IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2995-d763901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Walking Programs in Fibromyalgia: A Concordance Study between Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Sofía López-Roig

    (Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health, University Miguel Hernández, 03540 San Juan de Alicante, Spain)

  • Carmen Ecija

    (Department of Psychology, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Madrid, Spain)

  • Cecilia Peñacoba

    (Department of Psychology, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Madrid, Spain)

  • Sofía Ivorra

    (Official College of Nursing, 03007 Alicante, Spain)

  • Ainara Nardi-Rodríguez

    (Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health, University Miguel Hernández, 03540 San Juan de Alicante, Spain)

  • Oscar Lecuona

    (Department of Psychology, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Madrid, Spain)

  • María Angeles Pastor-Mira

    (Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health, University Miguel Hernández, 03540 San Juan de Alicante, Spain)

Abstract

This study analyzes the degree of agreement between three self-report measures (Walking Behavior, WALK questionnaire and logbooks) assessing adherence to walking programs through reporting their components (minutes, rests, times a week, consecutive weeks) and their concordance with a standard self-report of physical activity (IPAQ-S questionnaire) and an objective, namely number of steps (pedometer), in 275 women with fibromyalgia. Regularized partial correlation networks were selected as the analytic framework. Three network models based on two different times of assessment, namely T1 and T2, including 6 weeks between both, were used. WALK and the logbook were connected with Walking Behavior and also with the IPAQ-S. The logbook was associated with the pedometers (Z-score > 1 in absolute value). When the behavior was assessed specifically and in a detailed manner, participants’ results for the different self-report measures were in agreement. Specific self-report methods provide detailed information that is consistent with validated self-report measures (IPAQ-S) and objective measures (pedometers). The self-report measures that assess the behavioral components of physical activity are useful when studying the implementation of walking as physical exercise.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofía López-Roig & Carmen Ecija & Cecilia Peñacoba & Sofía Ivorra & Ainara Nardi-Rodríguez & Oscar Lecuona & María Angeles Pastor-Mira, 2022. "Assessing Walking Programs in Fibromyalgia: A Concordance Study between Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2995-:d:763901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2995/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2995/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sacha Epskamp & Mijke Rhemtulla & Denny Borsboom, 2017. "Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 904-927, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucía Sanromán & Patricia Catalá & Carmen Écija & Carlos Suso-Ribera & Jesús San Román & Cecilia Peñacoba, 2022. "The Role of Walking in the Relationship between Catastrophizing and Fatigue in Women with Fibromyalgia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kan, Kees-Jan & van der Maas, Han L.J. & Levine, Stephen Z., 2019. "Extending psychometric network analysis: Empirical evidence against g in favor of mutualism?," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 52-62.
    2. Sacha Epskamp, 2020. "Psychometric network models from time-series and panel data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 206-231, March.
    3. Bing Li & Cody Ding & Huiying Shi & Fenghui Fan & Liya Guo, 2023. "Assessment of Psychological Zone of Optimal Performance among Professional Athletes: EGA and Item Response Theory Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Payton J. Jones & Patrick Mair & Thorsten Simon & Achim Zeileis, 2020. "Network Trees: A Method for Recursively Partitioning Covariance Structures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 926-945, December.
    5. Elise Barboza, Gia & Valentine, Romello, 2022. "A network analysis of post-traumatic stress among youth aging out of the foster care system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Yunxiao Chen & Xiaoou Li & Jingchen Liu & Zhiliang Ying, 2018. "Robust Measurement via A Fused Latent and Graphical Item Response Theory Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 538-562, September.
    7. Hudson Golino & Alexander P. Christensen & Robert Moulder & Seohyun Kim & Steven M. Boker, 2022. "Modeling Latent Topics in Social Media using Dynamic Exploratory Graph Analysis: The Case of the Right-wing and Left-wing Trolls in the 2016 US Elections," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 156-187, March.
    8. Sacha Epskamp & Adela-Maria Isvoranu & Mike W.-L. Cheung, 2022. "Meta-analytic Gaussian Network Aggregation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 12-46, March.
    9. Di Zhao & Guopeng Li & Miao Zhou & Qing Wang & Yiming Gao & Xiangyu Zhao & Xinting Zhang & Ping Li, 2022. "Differences According to Sex in the Relationship between Social Participation and Well-Being: A Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-11, October.
    10. Teague R. Henry & Donald J. Robinaugh & Eiko I. Fried, 2022. "On the Control of Psychological Networks," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 188-213, March.
    11. Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago & Gustavo Hermes Soares & Lisa Gaye Smithers & Rachel Roberts & Lisa Jamieson, 2022. "Psychological Network of Stress, Coping and Social Support in an Aboriginal Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Haiyan Liu & Ick Hoon Jin & Zhiyong Zhang & Ying Yuan, 2021. "Social Network Mediation Analysis: A Latent Space Approach," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(1), pages 272-298, March.
    13. Jinsong Chen, 2020. "A Partially Confirmatory Approach to the Multidimensional Item Response Theory with the Bayesian Lasso," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 738-774, September.
    14. Conte, Federica & Costantini, Giulio & Rinaldi, Luca & Gerosa, Tiziano & Girelli, Luisa, 2020. "Intellect is not that expensive: differential association of cultural and socio-economic factors with crystallized intelligence in a sample of Italian adolescents," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Yago Ramis & Joan Pons & Saul Alcaraz & Susana Pallares & Carme Viladrich & Juan Muñoz-Justicia & Miquel Torregrossa, 2023. "Perfectionistic Environments and Irrational Beliefs on the Transition to Elite Athletic Performance: A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-13, April.
    16. Jones, Payton J. & Mair, Patrick & Simon, Thorsten & Zeileis, Achim, 2019. "Network Model Trees," OSF Preprints ha4cw, Center for Open Science.
    17. Kevin H. Lee & Qian Chen & Wayne S. DeSarbo & Lingzhou Xue, 2022. "Estimating Finite Mixtures of Ordinal Graphical Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 83-106, March.
    18. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou & Liu, Jingchen & Ying, Zhiliang, 2018. "Robust measurement via a fused latent and graphical item response theory model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103181, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2995-:d:763901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.