accounting Treatment of Cryptocurrencies Based on Accounting Theory," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Maghyereh, Aktham & Abdoh, Hussein, 2021. "Time–frequency quantile dependence between Bitcoin and global equity markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    4. Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Bouri, Elie & Roubaud, David & Kristoufek, Ladislav & Lucey, Brian, 2019. "Is Bitcoin a better safe-haven investment than gold and commodities?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 322-330.
    5. Alsalmi, Noora & Ullah, Subhan & Rafique, Muhammad, 2023. "Accounting for digital currencies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Erica Pimentel & Emilio Boulianne, 2020. "Blockchain in Accounting Research and Practice: Current Trends and Future Opportunities," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 325-361, December.
    7. Cynthia W. Cai & Martina K. Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K. Singh, 2019. "Machine Learning and Expert Judgement: Analyzing Emerging Topics in Accounting and Finance Research in the Asia–Pacific," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 55(4), pages 709-733, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:3-:d:1303503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.