IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7661-d596942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Access to Health Care Services and Relevance of Telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas Reitzle

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany)

  • Christian Schmidt

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany)

  • Francesca Färber

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany)

  • Lena Huebl

    (Department of Tropical Medicine, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20359 Hamburg, Germany
    I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Lothar Heinz Wieler

    (Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany)

  • Thomas Ziese

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany)

  • Christin Heidemann

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, non-pharmaceutical interventions were imposed to contain the spread of the virus. Based on cross-sectional waves in March, July and December 2020 of the COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO), the present study investigated the impact of the introduced measures on the perceived access to health care. Additionally, for the wave in December, treatment occasion as well as utilization and satisfaction regarding telemedicine were analysed. For 18–74-year-old participants requiring medical care, descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed. During the less strict second lockdown in December, participants reported more frequently ensured access to health care (91.2%) compared to the first lockdown in March (86.8%), but less frequently compared to July (94.2%) during a period with only mild restrictions. In December, main treatment occasions of required medical appointments were check-up visits at the general practitioner (55.2%) and dentist (36.2%), followed by acute treatments at the general practitioner (25.6%) and dentist (19.0%), treatments at the physio-, ergo- or speech therapist (13.1%), psychotherapist (11.9%), and scheduled hospital admissions or surgeries (10.0%). Of the participants, 20.0% indicated utilization of telemedical (15.4% telephone, 7.6% video) consultations. Of them, 43.7% were satisfied with the service. In conclusion, for the majority of participants, access to medical care was ensured during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, access slightly decreased during phases of lockdown. Telemedicine complemented the access to medical appointments.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas Reitzle & Christian Schmidt & Francesca Färber & Lena Huebl & Lothar Heinz Wieler & Thomas Ziese & Christin Heidemann, 2021. "Perceived Access to Health Care Services and Relevance of Telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7661-:d:596942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7661/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7661/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André Hajek & Freia De Bock & Lothar H. Wieler & Philipp Sprengholz & Benedikt Kretzler & Hans-Helmut König, 2020. "Perceptions of Health Care Use in Germany during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Cylus, Jonathan & Papanicolas, Irene, 2015. "An analysis of perceived access to health care in Europe: How universal is universal coverage?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(9), pages 1133-1144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jule Räuchle & Peer Briken & Johanna Schröder & Olena Ivanova, 2022. "Sexual and Reproductive Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from a Cross-Sectional Online Survey in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonio Abatemarco & Massimo Aria & Sergio Beraldo & Michela Collaro, 2023. "Measuring Access and Inequality of Access to Health Care: a Policy-Oriented Decomposition," CSEF Working Papers 666, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    2. Kools, Lieke & Knoef, Marike, 2019. "Health and consumption preferences; estimating the health state dependence of utility using equivalence scales," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 46-62.
    3. Laura Levaggi & Rosella Levaggi, 2017. "Rationing in health care provision: a welfare approach," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 235-249, June.
    4. Federico Toth, 2020. "Going universal? The problem of the uninsured in Europe and in OECD countries," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 1193-1204, September.
    5. Pilar Zueras & Elisenda Rentería, 2020. "Trends in disease-free life expectancy at age 65 in Spain: Diverging patterns by sex, region and disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Lakomaa, Erik & Sanandaji, Tino, 2017. "Can Community Driven Care be integrated in the European Welfare System? Institutional Challenges and Historical Lessons," SSE Working Paper Series in Economic History 2017:3, Stockholm School of Economics.
    7. Antonio Abatemarco & Sergio Beraldo & Francesca Stroffolini, 2020. "Equality of opportunity in health care: access and equal access revisited," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 67(1), pages 13-29, March.
    8. Laura Levaggi & Rosella Levaggi, 2016. "Welfare analysis of rationing in health care provision," Working papers 39, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    9. Veronika Kočiš Krůtilová & Lewe Bahnsen, 2021. "Cost-Induced Unmet Need for Health Care among Europe's Older Adults - The Role of Specific Diseases," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 210-222.
    10. Bíró, Anikó & Prinz, Dániel, 2020. "Healthcare spending inequality: Evidence from Hungarian administrative data," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 282-290.
    11. Tao Zhang & Jing Liu & Chaojie Liu, 2019. "Changes in Perceived Accessibility to Healthcare from the Elderly between 2005 and 2014 in China: An Oaxaca–Blinder Decomposition Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-12, October.
    12. Šime Smolić & Ivan Čipin & Petra Međimurec, 2022. "Access to healthcare for people aged 50+ in Europe during the COVID-19 outbreak," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 793-809, December.
    13. Džakula, Aleksandar & Banadinović, Maja & Lovrenčić, Iva Lukačević & Vajagić, Maja & Dimova, Antoniya & Rohova, Maria & Minev, Mincho & Scintee, Silvia Gabriela & Vladescu, Cristian & Farcasanu, Dana , 2022. "A comparison of health system responses to COVID-19 in Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania in 2020," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(5), pages 456-464.
    14. Antonio Abatemarco & Massimo Aria & Sergio Beraldo & Francesca Stroffolini, 2020. "Measuring Disparities in Access to Health Care: A Proposal Based on an Ex-ante Perspective," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 549-568, July.
    15. Mladovsky, Philipa, 2023. "Mental health coverage for forced migrants: Managing failure as everyday governance in the public and NGO sectors in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    16. Luis Miguel Bello-Lujan & Jose Antonio Serrano-Sanchez & Juan Jose Gonzalez-Henriquez, 2022. "Stable Gender Gap and Similar Gender Trend in Chronic Morbidities between 1997–2015 in Adult Canary Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Jens Hoebel & Alexander Rommel & Sara Lena Schröder & Judith Fuchs & Enno Nowossadeck & Thomas Lampert, 2017. "Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health and Perceived Unmet Needs for Healthcare among the Elderly in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Antonio Abatemarco & Sergio Beraldo & Francesca Stroffolini, 2016. "A Resource-Sensitive Framework for Defining and Measuring Equality of Opportunity in Health," CSEF Working Papers 437, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    19. Natasa Popovic & Zorica Terzic-Supic & Snezana Simic & Biljana Mladenovic, 2017. "Predictors of unmet health care needs in Serbia; Analysis based on EU-SILC data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Landi, Stefano & Ivaldi, Enrico & Testi, Angela, 2018. "Socioeconomic status and waiting times for health services: An international literature review and evidence from the Italian National Health System," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(4), pages 334-351.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7661-:d:596942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.