IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14148-d957414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Health Directives in a Pandemic: Paradoxical Messages for Domestic Abuse Victims in Four Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Soma Gregory

    (School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College, University of Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Stephanie Holt

    (School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College, University of Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Christine Barter

    (School of Social Work, Care and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK)

  • Nicola Christofides

    (School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa)

  • Ogopoleng Maremela

    (School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa)

  • Nobulembu Mwanda Motjuwadi

    (COPESSA (Community-Based Prevention and Empowerment Strategies), Johannesburg 1818, South Africa)

  • Cathy Humphreys

    (Department of Social Work, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia)

  • Ruth Elliffe

    (School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College, University of Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Nicky Stanley

    (School of Social Work, Care and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK)

Abstract

When the COVID-19 pandemic manifested urgent concerns were raised around the globe about the increased risk that public health restrictions could pose for victims of domestic abuse. Governments, NGOs and community services swiftly responded to convey the message that services for victims were operational and restrictions did not apply to those fleeing harm. This paper reports on the various approaches used to communicate this public health messaging during COVID-19, further highlighting strengths and learning which could inform future crises messaging. It utilises data gathered through a rapid review and mapping of policy and practice initiatives across 4 high-middle income countries: UK, Australia, South Africa and Ireland. Four themes were identified: (1) Top-down: National media messaging; (2) Top-down: Political leadership; (3) Traditional media vs. social media and (4) Bottom-up messaging: Localised, community-based messaging. It was found that a strong, clear top-down stance on domestic abuse was perceived as beneficial during COVID-19. However, a stronger focus on evaluation, reach and impact, particularly for minority groups may be required. Newer forms of media were shown to have potential in conveying messaging to minority groups. Community and grassroots organizations demonstrated their experiential knowledge in reaching target audiences. Harnessing this expertise for future crises messaging may be valuable.

Suggested Citation

  • Soma Gregory & Stephanie Holt & Christine Barter & Nicola Christofides & Ogopoleng Maremela & Nobulembu Mwanda Motjuwadi & Cathy Humphreys & Ruth Elliffe & Nicky Stanley, 2022. "Public Health Directives in a Pandemic: Paradoxical Messages for Domestic Abuse Victims in Four Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14148-:d:957414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14148/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14148/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen M. Utych & Luke Fowler, 2020. "Age-based messaging strategies for communication about COVID-19," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Falco, Paolo & Zaccagni, Sarah, 2020. "Promoting social distancing in a pandemic: Beyond the good intentions," OSF Preprints a2nys, Center for Open Science.
    2. Zhang, Zhiwei & Liu, Gao & Chen, Bin & Huang, Kun, 2022. "Social asset or social liability? How partisanship moderates the relationship between social capital and Covid-19 vaccination rates across United States counties," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    3. Wanqi Gong & Qin Guo & Crystal L. Jiang, 2021. "Conversation Breeds Compliance: The Role of Intergenerational Communication in Promoting Preventive Behaviors against COVID-19 among Middle-Aged Parents in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Shin KINOSHITA & Masayuki SATO & Takanori IDA, 2022. "Bayesian Probability Revision and Infection Prevention Behavior in Japan : A Quantitative Analysis of the First Wave of COVID-19," Discussion papers e-22-004, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    5. J -F Daoust, 2020. "Elderly people and responses to COVID-19 in 27 Countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Aaron Deslatte, 2020. "To shop or shelter? Issue framing effects and social-distancing preferences in the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    7. Nathan Favero & Mogens Jin Pedersen, 2020. "How to encourage “Togetherness by Keeping Apart†amid COVID-19? The ineffectiveness of prosocial and empathy appeals," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(2).
    8. Shusaku Sasaki & Hirofumi Kurokawa & Fumio Ohtake, 2021. "Effective but fragile? Responses to repeated nudge-based messages for preventing the spread of COVID-19 infection," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 371-408, July.
    9. Shusaku Sasaki & Hirofumi Kurokawa & Fumio Ohtake, 2020. "Short-term responses to nudge-based messages for preventing the spread of COVID-19 infection: Intention, behavior, and life satisfaction," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 20-11, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    10. Victoria S. Shelus & Simone C. Frank & Allison J. Lazard & Isabella C. A. Higgins & Marlyn Pulido & Ana Paula C. Richter & Sara M. Vandegrift & Rhyan N. Vereen & Kurt M. Ribisl & Marissa G. Hall, 2020. "Motivations and Barriers for the Use of Face Coverings during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Messaging Insights from Focus Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Masayuki SATO & Shin KINOSHITA & Takanori IDA, 2022. "Subjective Risk Valuation and Behavioral Change : Evidence from COVID-19 in the U.K. and Japan," Discussion papers e-22-011, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    12. Paolo Nicola Barbieri & Beatrice Bonini, 2021. "Political orientation and adherence to social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(2), pages 483-504, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14148-:d:957414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.