IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2478-d754582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of the Bolk Model for Positive Health and Living Environment in the Development of an Integrated Health Promotion Approach: A Case Study in a Socioeconomically Deprived Neighborhood in The Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Herman A. van Wietmarschen

    (Department Nutrition & Health, Louis Bolk Institute, Kosterijland 3-5, 3981 AJ Bunnik, The Netherlands)

  • Sjef Staps

    (Department Nutrition & Health, Louis Bolk Institute, Kosterijland 3-5, 3981 AJ Bunnik, The Netherlands)

  • Judith Meijer

    (Saba Cares, Paris Hill Road 12, The Bottom, Saba, The Netherlands
    Humanism and Social Resilience, University of Humanistic Studies, Kromme Nieuwegracht 29, 3512 HD Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • J. Francisca Flinterman

    (Healthy Living Department, Health Promotion and Health Innovation, GGD Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Miek C. Jong

    (Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Holmgatan 10, 851 70 Sundsvall, Sweden
    National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway)

Abstract

Background. Despite considerable efforts, health disparities between people with high and low socioeconomic status (SES) have not changed over the past decades in The Netherlands. To create a culture of health and an environment in which all people can flourish, a shift in focus is needed from disease management towards health promotion. The Bolk model for Positive Health and Living Environment was used as a tool to guide this shift. This study aimed to describe how this model was used and perceived by stakeholders in a case study on an integrated health promotion approach for residents with low SES. Methods. An instrumental case study was undertaken in Venserpolder, a neighborhood in Amsterdam South East of approximately 8500 residents. A participatory action approach was used that allowed continuous interaction between the residents, health care professionals, researchers, and other stakeholders. The Bolk model is a tool, based on the conceptual framework of positive health, that was developed to guide health promotion practice. Its use in the case study was evaluated by means of semistructured interviews with stakeholders, using qualitative directed content analyses. Results. The Bolk model was found to be a useful tool to identify and map the needs and strengths of residents with low SES. The model facilitated the development and implementation of eight health promotion pilots by transforming the needs and strengths of residents into concrete actions carried out by responsible actors in the neighborhood. Although the Bolk model seemed to be accepted by all stakeholders, the shift towards positive health thinking appeared to be more embodied by local professionals than by residents. Adjustments were proposed to enhance the applicability of the model in a multicultural setting, to increase its cultural sensitivity and to use language more familiar to residents. Conclusions. The Bolk model for positive health and living environment seems to be promising in the guidance of health promotion practices in Amsterdam South East. Further research and development are needed to improve its cultural sensitivity and to investigate its applicability in a broader range of public health settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Herman A. van Wietmarschen & Sjef Staps & Judith Meijer & J. Francisca Flinterman & Miek C. Jong, 2022. "The Use of the Bolk Model for Positive Health and Living Environment in the Development of an Integrated Health Promotion Approach: A Case Study in a Socioeconomically Deprived Neighborhood in The Net," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2478-:d:754582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelsey Lucyk & Lindsay McLaren, 2017. "Taking stock of the social determinants of health: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miek C. Jong & Trine Stub & Eric Mulder & Mats Jong, 2022. "The Development and Acceptability of a Wilderness Programme to Support the Health and Well-Being of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: The WAYA Programme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Gama & João Victor Rocha & Maria J. Marques & Sofia Azeredo-Lopes & Ana Rita Pedro & Sónia Dias, 2022. "How Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Migrant Populations in Lisbon, Portugal? A Study on Perceived Effects on Health and Economic Condition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-10, February.
    2. Alexander Maas & Liang Lu, 2021. "Elections have Consequences: Partisan Politics may be Literally Killing Us," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 45-56, January.
    3. Hui Chang & Jia Zhou & Zhiwen Wang, 2022. "Multidimensional Factors Affecting Successful Aging among Empty-Nesters in China Based on Social-Ecological System Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Sanghamitra Pati & Abhinav Sinha & Shishirendu Ghosal & Sushmita Kerketta & John Tayu Lee & Srikanta Kanungo, 2022. "Family-Level Multimorbidity among Older Adults in India: Looking through a Syndemic Lens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    5. M. Pilar Matud & M. Concepción García & Demelza Fortes, 2019. "Relevance of Gender and Social Support in Self-Rated Health and Life Satisfaction in Elderly Spanish People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Kim, Jisun & Kim, Dong Ha & Lee, Jihyun & Cheon, Youngseo & Yoo, Seunghyun, 2022. "A scoping review of qualitative geographic information systems in studies addressing health issues," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    7. Júlia Alves Menezes & Ana Paula Madureira & Rhavena Barbosa dos Santos & Isabela de Brito Duval & Pedro Regoto & Carina Margonari & Martha Macêdo de Lima Barata & Ulisses Confalonieri, 2021. "Analyzing Spatial Patterns of Health Vulnerability to Drought in the Brazilian Semiarid Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Kelsey J. Picha & Cailee E. Welch Bacon & R. Curt Bay & Joy H. Lewis & Alison R. Snyder Valier, 2023. "Athletic Trainers’ Perceptions of and Experience with Social Determinants of Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-11, April.
    9. Karatekin, Canan & Mason, Susan M. & Riegelman, Amy & Bakker, Caitlin & Hunt, Shanda & Gresham, Bria & Corcoran, Frederique & Barnes, Andrew, 2022. "Adverse childhood experiences: A scoping review of measures and methods," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Clare Hawkes & Kimberley Norris & Janine Joyce & Douglas Paton, 2021. "Resettlement Stressors for Women of Refugee Background Resettled in Regional Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Maas, Alexander S. & Lu, Liang, 2020. "“Elections have Consequences”: Partisan Politics are Literally Killing Us," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304457, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Simon K. Medcalfe & Catherine P. Slade & Wendy Habegger, 2023. "Religion as a social determinant of women's cancer screening: Evidence from state level data for policy and resource allocation," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 82(3), pages 263-279, May.
    13. Andrea Leuenberger & Olga Cambaco & Hyacinthe R. Zabré & Isaac Lyatuu & Jürg Utzinger & Khátia Munguambe & Sonja Merten & Mirko S. Winkler, 2021. "“It Is Like We Are Living in a Different World” : Health Inequity in Communities Surrounding Industrial Mining Sites in Burkina Faso, Mozambique, and Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Regina Grazuleviciene & Sandra Andrusaityte & Tomas Gražulevičius & Audrius Dėdelė, 2020. "Neighborhood Social and Built Environment and Disparities in the Risk of Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2478-:d:754582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.