IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2067-d748033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three Quarters of a Century of Research on RF Exposure Assessment and Dosimetry—What Have We Learned?

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth R. Foster

    (Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Marvin C. Ziskin

    (Department of Radiology, Temple University Medical School, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA)

  • Quirino Balzano

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

Abstract

This commentary, by three authors with an aggregate experience of more than a century in technology and health and safety studies concerning radiofrequency (RF) energy, asks what has been learned over the past 75 years of research on radiofrequency and health, focusing on technologies for exposure assessment and dosimetry. Research programs on health and safety of RF exposure began in the 1950s, initially motivated by occupational health concerns for military personnel, and later to address public concerns about exposures to RF energy from environmental sources and near-field exposures from RF transmitting devices such as mobile phones that are used near the body. While this research largely focused on the biological effects of RF energy, it also led to important improvements in exposure assessment and dosimetry. This work in the aggregate has made RF energy one of the best studied potential technological hazards and represents a productive response by large numbers of scientists and engineers, working in many countries and supported by diverse funding agencies, to the ever rapidly evolving uses of the electromagnetic spectrum. This review comments on present needs of the field, which include raising the quality of dosimetry in many RF bioeffects studies and developing improved exposure/dosimetric techniques for the higher microwave frequencies to be used by forthcoming communications technologies. At present, however, the major uncertainties in dosimetric modeling/exposure assessment are likely to be related to the inherent variability in real-world exposures, rather than imprecision in measurement technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth R. Foster & Marvin C. Ziskin & Quirino Balzano, 2022. "Three Quarters of a Century of Research on RF Exposure Assessment and Dosimetry—What Have We Learned?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2067-:d:748033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2067/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2067/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myrtill Simkó & Daniel Remondini & Olga Zeni & Maria Rosaria Scarfi, 2016. "Quality Matters: Systematic Analysis of Endpoints Related to “Cellular Life” in Vitro Data of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Emma Chiaramello & Marta Bonato & Serena Fiocchi & Gabriella Tognola & Marta Parazzini & Paolo Ravazzani & Joe Wiart, 2019. "Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Exposure Assessment in Indoor Environments: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Myrtill Simkó & Mats-Olof Mattsson, 2019. "5G Wireless Communication and Health Effects—A Pragmatic Review Based on Available Studies Regarding 6 to 100 GHz," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Zicheng Liu & Djamel Allal & Maurice Cox & Joe Wiart, 2020. "Discrepancies of Measured SAR between Traditional and Fast Measuring Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Maria Rosaria Scarfì & Mats-Olof Mattsson & Myrtill Simkó & Olga Zeni, 2019. "Special Issue: “Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields in Biology and Medicine: From Mechanisms to Biomedical Applications”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-3, November.
    4. Amelie Massardier-Pilonchery & Elena Nerrière & Sophie Croidieu & Fabien Ndagijimana & François Gaudaire & Christophe Martinsons & Nicolas Noé & Martine Hours, 2019. "Assessment of Personal Occupational Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in Libraries and Media Libraries, Using Calibrated On-Body Exposimeters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Annamaria Sârbu & Simona Miclăuș & Angela Digulescu & Paul Bechet, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of User Exposure to the Electromagnetic Radiation Emitted by the Fourth and Fifth Generations of Wi-Fi Communication Devices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Yazan Akkam & Ahmed A. Al-Taani & Salam Ayasreh & Abeer Almutairi & Nosaibah Akkam, 2020. "Correlation of Blood Oxidative Stress Parameters to Indoor Radiofrequency Radiation: A Cross Sectional Study in Jordan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2067-:d:748033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.