IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12461-d688769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Force Model-Based Safety Evaluation of Intersections in Arterials Considering the Pedestrian Yield Rule

Author

Listed:
  • Jiao Yao

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Yuhang Li

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Jiaping He

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

Abstract

To enhance the safety of pedestrians crossing the street, a series of new regulations regarding pedestrian yield has been proposed and widely implemented across cities. In this study, we first made some improvements to the social force model, in which pedestrian crossing at the intersection, drivers’ psychology of giving way, vehicle yield to pedestrians, vehicle yield in different directions, the influence of pedestrians crossing boundaries, and signal lamp groups on pedestrian behavior were considered. Furthermore, pedestrian crossing and vehicle yield safety models were established, based on which the comprehensive safety evaluation model of intersections in arterials was established, in which two indices—(1) the safety degree of pedestrian crossings and (2) vehicle acceleration interference—were combined with the entropy weight method. Finally, four types of intersections in arterials were studied using a simulation: the intersections between different levels of arterials, and intersections with one-time and two-times pedestrian crossings. Moreover, safety evaluation and analysis of those intersections, considering the rule of pedestrian yield, were conducted combined with the trajectory data from the VISSIM simulation. The relevant results showed that for pedestrians crossing the street, the pedestrian safety of two-time crossing is significantly higher than that of one-time crossing, and compared with the arterial, the pedestrian crossing distance of the sub-arterial is shorter, and the pedestrian perception is safer. Moreover, due to the herd psychology effect, the increase in pedestrian flow volume improves the safety perception of pedestrians at the intersection.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiao Yao & Yuhang Li & Jiaping He, 2021. "Social Force Model-Based Safety Evaluation of Intersections in Arterials Considering the Pedestrian Yield Rule," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12461-:d:688769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12461/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12461/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Herman & Elliott W. Montroll & Renfrey B. Potts & Richard W. Rothery, 1959. "Traffic Dynamics: Analysis of Stability in Car Following," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 86-106, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Yuqing & Ge, Hongxia & Cheng, Rongjun, 2019. "An extended car-following model considering driver’s memory and average speed of preceding vehicles with control strategy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 752-761.
    2. Hiroshi Tatsumi & Masaya Kawano & Tetsunobu Yoshitake & Satoshi Toi & Yoshitaka Kajita, 2004. "Evaluation of City Planning Road Development Measures by Microscopic Traffic Simulation," ERSA conference papers ersa04p221, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2006. "In traffic flow, cellular automata = kinematic waves," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 396-403, June.
    4. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2006. "An Analytical Model for Traffic Delays and the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1151-1171, December.
    5. Rehborn, Hubert & Klenov, Sergey L. & Palmer, Jochen, 2011. "An empirical study of common traffic congestion features based on traffic data measured in the USA, the UK, and Germany," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4466-4485.
    6. Yao, Handong & Li, Qianwen & Li, Xiaopeng, 2020. "A study of relationships in traffic oscillation features based on field experiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 339-355.
    7. Yao, Zhihong & Xu, Taorang & Jiang, Yangsheng & Hu, Rong, 2021. "Linear stability analysis of heterogeneous traffic flow considering degradations of connected automated vehicles and reaction time," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 561(C).
    8. Bouadi, Marouane & Jia, Bin & Jiang, Rui & Li, Xingang & Gao, Zi-You, 2022. "Stability analysis of stochastic second-order macroscopic continuum models and numerical simulations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 193-209.
    9. Nagahama, Akihito & Wada, Takahiro & Yanagisawa, Daichi & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2021. "Detection of leader–follower combinations frequently observed in mixed traffic with weak lane-discipline," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 570(C).
    10. Hongxing Zhao & Ruichun He & Xiaoyan Jia, 2019. "Estimation and Analysis of Vehicle Exhaust Emissions at Signalized Intersections Using a Car-Following Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-25, July.
    11. Jafaripournimchahi, Ammar & Cai, Yingfeng & Wang, Hai & Sun, Lu & Yang, Biao, 2022. "Stability analysis of delayed-feedback control effect in the continuum traffic flow of autonomous vehicles without V2I communication," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 605(C).
    12. Kai Nagel & Peter Wagner & Richard Woesler, 2003. "Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 681-710, October.
    13. Yu (Marco) Nie & H. Michael Zhang, 2008. "Oscillatory Traffic Flow Patterns Induced by Queue Spillback in a Simple Road Network," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 236-248, May.
    14. Zhang, Xiaoyan & Jarrett, David F., 1997. "Stability analysis of the classical car-following model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 441-462, November.
    15. Jin, Wen-Long, 2013. "Stability and bifurcation in network traffic flow: A Poincaré map approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 191-208.
    16. Koutsopoulos, Haris N. & Farah, Haneen, 2012. "Latent class model for car following behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 563-578.
    17. Sun, Jie & Zheng, Zuduo & Sun, Jian, 2020. "The relationship between car following string instability and traffic oscillations in finite-sized platoons and its use in easing congestion via connected and automated vehicles with IDM based control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 58-83.
    18. Tian, Junfang & Treiber, Martin & Ma, Shoufeng & Jia, Bin & Zhang, Wenyi, 2015. "Microscopic driving theory with oscillatory congested states: Model and empirical verification," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 138-157.
    19. Chen, Danjue & Laval, Jorge & Zheng, Zuduo & Ahn, Soyoung, 2012. "A behavioral car-following model that captures traffic oscillations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 744-761.
    20. Jiang, Rui & Hu, Mao-Bin & Zhang, H.M. & Gao, Zi-You & Jia, Bin & Wu, Qing-Song, 2015. "On some experimental features of car-following behavior and how to model them," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 338-354.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12461-:d:688769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.