IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10292-d646762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Walking Comfort in Children’s School Travel at Street Scale: A Case Study in Tianjin (China)

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Zuo

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    Tianjin Laboratory of Creative Urban Design, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Tong Mu

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    Tianjin Laboratory of Creative Urban Design, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Tian-Yi Xiao

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Jian-Cheng Luo

    (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

(1) Background: school travel is an important part of a child’s daily activities. A comfortable walking environment can encourage children to walk to school. The existing methods of evaluating walking environments are not specific to children’s walks to school. (2) Methods: this study proposes a method of evaluating walking comfort in children traveling to school at street scale. Related indexes were selected that reflect children’s school travel behavior and their needs in street environments based on walking environment audit tools. Factor analysis was then used to calculate the relative weight of each index. (3) Results: the new evaluation method was tested in the neighborhoods around the First Central Primary School in Hedong District, Tianjin, China. The walking comfort for children’s school travel was evaluated in eight indexes: effective street width; street flatness; street cleanliness; interface diversity; buffer; shade coverage; green looking ratio; and sound decibels. Different classes and types of streets were found to have various vulnerabilities. (4) Conclusions: this evaluation method can accurately locate the weak spots in streets to improve the local policymakers’ perception of street environments, which can greatly facilitate the implementation of precise measures to promote children walking to school.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Zuo & Tong Mu & Tian-Yi Xiao & Jian-Cheng Luo, 2021. "Evaluation of Walking Comfort in Children’s School Travel at Street Scale: A Case Study in Tianjin (China)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10292-:d:646762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10292/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10292/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stewart, Orion & Vernez Moudon, Anne & Claybrooke, Charlotte, 2012. "Common ground: Eight factors that influence walking and biking to school," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 240-248.
    2. Tarek Al Shammas & Francisco Escobar, 2019. "Comfort and Time-Based Walkability Index Design: A GIS-Based Proposal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Ayse Ozbil & Demet Yesiltepe & Gorsev Argin & Greg Rybarczyk, 2021. "Children’s Active School Travel: Examining the Combined Perceived and Objective Built-Environment Factors from Space Syntax," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Mika R. Moran & Efrat Eizenberg & Pnina Plaut, 2017. "Getting to Know a Place: Built Environment Walkability and Children’s Spatial Representation of Their Home-School (h–s) Route," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Ayse Ozbil & Tugce Gurleyen & Demet Yesiltepe & Ezgi Zunbuloglu, 2019. "Comparative Associations of Street Network Design, Streetscape Attributes and Land-Use Characteristics on Pedestrian Flows in Peripheral Neighbourhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuhan Shao & Yuting Yin & Zhenying Xue & Dongbo Ma, 2023. "Assessing and Comparing the Visual Comfort of Streets across Four Chinese Megacities Using AI-Based Image Analysis and the Perceptive Evaluation Method," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ho Yeung Lam & Sisitha Jayasinghe & Kiran D. K. Ahuja & Andrew P. Hills, 2023. "Active School Commuting in School Children: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Future Research Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Liu, Yang & Min, Shisheng & Shi, Zhuangbin & He, Mingwei, 2024. "Exploring students' choice of active travel to school in different spatial environments: A case study in a mountain city," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Fernando Fonseca & George Papageorgiou & Simona Tondelli & Paulo Ribeiro & Elisa Conticelli & Mona Jabbari & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Perceived Walkability and Respective Urban Determinants: Insights from Bologna and Porto," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Javier Velázquez & Javier Infante & Inmaculada Gómez & Ana Hernando & Derya Gülçin & Fernando Herráez & Víctor Rincón & Rui Alexandre Castanho, 2023. "Walkability under Climate Pressure: Application to Three UNESCO World Heritage Cities in Central Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Jie Ding & Zhengdong Gao & Shanshan Ma, 2022. "Understanding Social Spaces in Tourist Villages through Space Syntax Analysis: Cases of Villages in Huizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Alessandro Venerandi & Hal Mellen & Ombretta Romice & Sergio Porta, 2024. "Walkability Indices—The State of the Art and Future Directions: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Yibang Zhang & Yukun Zou & Zhenjun Zhu & Xiucheng Guo & Xin Feng, 2022. "Evaluating Pedestrian Environment Using DeepLab Models Based on Street Walkability in Small and Medium-Sized Cities: Case Study in Gaoping, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Arlie Adkins & Carrie Makarewicz & Michele Scanze & Maia Ingram & Gretchen Luhr, 2017. "Contextualizing Walkability: Do Relationships Between Built Environments and Walking Vary by Socioeconomic Context?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(3), pages 296-314, July.
    9. Buckley, Aaron & Lowry, Michael B. & Brown, Helen & Barton, Benjamin, 2013. "Evaluating safe routes to school events that designate days for walking and bicycling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 294-300.
    10. Roussetos-Marios Stefanidis & Alexandros Bartzokas-Tsiompras, 2024. "Pedestrian Accessibility Analysis of Sidewalk-Specific Networks: Insights from Three Latin American Central Squares," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Pojani, Dorina & Nguyen, Thanh Chuong & Ha, Thanh Tung, 2021. "The impact of Covid-19 on children's active travel to school in Vietnam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Melody Smith & Suzanne Mavoa & Erika Ikeda & Kamyar Hasanzadeh & Jinfeng Zhao & Tiina E. Rinne & Niamh Donnellan & Marketta Kyttä & Jianqiang Cui, 2022. "Associations between Children’s Physical Activity and Neighborhood Environments Using GIS: A Secondary Analysis from a Systematic Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Yang, Wei & Hu, Jie & Liu, Yong & Guo, Wenbo, 2023. "Examining the influence of neighborhood and street-level built environment on fitness jogging in Chengdu, China: A massive GPS trajectory data analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    14. Haimei Li & Li Han & Yibin Ao & Yan Wang & Tong Wang, 2022. "Influences of the Built Environment on Rural School Children’s Travel Mode Choice: The Case of Chengdu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Greg Rybarczyk & Ayse Ozbil & Demet Yesiltepe & Gorsev Argin, 2023. "Walking alone or walking together: A spatial evaluation of children’s travel behavior to school," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(9), pages 2560-2578, November.
    16. Beata J. Gawryszewska & Izabela Myszka & Michał Banaszek & Axel Schwerk, 2023. "Periurban Streetscape—Vernacular Front Gardens and Their Potential to Provide Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Warsaw, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Daniel Orellana & Carla Hermida & Adriana Quezada & Jorge Andrade & Daniela Ballari, 2024. "Children’s Active Mobility to School: Evidence from Two Andean Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    18. Khaled J. Assi & Md Shafiullah & Kh Md Nahiduzzaman & Umer Mansoor, 2019. "Travel-To-School Mode Choice Modelling Employing Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    19. Silvia A. González & Olga L. Sarmiento & Pablo D. Lemoine & Richard Larouche & Jose D. Meisel & Mark S. Tremblay & Melisa Naranjo & Stephanie T. Broyles & Mikael Fogelholm & Gustavo A. Holguin & Estel, 2020. "Active School Transport among Children from Canada, Colombia, Finland, South Africa, and the United States: A Tale of Two Journeys," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Pérez-Martín, P. & Pedrós, G. & Martínez-Jiménez, P. & Varo-Martínez, M., 2018. "Evaluation of a walking school bus service as an intervention for a modal shift at a primary school in Spain," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-9.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10292-:d:646762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.