IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjopen/v5y2022i1p3-51d726715.html

Formalising the R of Reduce in a Circular Economy Oriented Design Methodology for Pedestrian and Cycling Bridges

Author

Listed:
  • Kostas Anastasiades

    (Energy and Materials in Infrastructure and Buildings (EMIB), Faculty of Applied Engineering, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Thijs Lambrechts

    (Energy and Materials in Infrastructure and Buildings (EMIB), Faculty of Applied Engineering, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
    Innovative Structural Design, Structural Engineering and Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Jaan Mennes

    (Energy and Materials in Infrastructure and Buildings (EMIB), Faculty of Applied Engineering, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Amaryllis Audenaert

    (Energy and Materials in Infrastructure and Buildings (EMIB), Faculty of Applied Engineering, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Johan Blom

    (Energy and Materials in Infrastructure and Buildings (EMIB), Faculty of Applied Engineering, University of Antwerp, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

The construction industry consumes over 32% of the annually excavated natural resources worldwide. Additionally, it is responsible for 25% of the annually generated solid waste. To become a more sustainable industry, a circular economy is necessary: resources are kept in use as long as possible, aiming to reduce and recirculate natural resources. In this paper, the investigation focuses on pedestrian truss bridges of the types Warren and Howe. Many pedestrian bridges currently find themselves in their end-of-life phase and most commonly these bridges are demolished and rebuilt, thus needing a lot of new materials and energy. The aim is thus first and foremost to reduce the amount of necessary new materials. For this reason, a design tool will be created, using the software ‘Matlab’, in which truss bridges can be evaluated and compared in the conceptual design stage. The tool is based on the theory of morphological indicators: the volume indicator, displacement indicator, buckling indicator and first natural frequency indicator. These allow a designer to determine the most material efficient Warren or Howe truss bridge design with user-defined constraints concerning deflection, load frequency, buckling and overall dimension. Subsequently, the tool was tested and compared to calculations made in the finite element modelling software Diamonds. In total, 72 steel bridge structures were tested. From these it could be concluded that the manual calculations in Diamonds in general confirmed the results obtained with the automated design tool based on morphological indicators. As such, it allows a designer to converge more quickly towards the best performing structure, thus saving time, materials, and corresponding costs and energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Kostas Anastasiades & Thijs Lambrechts & Jaan Mennes & Amaryllis Audenaert & Johan Blom, 2022. "Formalising the R of Reduce in a Circular Economy Oriented Design Methodology for Pedestrian and Cycling Bridges," J, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjopen:v:5:y:2022:i:1:p:3-51:d:726715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8800/5/1/3/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8800/5/1/3/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vicent Penadés-Plà & Tatiana García-Segura & José V. Martí & Víctor Yepes, 2016. "A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Anastasiades, K. & Blom, J. & Buyle, M. & Audenaert, A., 2020. "Translating the circular economy to bridge construction: Lessons learnt from a critical literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valeria Gozzi & Leidy Guante Henriquez, 2025. "Integrating Sustainability Indicators in Conceptual Design of Footbridges: A Decision-Support Framework for Environmental, Economic, and Structural Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajayi, V. & Pollitt, M .G., 2022. "Green growth and net zero policy in the UK: some conceptual and measurement issues," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2255, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Malik, Ashish & Sharma, Piyush & Sharma, Piyush & Vinu, Ajayan & Karakoti, Ajay & Kaur, Kamalpreet & Gujral, Harpreet Singh & Munjal, Surender & Laker, Benjamin, 2022. "Circular economy adoption by SMEs in emerging markets: Towards a multilevel conceptual framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 605-619.
    3. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    4. Tina Wiegand & Martin Wynn, 2023. "Sustainability, the Circular Economy and Digitalisation in the German Textile and Clothing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, June.
    5. Roberta De Angelis & Robert Morgan & Luigi M. De Luca, 2023. "Open strategy and dynamic capabilities: A framework for circular economy business models research," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4861-4873, November.
    6. Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Ren, Shuang & Richey, Robert Glenn, 2025. "Leveraging artificial intelligence to facilitate green servitization: Resource orchestration and Re-institutionalization perspectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    7. German Arana‐Landin & Waleska Sigüenza & Beñat Landeta‐Manzano & Iker Laskurain‐Iturbe, 2024. "Circular economy: On the road to ISO 59000 family of standards," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1977-2009, May.
    8. Dzintra Atstaja & Inga Liepa & Aivars Vembris & Baiba Rivza & Sanita Osipova & Natalija Cudecka-Purina, 2025. "Circular Economy Index: A New Methodology for Evaluating Circularity in Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Siamand Hesami, 2026. "Tax, Tech, and Trash: Synergies in Circular Economy Transitions," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Marianne Kuhlmann & Catharina R. Bening & Volker H. Hoffmann, 2023. "How incumbents realize disruptive circular innovation ‐ Overcoming the innovator's dilemma for a circular economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1106-1121, March.
    11. Abdulmajeed Almadhi & Abdelhakim Abdelhadi & Rakan Alyamani, 2023. "Moving from Linear to Circular Economy in Saudi Arabia: Life-Cycle Assessment on Plastic Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Hu, Xueyue & Wang, Chunying & Elshkaki, Ayman, 2024. "Material-energy Nexus: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Sergio Cappucci & Serena Nappi & Andrea Cappelli, 2022. "Green Public Areas and Urban Open Spaces Management: New GreenCAL Tool Algorithms and Circular Economy Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    14. Qiuzhen Ren & Jinkai Li & Johan Albrecht, 2025. "Toward circular economy: Implementing circular economy strategies to reduce carbon emissions in Chinese cities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 914-931, January.
    15. Monia Niero & Charlotte L. Jensen & Chiara Farné Fratini & Jens Dorland & Michael S. Jørgensen & Susse Georg, 2021. "Is life cycle assessment enough to address unintended side effects from Circular Economy initiatives?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1111-1120, October.
    16. Flavio Eduardo Fava & Lucílio Rogério Aparecido Alves & Thiago Libório Romanelli, 2025. "Economic Feasibility and Decarbonization Incentives of Sugarcane Biogas Production Pathways," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Ka Yin Chau & Tian Huang & Massoud Moslehpour & Waqas Khan & Qasim Ali Nisar & Muhammad Haris, 2024. "Opening a new horizon in green HRM practices with big data analytics and its analogy to circular economy performance: an empirical evidence," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 12133-12162, May.
    18. Mango, Francisco & Vincent, Rose Camille, 2025. "Does polycentric climate governance drive the circular economy? Evidence from subnational spending and dematerialization of production in the EU," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    19. Thomas Dobbelstein & Carina Lochner, 2023. "Factors influencing purchase intention for recycled products: A comparative analysis of Germany and South Africa," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2256-2277, August.
    20. Nguyen-Tien, Viet & Dai, Qiang & Harper, Gavin D.J. & Anderson, Paul A. & Elliott, Robert J.R., 2022. "Optimising the geospatial configuration of a future lithium ion battery recycling industry in the transition to electric vehicles and a circular economy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjopen:v:5:y:2022:i:1:p:3-51:d:726715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.