IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i7p288-d851438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Services and Patient Satisfaction in IRAN during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Methodology Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Artificial Neural Network

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Mohammad Khansari

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Shahid Ashrafi Esfahani University, Isfahan 4999981799, Iran)

  • Farzin Arbabi

    (Department of Economics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1955847781, Iran)

  • Mir Hadi Moazen Jamshidi

    (Department of Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran P.O. Box 19395-3697, Iran)

  • Maryam Soleimani

    (Department of Management, Economics and Accounting, Payame Noor University, Tehran 1599959515, Iran)

  • Pejman Ebrahimi

    (Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify and classify the most important factors affecting patient satisfaction in the COVID-19 pandemic crisis considering economic effects. This is an analytical study using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method and ANN-MLP (Artificial neural network based on multilayer perceptron model as a supervised learning algorithm) as an innovative methodology. The questionnaire was completed by 72 healthcare experts (N = 72). The inter-class correlation (ICC) coefficient value was confirmed in terms of consistency to determine sampling reliability. The findings show that interpersonal care and organizational characteristics have the greatest and least influence, respectively. Furthermore, the observations confirm that the highest and lowest effective sub-criteria, respectively, are patient safety climate and accessibility. Based on the study’s objective and general context, it can be claimed that private hospitals outperformed public hospitals in terms of patient satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Focusing on performance sensitivity analysis shows that, among the proposed criteria to achieve the study objective, the physical environment criterion had the highest difference in private and public hospitals, followed by the interpersonal care criterion. Furthermore, we used a multilayer perceptron algorithm to assess the accuracy of the model and distinguish private and public hospitals as a novelty approach. Overfitting results in finding an MLP model which is reliable, and the accuracy of the model is acceptable.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Mohammad Khansari & Farzin Arbabi & Mir Hadi Moazen Jamshidi & Maryam Soleimani & Pejman Ebrahimi, 2022. "Health Services and Patient Satisfaction in IRAN during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Methodology Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Artificial Neural Network," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:288-:d:851438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/7/288/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/7/288/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Footman, Katharine & Roberts, Bayard & Mills, Anne & Richardson, Erica & McKee, Martin, 2013. "Public satisfaction as a measure of health system performance: A study of nine countries in the former Soviet Union," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 62-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Armenak Antinyan & Thomas Bassetti & Luca Corazzini & Filippo Pavesi, 2020. "Trust in the Healthcare System and COVID-19 Treatment in the Developing World. Survey and Experimental Evidence from Armenia," Working Papers 2020:10, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    2. Vakulenko Veronika & Mattei Giorgia, 2023. "Reforming the Public Sector in Eastern European and Former Soviet Union Countries: A Systematic Literature Review," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 55-79, June.
    3. Vladyslav Shovkovyi & Anastasiya Ivanova & Andreii Tarasenko, 2018. "Health in transitions: case of Republic of Moldova," Suchasni ekonomichni doslidzhennja, Kyiv School of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 51-63.
    4. Le, Nga & Groot, Wim & Tomini, Sonila & Tomini, Florian, 2018. "Health insurance and patient satisfaction: Evidence from the poorest regions of Vietnam," MERIT Working Papers 2018-040, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Joan Costa-Font & Gilberto Turati, 2018. "Regional healthcare decentralization in unitary states: equal spending, equal satisfaction?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 974-985, July.
    6. Wanwan Zheng & Yuqing Liang & Woon Seek Lee & Youngwook Ko, 2023. "The Mediation Effect of Perceived Attitudes toward Medical Service on the Association between Public Satisfaction with the Overall Medical Service and Self-Rated Health among the General Population in," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Olena Levenets & Tetiana Stepurko & Abel Polese & Milena Pavlova & Wim Groot, 2019. "Coping strategies of cancer patients in Ukraine," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1423-1438, October.
    8. repec:kse:modern:v:1:y:2018:i:1:p:51-63 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Habibov, Nazim & Cheung, Alex & Auchynnikava, Alena, 2017. "Does social trust increase willingness to pay taxes to improve public healthcare? Cross-sectional cross-country instrumental variable analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 25-34.
    10. Simone M Schneider, 2020. "Beyond endogeneity in analyses of public opinion: Evaluations of healthcare by the foreign born across 24 European countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Luck, J. & Peabody, J.W. & DeMaria, L.M. & Alvarado, C.S. & Menon, R., 2014. "Patient and provider perspectives on quality and health system effectiveness in a transition economy: Evidence from Ukraine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 57-65.
    12. Aida Isabel Tavares & Pedro Lopes Ferreira, 2020. "Public satisfaction with health system coverage, empirical evidence from SHARE data," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 229-249, September.
    13. Linghan Shan & Ye Li & Ding Ding & Qunhong Wu & Chaojie Liu & Mingli Jiao & Yanhua Hao & Yuzhen Han & Lijun Gao & Jiejing Hao & Lan Wang & Weilan Xu & Jiaojiao Ren, 2016. "Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Inpatient Care: Effects of Trust, Medical Insurance and Perceived Quality of Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Schneider, Simone M. & Popic, Tamara, 2018. "Cognitive determinants of healthcare evaluations – A comparison of Eastern and Western European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 269-278.
    15. Park, Kisoo & Park, Jumin & Kwon, Young Dae & Kang, Yoonjeong & Noh, Jin-Won, 2016. "Public satisfaction with the healthcare system performance in South Korea: Universal healthcare system," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(6), pages 621-629.
    16. Mihajlo Jakovljevic & Paula Odete Fernandes & João Paulo Teixeira & Nemanja Rancic & Yuriy Timofeyev & Vladimir Reshetnikov, 2019. "Underlying Differences in Health Spending Within the World Health Organisation Europe Region—Comparing EU15, EU Post-2004, CIS, EU Candidate, and CARINFONET Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Yuan, Yaqi, 2021. "Public satisfaction with health care system in 30 countries: The effects of individual characteristics and social contexts," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(10), pages 1359-1366.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:288-:d:851438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.