IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v9y2012i4p1135-1158d16932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suicide Methods in Asia: Implications in Suicide Prevention

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Chien-Chang Wu

    (Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, 2F Medical Humanity Building, No. 1, Section 1, Ren-Ai Road, Zhong Zheng District, Taipei 10051, Taiwan
    Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 1, Changde Street, Zhong Zheng District, Taipei 10048, Taiwan)

  • Ying-Yeh Chen

    (Taipei City Psychiatric Center, Taipei City Hospital, 309 Songde Road, XinYi District, Taipei 11080, Taiwan
    Institute of Public Health and Department of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, No. 155, Section 2, Linong Street, Bei Tou District, Taipei 11221, Taiwan)

  • Paul S. F. Yip

    (Department of Social Work and Social Administration, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
    Hong Kong Jockey Club Center for Suicide Research and Prevention, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong)

Abstract

As the largest continent in the World, Asia accounts for about 60% of World suicides. Preventing suicide by restricting access to suicide methods is one of the few evidence-based suicide prevention strategies. However, there has been a lack of systematic exploration of suicide methods in Asian countries. To amend this shortage, the current review examines the leading suicide methods in different Asian countries, their trend, their age- and sex- specific characteristics, and their implications for suicide prevention. In total, 42 articles with leading suicide methods data in 17 Asian countries/regions were retrieved. The epidemiologic characteristics and recent trends of common suicide methods reflect specific socio-cultural, economic, and religious situations in the region. Common suicide methods shift with the introduction of technologies and constructions, and have specific age- or sex-characteristics that may render the restriction of suicide methods not equally effective for all sex and age sub-groups. Charcoal burning, pesticide poisoning, native plant poisoning, self-immolation, and jumping are all prominent examples. In the information society, suicide prevention that focuses on suicide methods must monitor and control the innovation and spread of knowledge and practices of suicide “technologies”. It may be more cost-effective to design safety into technologies as a way of suicide prevention while there is no rash of suicides yet by the new technologies. Further research on suicide methods is important for public health approaches to suicide prevention with sensitivity to socio-cultural, economic, and religious factors in different countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Chien-Chang Wu & Ying-Yeh Chen & Paul S. F. Yip, 2012. "Suicide Methods in Asia: Implications in Suicide Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:4:p:1135-1158:d:16932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/4/1135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/4/1135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajdacic-Gross, V. & Killias, M. & Hepp, U. & Gadola, E. & Bopp, M. & Lauber, C. & Schnyder, U. & Gutzwiller, F. & Rössler, W., 2006. "Changing times: A longitudinal analysis of international firearm suicide data," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(10), pages 1752-1755.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noelia Lucía Martínez-Rives & Bibha Dhungel & Pilar Martin & Stuart Gilmour, 2021. "Method-Specific Suicide Mortality Trends in Australian Men from 1978 to 2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Aruna Jha & Manik Ahuja & Rajvi J. Wani, 2022. "Suicide Among South Asians in the United States: A Growing Public Health Problem," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christine Neill, 2010. "Do Gun Buybacks Save Lives? Evidence from Panel Data," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 12(2), pages 462-508.
    2. Julie Phillips, 2013. "Factors Associated With Temporal and Spatial Patterns in Suicide Rates Across U.S. States, 1976–2000," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(2), pages 591-614, April.
    3. Balestra, Simone, 2018. "Gun prevalence and suicide," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 163-177.
    4. Finn Gjertsen & Antoon Leenaars & Margarete E. Vollrath, 2013. "Mixed Impact of Firearms Restrictions on Fatal Firearm Injuries in Males: A National Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Wolfgang Stroebe, 2014. "Firearm possession and violent death: A critical review," CREMA Working Paper Series 2014-07, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    6. Steffen Hurka & Christoph Knill, 2020. "Does regulation matter? A cross‐national analysis of the impact of gun policies on homicide and suicide rates," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 787-803, October.
    7. Marco Sarchiapone & Laura Mandelli & Miriam Iosue & Costanza Andrisano & Alec Roy, 2011. "Controlling Access to Suicide Means," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Florentine, Julia Buus & Crane, Catherine, 2010. "Suicide prevention by limiting access to methods: A review of theory and practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1626-1632, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:4:p:1135-1158:d:16932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.