IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p3960-d1077666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Influencing Factors of COVID-19 Vaccination Willingness among Young Adults in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Su

    (CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Sijia Li

    (Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

  • Feng Huang

    (CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Jia Xue

    (Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
    Faculty of Information, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada)

  • Tingshao Zhu

    (CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Vaccine uptake is considered as one of the most effective methods of defending against COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). However, many young adults are hesitant regarding COVID-19 vaccines, and they actually play an important role in virus transmission. Based on a multi-theory model, this study aims to explore the influencing factors related to COVID-19 vaccine willingness among young adults in China. Using semi-structured interviews, this study explored the factors that would motivate young adults with vaccine hesitancy to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interview data with topic modeling as a complementarity method. After comparing the differences and similarities of results generated by thematic analysis and topic modeling, this study ultimately identified ten key factors related to COVID-19 vaccination intention, including the effectiveness and safety of vaccines, application range of vaccine, etc. This study combined thematic analysis with machine learning and provided a comprehensive and nuanced picture of facilitating factors for COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Chinese young adults. Results may be taken as potential themes for authorities and public health workers in vaccination campaigns.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Su & Sijia Li & Feng Huang & Jia Xue & Tingshao Zhu, 2023. "Exploring the Influencing Factors of COVID-19 Vaccination Willingness among Young Adults in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3960-:d:1077666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3960/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3960/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Zhang & Ying Jin & Ningning Liu & Zhenzhen Xiang & Xiaojuan Wang & Ping Xu & Pingping Guo & Minna Mao & Suwen Feng, 2022. "Predicting Physical Activity in Chinese Pregnant Women Using Multi-Theory Model: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Carlos Arcila Calderón & Gonzalo de la Vega & David Blanco Herrero, 2020. "Topic Modeling and Characterization of Hate Speech against Immigrants on Twitter around the Emergence of a Far-Right Party in Spain," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Jeffrey V. Lazarus & Katarzyna Wyka & Trenton M. White & Camila A. Picchio & Kenneth Rabin & Scott C. Ratzan & Jeanna Parsons Leigh & Jia Hu & Ayman El-Mohandes, 2022. "Revisiting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy around the world using data from 23 countries in 2021," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuomo Hartonen & Bradley Jermy & Hanna Sõnajalg & Pekka Vartiainen & Kristi Krebs & Andrius Vabalas & Tuija Leino & Hanna Nohynek & Jonas Sivelä & Reedik Mägi & Mark Daly & Hanna M. Ollila & Lili Mila, 2023. "Nationwide health, socio-economic and genetic predictors of COVID-19 vaccination status in Finland," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 1069-1083, July.
    2. Wang, Di & Lu, Jiahui & Zhong, Ying, 2023. "Futile or fertile? The effect of persuasive strategies on citizen engagement in COVID-19 vaccine-related tweets across six national health departments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    3. Carlos Arcila-Calderón & David Blanco-Herrero & Maximiliano Frías-Vázquez & Francisco Seoane-Pérez, 2021. "Refugees Welcome? Online Hate Speech and Sentiments in Twitter in Spain during the Reception of the Boat Aquarius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Jiehu Yuan & Yucan Xu & Irene Oi Ling Wong & Wendy Wing Tak Lam & Michael Y. Ni & Benjamin J. Cowling & Qiuyan Liao, 2024. "Dynamic predictors of COVID-19 vaccination uptake and their interconnections over two years in Hong Kong," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Sahabi Kabir Sulaiman & Muhammad Sale Musa & Fatimah Isma’il Tsiga-Ahmed & Abdulwahab Kabir Sulaiman & Abdulaziz Tijjani Bako, 2024. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global prevalence and determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake in people living with HIV," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 100-114, January.
    6. Vilmantė Pakalniškienė & Antanas Kairys & Vytautas Jurkuvėnas & Vita Mikuličiūtė & Viktorija Ivleva, 2022. "Could Belief in Fake News Predict Vaccination Behavior in the Elderly?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Libertad Moreno-Luna & María Concepción Saavedra-Serrano & Manuel Jimenez & Juan Antonio Simón & Jose Francisco Tornero-Aguilera, 2021. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Social, Health, and Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Lazaros Vrysis & Nikolaos Vryzas & Rigas Kotsakis & Theodora Saridou & Maria Matsiola & Andreas Veglis & Carlos Arcila-Calderón & Charalampos Dimoulas, 2021. "A Web Interface for Analyzing Hate Speech," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Rowe, Francisco & Mahony, Michael & Graells-Garrido, Eduardo & Rango, Marzia & Sievers, Niklas, 2021. "Using Twitter to Track Immigration Sentiment During Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic," SocArXiv pc3za, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3960-:d:1077666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.