IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i12p7082-d834987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Physical-Chemical Evolution of High-Sulfur Petroleum Coke on Hg 0 Removal from Coal-Fired Flue Gas and Exploration of Its Micro-Scale Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Jiang

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Yongfa Diao

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China)

Abstract

As the solid waste by-product from the delayed coking process, high-sulfur petroleum coke (HSPC), which is hardly used for green utilization, becomes a promising raw material for Hg 0 removal from coal-fired flue gas. The effects of the physical–chemical evolution of HSPC on Hg 0 removal are discussed. The improved micropores created by pyrolysis and KOH activation could lead to over 50% of Hg 0 removal efficiency with the loss of inherent sulfur. Additional S-containing and Br-containing additives are usually introduced to enhance active surface functional groups for Hg 0 oxidation, where the main product are HgS, HgBr, and HgBr 2 . The chemical–mechanical activation method can make additives well loaded on the surface for Hg 0 removal. The DFT method is used to sufficiently explain the micro-scale reaction mechanism of Hg 0 oxidation on the surface of revised-HSPC. ReaxFF is usually employed for the simulation of the pyrolysis of HSPC. However, the developed mesoporous structure would be a better choice for Hg 0 removal in that the coupled influence of pore structure and functional groups plays a comprehensive role in both adsorption and oxidation of Hg 0 . Thus, the optimal porous structure should be further explored. On the other hand, both internal and surface sulfur in HSPC should be enhanced to be exposed to saving sulfur additives or obtaining higher Hg 0 removal capacity. For it, controllable pyrolysis with different pyrolysis parameters and the chemical–mechanical activation method is recommended to both improve pore structure and increase functional groups for Hg 0 removal. For simulation methods, ReaxFF and DFT theory are expected to explain the micro-scale mechanisms of controllable pyrolysis, the chemical–mechanical activation of HSPC, and further Hg 0 removal. This review work aims to provide both experimental and simulational guidance to promote the development of industrial application of Hg 0 adsorbent based on HSPC.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Jiang & Yongfa Diao, 2022. "The Effects of Physical-Chemical Evolution of High-Sulfur Petroleum Coke on Hg 0 Removal from Coal-Fired Flue Gas and Exploration of Its Micro-Scale Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7082-:d:834987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7082/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7082/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Lulu & Feng, Xuan & Shen, Laihong & Jiang, Shouxi & Gu, Haiming, 2019. "Carbon and sulfur conversion of petroleum coke in the chemical looping gasification process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1205-1216.
    2. Chen, Wei & Gong, Meng & Li, Kaixu & Xia, Mingwei & Chen, Zhiqun & Xiao, Haoyu & Fang, Yang & Chen, Yingquan & Yang, Haiping & Chen, Hanping, 2020. "Insight into KOH activation mechanism during biomass pyrolysis: Chemical reactions between O-containing groups and KOH," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    3. Marta Marczak-Grzesik & Stanisław Budzyń & Barbara Tora & Szymon Szufa & Krzysztof Kogut & Piotr Burmistrz, 2021. "Low-Cost Organic Adsorbents for Elemental Mercury Removal from Lignite Flue Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Shan, Yuli & Guan, Dabo & Meng, Jing & Liu, Zhu & Schroeder, Heike & Liu, Jianghua & Mi, Zhifu, 2018. "Rapid growth of petroleum coke consumption and its related emissions in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 494-502.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dmytro Zhuravel & Kyrylo Samoichuk & Serhii Petrychenko & Andrii Bondar & Taras Hutsol & Maciej Kuboń & Marcin Niemiec & Lyudmyla Mykhailova & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Dmytro Sorokin, 2022. "Modeling of Diesel Engine Fuel Systems Reliability When Operating on Biofuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Aniza, Ria & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Lin, Yu-Ying & Tran, Khanh-Quang & Chang, Jo-Shu & Lam, Su Shiung & Park, Young-Kwon & Kwon, Eilhann E. & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2021. "Independent parallel pyrolysis kinetics of extracted proteins and lipids as well as model carbohydrates in microalgae," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    3. Khan Rabnawaz & Kong YuSheng, 2020. "Effects of Energy Consumption on GDP: New Evidence of 24 Countries on Their Natural Resources and Production of Electricity," Ekonomika (Economics), Sciendo, vol. 99(1), pages 26-49, June.
