IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i14p8366-d858656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Usability and Quality of Explanations of a Machine Learning Web-Based Tool for Oral Tongue Cancer Prognostication

Author

Listed:
  • Rasheed Omobolaji Alabi

    (Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
    Department of Industrial Digitalization, School of Technology and Innovations, University of Vaasa, 65200 Vaasa, Finland)

  • Alhadi Almangush

    (Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
    Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 3 (P.O. Box 21), FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
    Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Pathology, 20500 Turku, Finland
    Faculty of Dentistry, Misurata University, Misurata 2478, Libya)

  • Mohammed Elmusrati

    (Department of Industrial Digitalization, School of Technology and Innovations, University of Vaasa, 65200 Vaasa, Finland)

  • Ilmo Leivo

    (Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Pathology, 20500 Turku, Finland)

  • Antti Mäkitie

    (Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 HUS Helsinki, Finland
    Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

Background : Machine learning models have been reported to assist in the proper management of cancer through accurate prognostication. Integrating such models as a web-based prognostic tool or calculator may help to improve cancer care and assist clinicians in making oral cancer management-related decisions. However, none of these models have been recommended in daily practices of oral cancer due to concerns related to machine learning methodologies and clinical implementation challenges. An instance of the concerns inherent to the science of machine learning is explainability. Objectives: This study measures the usability and explainability of a machine learning-based web prognostic tool that was designed for prediction of oral tongue cancer. We used the System Usability Scale (SUS) and System Causability Scale (SCS) to evaluate the explainability of the prognostic tool. In addition, we propose a framework for the evaluation of post hoc explainability of web-based prognostic tools. Methods: A SUS- and SCS-based questionnaire was administered amongst pathologists, radiologists, cancer and machine learning researchers and surgeons ( n = 11) to evaluate the quality of explanations offered by the machine learning-based web prognostic tool to address the concern of explainability and usability of these models for cancer management. The examined web-based tool was developed by our group and is freely available online. Results: In terms of the usability of the web-based tool using the SUS, 81.9% (45.5% strongly agreed; 36.4% agreed) agreed that neither the support of a technical assistant nor a need to learn many things were required to use the web-based tool. Furthermore, 81.8% agreed that the evaluated web-based tool was not cumbersome to use (usability). The average score for the SCS (explainability) was 0.74. A total of 91.0% of the participants strongly agreed that the web-based tool can assist in clinical decision-making. These scores indicated that the examined web-based tool offers a significant level of usability and explanations about the outcome of interest. Conclusions: Integrating the trained and internally and externally validated model as a web-based tool or calculator is poised to offer an effective and easy approach towards the usage and acceptance of these models in the future daily practice. This approach has received significant attention in recent years. Thus, it is important that the usability and explainability of these models are measured to achieve such touted benefits. A usable and well-explained web-based tool further brings the use of these web-based tools closer to everyday clinical practices. Thus, the concept of more personalized and precision oncology can be achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasheed Omobolaji Alabi & Alhadi Almangush & Mohammed Elmusrati & Ilmo Leivo & Antti Mäkitie, 2022. "Measuring the Usability and Quality of Explanations of a Machine Learning Web-Based Tool for Oral Tongue Cancer Prognostication," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8366-:d:858656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8366/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/14/8366/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andre Esteva & Brett Kuprel & Roberto A. Novoa & Justin Ko & Susan M. Swetter & Helen M. Blau & Sebastian Thrun, 2017. "Correction: Corrigendum: Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 546(7660), pages 686-686, June.
