IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p213-d711165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mercy Procedure or a Nightmare? Attitude towards Pregnancy Termination among Polish University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Maciej Stokłosa

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Iga Stokłosa

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mateusz Porwolik

    (Department of Ophtalmology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-514 Katowice, Poland)

  • Maciej Bugajski

    (National Research Institute of Oncology, State Research Institute, 31-115 Krakow, Poland)

  • Gniewko Więckiewicz

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland)

  • Tomasz Męcik-Kronenberg

    (Department of Pathomorphology, Medical Univeristy of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland)

  • Magdalena Piegza

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland)

  • Robert Pudlo

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland)

  • Piotr Gorczyca

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland)

Abstract

Worldwide, there are about 121 million unintended pregnancies per year. The aim of the study was to assess the attitudes in different groups of students from 40 Polish universities towards pregnancy termination. In total, 9686 university students (20.1% male and 79.9% female) took part in our research. Questions about attitudes towards abortion in all possible circumstances were involved in the survey, which also included a socio-demographic questionnaire. Overall, 94.5% of women and 90.7% of men consider that abortion should be legal in the situation of a threat to the mother’s life, while only 52% of women and 38.7% of men accept it in the case of a hard financial situation for the mother. Most students stand for abortion in the situation of a threat to the mother’s life, in the case of rape, or in the case of a mortal fetus defect. Less than half of the students interviewed consider that abortion should be legal in the case of a hard financial situation for the mother or on the mother’s demand. People who declare a religious affiliation more often disagree with abortion, even in the hardest cases such as a danger to the mother’s life or a mortal fetus defect. The factor that influences the strongest on attitudes towards abortion is being an active Roman Catholic. The majority of students have a pro-choice attitude in respect of pregnancy termination.

Suggested Citation

  • Maciej Stokłosa & Iga Stokłosa & Mateusz Porwolik & Maciej Bugajski & Gniewko Więckiewicz & Tomasz Męcik-Kronenberg & Magdalena Piegza & Robert Pudlo & Piotr Gorczyca, 2021. "Mercy Procedure or a Nightmare? Attitude towards Pregnancy Termination among Polish University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:213-:d:711165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/213/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/213/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kornelia Zaręba & Stanisław Wójtowicz & Jolanta Banasiewicz & Krzysztof Herman & Grzegorz Jakiel, 2021. "The Influence of Abortion Law on the Frequency of Pregnancy Terminations—A Retrospective Comparative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Biggs, M.A. & Neuhaus, J.M. & Foster, D.G., 2015. "Mental health diagnoses 3 years after receiving or being denied an abortion in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(12), pages 2557-2563.
    3. Herd, P. & Higgins, J. & Sicinski, K. & Merkurieva, I., 2016. "The implications of unintended pregnancies for mental health in later life," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(3), pages 421-429.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iga Stokłosa & Maciej Stokłosa & Gniewko Więckiewicz & Mateusz Porwolik & Maciej Bugajski & Wilhelm Masarczyk & Tomasz Męcik-Kronenberg & Magdalena Piegza & Robert Pudlo & Piotr Gorczyca, 2022. "Analysis of Factors Influencing Polish Students’ Opinions on Euthanasia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aura Y. Rodríguez-Burbano & Diana M. Galván-Canchila & Rocío de Diego-Cordero, 2022. "Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices towards Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights of Girls among Colombian Healthcare Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Lucio Esposito & Sunil Mitra Kumar & Adrián Villaseñor, 2020. "The importance of being earliest: birth order and educational outcomes along the socioeconomic ladder in Mexico," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 1069-1099, July.
    3. Maria Sironi & George B. Ploubidis & Emily M. Grundy, 2020. "Fertility History and Biomarkers Using Prospective Data: Evidence From the 1958 National Child Development Study," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(2), pages 529-558, April.
    4. Jessica Houston Su & Fenaba R. Addo, 2018. "Born Without a Silver Spoon: Race, Wealth, and Unintended Childbearing," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 600-615, December.
    5. Sowmya Rajan & S. Philip Morgan & Kathleen Mullan Harris & David Guilkey & Sarah R. Hayford & Karen Benjamin Guzzo, 2017. "Trajectories of Unintended Fertility," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 36(6), pages 903-928, December.
    6. Ben-David, Vered & Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Bright, Charlotte & Drake, Brett, 2016. "Family formation: A positive outcome for vulnerable young women?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 57-66.
    7. Sara Yeatman & Emily Smith-Greenaway, 2021. "Women’s health decline following (some) unintended births: A prospective study," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(17), pages 547-576.
    8. Kornelia Zaręba & Valentina Lucia La Rosa & Stanisław Wójtowicz & Ewelina Kołb-Sielecka & Jolanta Banasiewicz & Michał Ciebiera & Grzegorz Jakiel, 2022. "The Opinions of Specialists in Obstetrics and Gynecology on the Indications for Pregnancy Termination in Poland—A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Fausta Ongaro & Valentina Tocchioni, 2021. "Adding up risks: Sexual debut and substance use among Italian university students," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2021_14, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    10. Karen Benjamin Guzzo, 2017. "Is Stepfamily Status Associated With Cohabiting and Married Women’s Fertility Behaviors?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(1), pages 45-70, February.
    11. Rocca, Corinne H. & Moseson, Heidi & Gould, Heather & Foster, Diana G. & Kimport, Katrina, 2021. "Emotions over five years after denial of abortion in the United States: Contextualizing the effects of abortion denial on women's health and lives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:213-:d:711165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.