IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p4968-d1094640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mind Sports: Exploring Motivation and Use of Cognitive Strategies in Bridge

Author

Listed:
  • Liat Hen-Herbst

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 4077603, Israel)

  • Liron Lamash

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

  • Yael Fogel

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 4077603, Israel)

  • Sonya Meyer

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 4077603, Israel)

Abstract

The game of Bridge is one of the world’s most widely played mind-sport games. A growing number of people consider it a meaningful leisure activity and are motivated to play. The aim of this study was to describe a sample of Bridge players in Israel in terms of demographics, player records, motivations, and cognitive strategies used to play Bridge and examine the associations between these variables. A sample of 488 Bridge players’ completed an online demographic questionnaire, the Bridge Motivational Factors Checklist, and the Bridge Cognitive Strategies Questionnaire. Most players in the study were men with a mean age of 68.7 years and a Bridge player level between Vice Master and Senior Master. Most players play bridge because “bridge is a fun game”. Strategy use that occurred in-game (versus pre- or postgame) obtained the highest mean score. Because Bridge is a strategy game that can be played from childhood to older adulthood, it is important to continue research to further understand the nature and different aspects of the cognitive strategy used among Bridge players and in other mind sports.

Suggested Citation

  • Liat Hen-Herbst & Liron Lamash & Yael Fogel & Sonya Meyer, 2023. "Mind Sports: Exploring Motivation and Use of Cognitive Strategies in Bridge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-10, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4968-:d:1094640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4968/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/4968/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Becchetti, Leonardo & Fiaschetti, Maurizio & Marini, Giancarlo, 2014. "Card games and economic behavior," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 112-129.
    2. Samantha Punch & Miriam Snellgrove, 2021. "Playing Your Life: Developing Strategies and Managing Impressions in the Game of Bridge," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(3), pages 601-619, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Czibor, Eszter & Claussen, Jörg & van Praag, Mirjam, 2019. "Women in a men’s world: Risk taking in an online card game community," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 62-89.
    2. Grolleau, Gilles & Meunier, Luc & Mzoughi, Naoufel, 2023. "Polluting for (higher) profits: Does an economic gain influence moral judgment of environmental wrongdoings?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Canofari, Paolo & Marini, Giancarlo & Scaramozzino, Pasquale, 2017. "The importance of being remembered: Prices for cemetery plots in the US," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 638-645.
    4. Gilles Grolleau & Luc Meunier & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2023. "Polluting for (Higher) Profits: Does an Economic Gain Influence Moral Judgment of Environmental Wrongdoings?," Post-Print hal-04182138, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:4968-:d:1094640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.