IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p7172-d588441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review of the Current Measures of Theory of Mind in Adults with Schizophrenia

Author

Listed:
  • Ya-Chin Yeh

    (Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
    Department of Occupational Therapy, Shu-Zen Junior College of Medicine and Management, Kaohsiung 821004, Taiwan)

  • Chung-Ying Lin

    (Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
    Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
    Department of Public Health, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan)

  • Ping-Chia Li

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 824005, Taiwan)

  • Chi-Fa Hung

    (Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833401, Taiwan
    College of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912301, Taiwan)

  • Chun-Hua Cheng

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital, Kaohsiung 802211, Taiwan)

  • Ming-Hui Kuo

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital, Kaohsiung 802211, Taiwan)

  • Kuan-Lin Chen

    (Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
    Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan)

Abstract

Adults with schizophrenia usually have impairments in theory of mind (ToM), which subsequently cause them problems in social interaction. Therefore, it is important for healthcare providers to assess their ToM using adequate measures. This systematic review evaluated current ToM measures (or ToM tasks) for adults with schizophrenia and summarized their specific characteristics, including the concept and construct, administration, and psychometric properties. From a review of 117 articles, 13 types of ToM tasks were identified, and the findings from these articles were qualitatively synthesized. The results showed that ToM tasks are diverse in their presentation modalities, answer modes, strategies of controlling cognitive confounders, and scoring. Most tasks employ cognitive and affective dimensions and target a specific, single ToM concept. The present systematic review found that psychometric evidence supporting the ToM tasks, such as internal consistency, test–retest reliability, unidimensionality, and convergent, criterion, and ecological validities, is insufficient. Based on the results, we propose several principles for selecting appropriate ToM tasks in practice, e.g., selecting a task with multiple ToM concepts, or an exclusive ToM construct containing the cognitive and affective dimensions. Moreover, future studies are needed to provide more psychometric evidence on each type of ToM task applied in people with schizophrenia.

Suggested Citation

  • Ya-Chin Yeh & Chung-Ying Lin & Ping-Chia Li & Chi-Fa Hung & Chun-Hua Cheng & Ming-Hui Kuo & Kuan-Lin Chen, 2021. "A Systematic Review of the Current Measures of Theory of Mind in Adults with Schizophrenia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7172-:d:588441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey C. Valentine & Therese D. Pigott & Hannah R. