IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12778-d694726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Escape Room vs. Traditional Assessment in Physiotherapy Students’ Anxiety, Stress and Gaming Experience: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Guadalupe Molina-Torres

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)

  • Irene Sandoval-Hernández

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Campus of Melilla, University of Granada, 52005 Melilla, Spain)

  • Carmen Ropero-Padilla

    (Pre-Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jaume I University, 12071 Castello de la Plana, Spain)

  • Miguel Rodriguez-Arrastia

    (Pre-Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jaume I University, 12071 Castello de la Plana, Spain)

  • Jesús Martínez-Cal

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)

  • Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain
    Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain)

Abstract

Escape Rooms can serve multiple academic and educational purposes and can be used as part of the evaluation of a learning program. The aim of this study was to analyze the levels of anxiety and stress perceived in the evaluation using the Escape Room compared to the traditional evaluation, as well as to analyze the gaming experience. Methods: A comparative study was carried out in students of the Degree in Physiotherapy, with a total of 56 participants who underwent 2 evaluation processes. The variables analyzed were the State—Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Perceived Stress Questionnaire, and the Gaming Experience Scale. A comparative analysis was performed between the groups using the Mann Whitney U test and Student’s T test. Results: The levels of state-anxiety and trait-anxiety were higher in the traditional assessment group. Although no differences were found in the qualification obtained by the students, statistically significant differences were found between the two evaluation systems in terms of the overload factor, the energy factor, and the fear-anxiety factor of the perceived stress questionnaire. Conclusions: The Escape Room can be considered as an alternative to the traditional evaluation in Physiotherapy Degree students due to its lower levels of anxiety and perceived stress.

Suggested Citation

  • Guadalupe Molina-Torres & Irene Sandoval-Hernández & Carmen Ropero-Padilla & Miguel Rodriguez-Arrastia & Jesús Martínez-Cal & Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez, 2021. "Escape Room vs. Traditional Assessment in Physiotherapy Students’ Anxiety, Stress and Gaming Experience: A Comparative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12778-:d:694726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12778/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12778/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jesús López-Belmonte & Adrian Segura-Robles & Arturo Fuentes-Cabrera & María Elena Parra-González, 2020. "Evaluating Activation and Absence of Negative Effect: Gamification and Escape Rooms for Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Eppmann, René & Bekk, Magdalena & Klein, Kristina, 2018. "Gameful Experience in Gamification: Construction and Validation of a Gameful Experience Scale [GAMEX]," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 98-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miao, Xiaoyu & Niu, Ben & Yang, Congcong & Feng, Yuanyue, 2023. "Examining the gamified effect of the blindbox design: The moderating role of price," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Hatice Doğan-Südaş & Ali Kara & Emre Karaca, 2023. "Effects of Gamified Mobile Apps on Purchase Intentions and Word-of-Mouth Engagement: Implications for Sustainability Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    3. An, Siyang & Cheung, Chi Fai & Willoughby, Kelvin W., 2024. "A gamification approach for enhancing older adults' technology adoption and knowledge transfer: A case study in mobile payments technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Pereira, Vijay & Islam, Nazrul & Giudice, Manlio Del & Choudrie, Jyoti, 2022. "Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Cristian Olivares-Rodríguez & Paula Villagra & Rodolfo E. Mardones & Luis Cárcamo-Ulloa & Nicolás Jaramillo, 2022. "Costa Resiliente: A Serious Game Co-Designed to Foster Resilience Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Ana López-Martínez & Lourdes Meroño & María Cánovas-López & Antonio García-de-Alcaraz & Luis Manuel Martínez-Aranda, 2022. "Using Gamified Strategies in Higher Education: Relationship between Intrinsic Motivation and Contextual Variables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Sungjin Park & Sangkyun Kim, 2022. "Identifying World Types to Deliver Gameful Experiences for Sustainable Learning in the Metaverse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Mian Wang & Jamie Marsden & Ezgi Oguz & Briony Thomas, 2023. "Exploring Sustainable Retail Experiences: Shall We Make It Fashionable?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Leclercq, Thomas & Poncin, Ingrid & Hammedi, Wafa, 2020. "Opening the black box of gameful experience: Implications for gamification process design," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    10. Thomas, Nibu John & Baral, Rupashree & Crocco, Oliver S. & Mohanan, Swathi, 2023. "A framework for gamification in the metaverse era: How designers envision gameful experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Högberg, Johan & Ramberg, Marcus Olsson & Gustafsson, Anders & Wästlund, Erik, 2019. "Creating brand engagement through in-store gamified customer experiences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 122-130.
    12. Flavio Boccia & Daniela Covino, 2024. "Knowledge and Food Sustainability: the Metaverse as a New Economic-Environmental Paradigm," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14841-14854, September.
    13. Flavio Boccia & Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka & Houman Hashemzadeh & Daniela Covino, 2023. "Metaverse, the last technological frontier of environmental sustainable food: Worldwide evidence from the first business case studies," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 153-165.
    14. Mao, Mengyu & Zhang, Lanxia & Li, Jiamin & Rivkin, Wladislaw, 2024. "My job is a game, and I am the owner: How gamification facilitates self-leadership for gig workers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    15. Wolf, Tobias & Weiger, Welf H. & Hammerschmidt, Maik, 2020. "Experiences that matter? The motivational experiences and business outcomes of gamified services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 353-364.
    16. Lubart, Allan & Capelli, Sonia, 2024. "Gamification of the point of sale using hybrid-reality games: Non-players' negative influence on players' service experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    17. Waqas, Muhammad & Salleh, Noor Akma Mohd & Hamzah, Zalfa Laili, 2021. "Branded Content Experience in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development, and Validation," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 106-120.
    18. Tatjana Sidekerskienė & Robertas Damaševičius, 2023. "Out-of-the-Box Learning: Digital Escape Rooms as a Metaphor for Breaking Down Barriers in STEM Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-33, April.
    19. Ana Manzano-León & Pablo Camacho-Lazarraga & Miguel A. Guerrero-Puerta & Laura Guerrero-Puerta & Antonio Alias & José M. Aguilar-Parra & Rubén Trigueros, 2021. "Development and Validation of a Questionnaire on Motivation for Cooperative Playful Learning Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, January.
    20. Jesús López-Belmonte & Adrian Segura-Robles & Arturo Fuentes-Cabrera & María Elena Parra-González, 2020. "Evaluating Activation and Absence of Negative Effect: Gamification and Escape Rooms for Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12778-:d:694726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.