    4. Kuo-Hsiung Lin & Jiun-Horng Tsai & Zhi-Wei Chou & Hung-Lung Chiang, 2021. "Product Characteristics of Sludge Pyrolysis and Adsorption Performance of Metals by Char," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Zhou, Guangzhao & Guo, Zanquan & Sun, Simin & Jin, Qingsheng, 2023. "A CNN-BiGRU-AM neural network for AI applications in shale oil production prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    6. Yang, Jie & Ma, Liping & Yang, Jing & Liu, Hongpan & Liu, Shengyu & Yang, Yingchun & Mu, Liusen & Wei, Yi & Ao, Ran & Guo, Zhiying & Dai, Quxiu & Wang, Huiming, 2019. "Thermodynamic and kinetic analysis of CuO-CaSO4 oxygen carrier in chemical looping gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Oleg Kucher & Taras Hutsol & Szymon Glowacki & Iryna Andreitseva & Anatolii Dibrova & Andrii Muzychenko & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Agnieszka Szparaga & Sławomir Kocira, 2022. "Energy Potential of Biogas Production in Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Zdzislawa Romanowska-Duda & Szymon Szufa & Mieczysław Grzesik & Krzysztof Piotrowski & Regina Janas, 2021. "The Promotive Effect of Cyanobacteria and Chlorella sp. Foliar Biofertilization on Growth and Metabolic Activities of Willow ( Salix viminalis L.) Plants as Feedstock Production, Solid Biofuel and Bio," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Ma, Jiao & Kong, Wenwen & Di, Weiqiang & Zhang, Zhikun & Wang, Zhuozhi & Feng, Shuo & Shen, Boxiong & Mu, Lan, 2022. "Synergistic effect of bulking agents and biodegradation on the pyrolysis of biodried products derived from municipal organic wastes: Product distribution and biochar physicochemical characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    10. Bryan Díaz & Alicia Sommer-Márquez & Paola E. Ordoñez & Ernesto Bastardo-González & Marvin Ricaurte & Carlos Navas-Cárdenas, 2024. "Synthesis Methods, Properties, and Modifications of Biochar-Based Materials for Wastewater Treatment: A Review," Resources, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-33, January.
    11. Li, Gang & Lv, Xuewei & Ding, Chengyi & Zhou, Xuangeng & Zhong, Dapeng & Qiu, Guibao, 2020. "Non-isothermal carbothermic reduction kinetics of calcium ferrite and hematite as oxygen carriers for chemical looping gasification applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    12. Yu, Xin & Yu, Dunxi & Liu, Fangqi & Han, Jingkun & Wu, Jianqun & Xu, Minghou, 2022. "Synergistic effects, gas evolution and ash interaction during isothermal steam co-gasification of biomass with high-sulfur petroleum coke," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    13. Gao, Zhuwei & Li, Chengxin & Qi, Xinyu & Wei, Yaodong & Liu, Zhongxin, 2022. "Flow analysis on carbonaceous deposition of heavy oil droplets and catalyst particles for coking formation process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Szufa, S. & Piersa, P. & Junga, R. & Błaszczuk, A. & Modliński, N. & Sobek, S. & Marczak-Grzesik, M. & Adrian, Ł. & Dzikuć, M., 2023. "Numerical modeling of the co-firing process of an in situ steam-torrefied biomass with coal in a 230 MW industrial-scale boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    15. Li, Zhenwei & Xu, Hongpeng & Yang, Wenming & Wu, Shaohua, 2021. "Numerical study on the effective utilization of high sulfur petroleum coke for syngas production via chemical looping gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Edyta Wrzesińska-Jędrusiak & Michał Czarnecki & Paweł Kazimierski & Paulina Bandrów & Szymon Szufa, 2023. "The Circular Economy in the Management of Waste from Leather Processing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, January.
    17. Jerzy Gorecki & Mariusz Macherzynski & Jacek Chmielowiec & Karel Borovec & Mateusz Wałeka & Yinyou Deng & Janusz Sarbinowski & Grzegorz Pasciak, 2022. "The Methods and Stands for Testing Fixed Sorbent and Sorbent Polymer Composite Materials for the Removal of Mercury from Flue Gases," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Wang, Kun & An, Zewen & Wang, Fengyin & Liang, Wenzheng & Wang, Cuiping & Guo, Qingjie & Liu, Yongzhuo & Yue, Guangxi, 2021. "Effect of ash on the performance of iron-based oxygen carrier in the chemical looping gasification of municipal sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    19. Du, Xin & Li, Yun, 2019. "Experimental comparison and optimization on granular bed filters with three types of filling schemes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Jianping Yang & Hong Xu & Fanyue Meng & Qingjie Guo & Tao He & Zequn Yang & Wenqi Qu & Hailong Li, 2022. "A Molten-Salt Pyrolysis Synthesis Strategy toward Sulfur-Functionalized Carbon for Elemental Mercury Removal from Coal-Combustion Flue Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:12:p:7082-:d:834987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.