    2. Andre Esteva & Brett Kuprel & Roberto A. Novoa & Justin Ko & Susan M. Swetter & Helen M. Blau & Sebastian Thrun, 2017. "Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 542(7639), pages 115-118, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin Lu & Laurent Dercle & Binsheng Zhao & Lawrence H. Schwartz, 2021. "Deep learning for the prediction of early on-treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer from serial medical imaging," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Zheng Yan & Wenqian Robertson & Yaosheng Lou & Tom W. Robertson & Sung Yong Park, 2021. "Finding leading scholars in mobile phone behavior: a mixed-method analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9499-9517, December.
    3. Freddy Gabbay & Rotem Lev Aharoni & Ori Schweitzer, 2022. "Deep Neural Network Memory Performance and Throughput Modeling and Simulation Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Jungyoon Kim & Jihye Lim, 2021. "A Deep Neural Network-Based Method for Prediction of Dementia Using Big Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Gang Yu & Kai Sun & Chao Xu & Xing-Hua Shi & Chong Wu & Ting Xie & Run-Qi Meng & Xiang-He Meng & Kuan-Song Wang & Hong-Mei Xiao & Hong-Wen Deng, 2021. "Accurate recognition of colorectal cancer with semi-supervised deep learning on pathological images," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. DonHee Lee & Seong No Yoon, 2021. "Application of Artificial Intelligence-Based Technologies in the Healthcare Industry: Opportunities and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Claus Zippel & Sabine Bohnet-Joschko, 2021. "Rise of Clinical Studies in the Field of Machine Learning: A Review of Data Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Dario Sipari & Betsy D. M. Chaparro-Rico & Daniele Cafolla, 2022. "SANE (Easy Gait Analysis System): Towards an AI-Assisted Automatic Gait-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-27, August.
    9. Jamil Ahmad & Abdul Khader Jilani Saudagar & Khalid Mahmood Malik & Waseem Ahmad & Muhammad Badruddin Khan & Mozaherul Hoque Abul Hasanat & Abdullah AlTameem & Mohammed AlKhathami & Muhammad Sajjad, 2022. "Disease Progression Detection via Deep Sequence Learning of Successive Radiographic Scans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Andreas Fügener & Jörn Grahl & Alok Gupta & Wolfgang Ketter, 2022. "Cognitive Challenges in Human–Artificial Intelligence Collaboration: Investigating the Path Toward Productive Delegation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 678-696, June.
    11. Vidhya V. & Anjan Gudigar & U. Raghavendra & Ajay Hegde & Girish R. Menon & Filippo Molinari & Edward J. Ciaccio & U. Rajendra Acharya, 2021. "Automated Detection and Screening of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Using Computed Tomography Images: A Comprehensive Review and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-29, June.
    12. Pujin Wang & Jianzhuang Xiao & Ken’ichi Kawaguchi & Lichen Wang, 2022. "Automatic Ceiling Damage Detection in Large-Span Structures Based on Computer Vision and Deep Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Xu Gong & Keqin Guan & Qiyang Chen, 2022. "The role of textual analysis in oil futures price forecasting based on machine learning approach," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(10), pages 1987-2017, October.
    14. Julian Schiele & Thomas Koperna & Jens O. Brunner, 2021. "Predicting intensive care unit bed occupancy for integrated operating room scheduling via neural networks," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 65-88, February.
    15. Kai Feng & Han Hong & Ke Tang & Jingyuan Wang, 2023. "Statistical Tests for Replacing Human Decision Makers with Algorithms," Papers 2306.11689, arXiv.org.
    16. Zhiming Cui & Yu Fang & Lanzhuju Mei & Bojun Zhang & Bo Yu & Jiameng Liu & Caiwen Jiang & Yuhang Sun & Lei Ma & Jiawei Huang & Yang Liu & Yue Zhao & Chunfeng Lian & Zhongxiang Ding & Min Zhu & Dinggan, 2022. "A fully automatic AI system for tooth and alveolar bone segmentation from cone-beam CT images," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Chowdhury, Emon Kalyan, 2019. "Use of Artificial Intelligence in Stock Trading," MPRA Paper 118175, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Apr 2019.
    18. Victor Olsavszky & Mihnea Dosius & Cristian Vladescu & Johannes Benecke, 2020. "Time Series Analysis and Forecasting with Automated Machine Learning on a National ICD-10 Database," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Taneja, Anu & Arora, Anuja, 2019. "Modeling user preferences using neural networks and tensor factorization model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 132-148.
    20. Hanning Ying & Xiaoqing Liu & Min Zhang & Yiyue Ren & Shihui Zhen & Xiaojie Wang & Bo Liu & Peng Hu & Lian Duan & Mingzhi Cai & Ming Jiang & Xiangdong Cheng & Xiangyang Gong & Haitao Jiang & Jianshuai, 2024. "A multicenter clinical AI system study for detection and diagnosis of focal liver lesions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:14:p:8366-:d:858656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.