IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i4p492-d1377655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Development of an Oral Health Nursing Tool for Patients with a Psychotic Disorder: A Human-Centred Design with a Feasibility Test

Author

Listed:
  • Sonja Kuipers

    (Research Group Healthcare & Innovation in Psychiatry, Department of Healthcare, NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences, Rengerslaan 8-10, 8900 CG Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
    Department of Experimental Psychopathology and Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Stynke Castelein

    (Department of Experimental Psychopathology and Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands
    Lentis Research, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Hereweg 80, 9725 AG Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Linda Kronenberg

    (Dimence Mental Health Care, Burgemeester Roelenweg 9, 8021 EV Zwolle, The Netherlands)

  • Job van ’t Veer

    (Research Group Digital Innovation in Care and Welfare, Department of Healthcare, NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences, Rengerslaan 8-10, 8900 CG Leeuwarden, The Netherlands)

  • Nynke Boonstra

    (Research Group Healthcare & Innovation in Psychiatry, Department of Healthcare, NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences, Rengerslaan 8-10, 8900 CG Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
    KieN Early Intervention Service, Oosterkade 72, 8911 KJ Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
    UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Patients with psychotic disorders frequently report oral health problems, while mental health nurses (MHNs) seem not to be fully aware of these problems and the risk factors. Therefore, this study aimed to develop supportive tools for MHNs regarding oral health to increase sensitisation among MHNs and provide MHNs with the knowledge to recognise (potential) oral health problems in patients with a psychotic disorder. We used a human-centred design in which the user, MHNs and experts by experience were placed at the centre of the research process. Problems and needs in MHNs working with patients with a psychotic disorder were addressed. To identify key issues of problems as well as needs in terms of resources, we started with focus groups ( n = 9). We analysed the data thematically based on the context of patients and MHNs in practice regarding oral health, preferred oral health tools focused on MHNs, and the intended outcomes of tools. A multi-criteria decision matrix was developed and analysed ( n = 9) to identify the most optimal and viable solution based on established criteria and issues that are prevalent in the work of MHNs. The most promising result was the development of a brochure with an awareness screener. The brochure with the awareness screener was developed as a low-fidelity prototype for MHNs regarding oral health in patients with a psychotic disorder based on the latest scientific evidence. After testing it, the feasibility was tested through semi-structured interviews ( n = 19). MHNs and experts by experience were satisfied with the tool and provided recommendations for adjustments to the content. Significant augmentations to the brochure included a clinical lesson and a toothbrush with toothpaste for patients. We can conclude that a brochure with an awareness screener is feasible for MHNs. Future steps aiming to further refine and optimise care processes for oral health tools in MHNs should take refining eligibility criteria for psychiatric populations and the language level of the target group of a tool into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonja Kuipers & Stynke Castelein & Linda Kronenberg & Job van ’t Veer & Nynke Boonstra, 2024. "The Development of an Oral Health Nursing Tool for Patients with a Psychotic Disorder: A Human-Centred Design with a Feasibility Test," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-28, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:4:p:492-:d:1377655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/4/492/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/4/492/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Kuipers & Stynke Castelein & Linda Kronenberg & Job van ’t Veer & Nynke Boonstra, 2023. "A Human-Centered Design Approach to Develop Oral Health Nursing Interventions in Patients with a Psychotic Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-27, February.
    2. George W. Torrance & David Feeny & William Furlong, 2001. "Visual Analog Scales," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 21(4), pages 329-334, August.
    3. Kevin Marsh & Tereza Lanitis & David Neasham & Panagiotis Orfanos & Jaime Caro, 2014. "Assessing the Value of Healthcare Interventions Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Review of the Literature," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 345-365, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Wahlqvist & Gordon Guyatt & David Armstrong & Alessio Degl’Innocenti & Diane Heels-Ansdell & Samer El-Dika & Ingela Wiklund & Carlo Fallone & Lisa Tanser & Sander Zanten & Peggy Austin & Alan Ba, 2007. "The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (WPAI-GERD)," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 385-396, May.
