IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6897-d831777.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facility or Transport Inequality? Decomposing Healthcare Accessibility Inequality in Shenzhen, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuolin Tao

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, No. 19, Xinjiekouwai Ave., Haidian, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Qi Wang

    (Proficiency Skill Appraisal and Guidance Center of Natural Resources Ministry, Beijing 100830, China)

Abstract

Accessibility to healthcare services is crucial for residents’ wellbeing. Numerous studies have revealed significant spatial inequality in healthcare accessibility across various contexts. However, it still remains unclear whether the inequality is caused by the unbalanced spatial distribution of healthcare facilities or by unequal transport access to them. This study decomposes inequality in healthcare accessibility into facility- and transport-driven inequality by comparing scenarios of healthcare accessibility, which consider various combinations of multidimensional components of accessibility using different distance measures. Using a case study in Shenzhen, this study reveals that both facility distribution and transport access substantially contribute to spatial inequality in healthcare accessibility. Facility distribution accounts for 61.3% and 50.8% of the overall accessibility inequality for driving and transit modes, respectively. The remaining inequality is induced by imbalanced mobility provided by transport networks. Furthermore, the impact of transport component on healthcare accessibility is unevenly distributed. This study highlights that both facility- and transport-related countermeasures should be considered to improve the accessibility and equality of healthcare services. It provides transferable methods for quantitatively decomposing facility- and transport-driven inequality in accessibility to healthcare or other facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuolin Tao & Qi Wang, 2022. "Facility or Transport Inequality? Decomposing Healthcare Accessibility Inequality in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6897-:d:831777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6897/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6897/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wanhui Zheng & Hong Sun & Peilin Zhang & Guojiang Zhou & Quanyu Jin & Xiaoqin Lu, 2018. "A four-stage DEA-based efficiency evaluation of public hospitals in China after the implementation of new medical reforms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Fangye Du & Jiaoe Wang & Yu Liu & Zihao Zhou & Haitao Jin, 2022. "Equity in Health-Seeking Behavior of Groups Using Different Transportations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Amritpal Kaur Khakh & Victoria Fast & Rizwan Shahid, 2019. "Spatial Accessibility to Primary Healthcare Services by Multimodal Means of Travel: Synthesis and Case Study in the City of Calgary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Rebecca Brough & Matthew Freedman & David C. Phillips, 2021. "Understanding socioeconomic disparities in travel behavior during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 753-774, September.
    5. Sharma, Gajanand & Patil, Gopal R., 2021. "Public transit accessibility approach to understand the equity for public healthcare services: A case study of Greater Mumbai," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Tao, Zhuolin & Zhou, Jiangping & Lin, Xiongbin & Chao, Heng & Li, Guicai, 2020. "Investigating the impacts of public transport on job accessibility in Shenzhen, China: a multi-modal approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Neutens, Tijs, 2015. "Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-27.
    8. Khan, Abdullah A., 1992. "An integrated approach to measuring potential spatial access to health care services," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 275-287, October.
    9. Widener, Michael J. & Farber, Steven & Neutens, Tijs & Horner, Mark, 2015. "Spatiotemporal accessibility to supermarkets using public transit: an interaction potential approach in Cincinnati, Ohio," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 72-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan Liu & Chuyao Liao & Li Zhuo & Haiyan Tao, 2022. "Evaluating Effects of Dynamic Interventions to Control COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Guangdong, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Linggui Liu & Yi Zhao & Han Lyu & Sining Chen & Yuheng Tu & Shuyun Huang, 2023. "Spatial Accessibility and Equity Evaluation of Medical Facilities Based on Improved 2SFCA: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Wangtu (Ato) & Li, Yongling & Wang, Hui, 2016. "Transit accessibility for commuters considering the demand elasticities of distance and transfer," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 138-156.
    2. Tao, Zhuolin & Zhao, Min, 2023. "Planning for equal transit-based accessibility of healthcare facilities: A case study of Shenzhen, China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Chen, Wendong & Cheng, Long & Chen, Xuewu & Chen, Jingxu & Cao, Mengqiu, 2021. "Measuring accessibility to health care services for older bus passengers: A finer spatial resolution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Meihan Jin & Lu Liu & De Tong & Yongxi Gong & Yu Liu, 2019. "Evaluating the Spatial Accessibility and Distribution Balance of Multi-Level Medical Service Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Goliszek Sławomir, 2022. "The potential accessibility to workplaces and working-age population by means of public and private car transport in Szczecin," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 31-41, January.
    6. Xu, Mengya & Xin, Jing & Su, Shiliang & Weng, Min & Cai, Zhongliang, 2017. "Social inequalities of park accessibility in Shenzhen, China: The role of park quality, transport modes, and hierarchical socioeconomic characteristics," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 38-50.
    7. Sławomir Goliszek, 2021. "GIS tools and programming languages for creating models of public and private transport potential accessibility in Szczecin, Poland," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 115-137, January.
    8. Sharma, Gajanand & Patil, Gopal R., 2021. "Public transit accessibility approach to understand the equity for public healthcare services: A case study of Greater Mumbai," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Pritchard, John P. & Tomasiello, Diego Bogado & Giannotti, Mariana & Geurs, Karst, 2019. "Potential impacts of bike-and-ride on job accessibility and spatial equity in São Paulo, Brazil," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 386-400.
    10. Wang, Yafei & Chen, Bi Yu & Yuan, Hui & Wang, Donggen & Lam, William H.K. & Li, Qingquan, 2018. "Measuring temporal variation of location-based accessibility using space-time utility perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 13-24.
    11. Xinxin Zhou & Yuan Ding & Changbin Wu & Jing Huang & Chendi Hu, 2019. "Measuring the Spatial Allocation Rationality of Service Facilities of Residential Areas Based on Internet Map and Location-Based Service Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Li, Zhiming & Fan, Zhengxi & Song, Yan & Chai, Yangbo, 2021. "Assessing equity in park accessibility using a travel behavior-based G2SFCA method in Nanjing, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    13. Ying Chen & Jiale Wu, 2022. "The Effect of the Referral System on the Accessibility of Healthcare Services: A Case Study of the Wuhan Metropolitan Development Zone," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Stępniak, Marcin & Pritchard, John P. & Geurs, Karst T. & Goliszek, Sławomir, 2019. "The impact of temporal resolution on public transport accessibility measurement: Review and case study in Poland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 8-24.
    15. Wessel, Nate, 2019. "Accessibility Beyond the Schedule," SocArXiv c4yvx, Center for Open Science.
    16. Chen, Bi Yu & Cheng, Xue-Ping & Kwan, Mei-Po & Schwanen, Tim, 2020. "Evaluating spatial accessibility to healthcare services under travel time uncertainty: A reliability-based floating catchment area approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. Gao, Ya & Pan, Haixiao & Xie, Zhilin & Habib, Khandker Nurul, 2023. "Understanding patients heterogeneity in healthcare travel and hospital choice - A latent class analysis with covariates," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    18. Linlin Liu & Bohong Zheng & Chen Luo & Komi Bernard Bedra & Francis Masrabaye, 2022. "Access to City Center: Automobile vs. Public Transit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Jin, Tanhua & Cheng, Long & Wang, Kailai & Cao, Jun & Huang, Haosheng & Witlox, Frank, 2022. "Examining equity in accessibility to multi-tier healthcare services across different income households using estimated travel time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-13.
    20. Lou, Jiehong & Shen, Xingchi & Niemeier, Deb, 2020. "Are stay-at-home orders more difficult to follow for low-income groups?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6897-:d:831777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.