    2. Brian Reddy & Praveen Thokala & Alison Iliff & Kerry Warhurst & Helen Chambers & Lynsey Bowker & Stephen J. Walters & Alejandra Duenas & Michael P. Kelly, 2016. "Using MCDA to generate and interpret evidence to inform local government investment in public health," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(3), pages 161-181, November.
    3. Mónica D. Oliveira & Inês Mataloto & Panos Kanavos, 2019. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the art," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(6), pages 891-918, August.
    4. Yuxuan Gu & Hao Zhang & Shahmir H. Ali & Minzhuo Huang & Jingming Wei & Shuyan Gu & Xuemei Zhen & Xiaoqian Hu & Xueshan Sun & Hengjin Dong, 2019. "Social Determinants of Health-Related Quality of Life among Residents in Zhejiang and Qinghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Marieke Krol & Elly Stolk & Werner Brouwer, 2014. "Predicting productivity based on EQ-5D: an explorative study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(5), pages 465-475, June.
    6. Peter Hertzman, 2005. "The cost effectiveness of orlistat in a 1-year weight-management programme for treating overweight and obese patients in Sweden," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 1007-1020, October.
    7. Herrera-Araujo, Daniel & Hammitt, James K. & Rheinberger, Christoph M., 2020. "Theoretical bounds on the value of improved health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Malin Ulfsdotter & Lene Lindberg & Anna Månsdotter, 2015. "A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Swedish Universal Parenting Program All Children in Focus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    9. David Feeny, 2012. "The Multi-attribute Utility Approach to Assessing Health-related Quality of Life," Chapters, in: Andrew M. Jones (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, Second Edition, chapter 36, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Virginia Wiseman & Craig Mitton & Mary M. Doyle‐Waters & Tom Drake & Lesong Conteh & Anthony T. Newall & Obinna Onwujekwe & Stephen Jan, 2016. "Using Economic Evidence to Set Healthcare Priorities in Low‐Income and Lower‐Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Methodological Frameworks," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(S1), pages 140-161, February.
    11. Maria Öjmyr-Joelsson & Margret Nisell & Björn Frenckner & Per-Anders Rydelius & Kyllike Christensson, 2006. "Parental Experiences: Care of Children With High and Intermediate Imperforate Anus," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 15(4), pages 290-305, November.
    12. Rachel Lee-Yin Tan & Zhihao Yang & Ataru Igarashi & Michael Herdman & Nan Luo, 2021. "How Do Respondents Interpret and View the EQ-VAS? A Qualitative Study of Three Asian Populations," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(2), pages 283-293, March.
    13. Salah Ghabri & Jean-Michel Josselin & Benoît Le Maux, 2019. "Could or Should We Use MCDA in the French HTA Process?," Post-Print halshs-02319704, HAL.
    14. Angelis, Aris & Kanavos, Panos, 2017. "Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 137-156.
    15. Panos Kanavos & Olivier Wouters & Aris Angelis & Panos Kanavos & Gilberto Montibeller, 2017. "Resource Allocation and Priority Setting in Health Care: A Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Problem of Value?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 76-83, March.
    16. Bromley, Hannah L. & Petrie, Dennis & Mann, G.Bruce & Nickson, Carolyn & Rea, Daniel & Roberts, Tracy E., 2019. "Valuing the health states associated with breast cancer screening programmes: A systematic review of economic measures," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 142-154.
    17. José María Abellán Perpiñán & Fernando Ignacio Sánchez Martínez & Jorge Eduardo Martínez Pérez & Ildefonso Méndez, 2012. "Lowering The ‘Floor’ Of The Sf‐6d Scoring Algorithm Using A Lottery Equivalent Method," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(11), pages 1271-1285, November.
    18. Jason C Hsu & Jia-Yu Lin & Peng-Chan Lin & Yang-Cheng Lee, 2019. "Comprehensive value assessment of drugs using a multi-criteria decision analysis: An example of targeted therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Irina Odnoletkova & Dirk Ramaekers & Frank Nobels & Geert Goderis & Bert Aertgeerts & Lieven Annemans, 2016. "Delivering Diabetes Education through Nurse-Led Telecoaching. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    20. David Parkin & Nancy Devlin, 2006. "Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost‐utility analysis?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(7), pages 653-664, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:4:p:492-:d:1377655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.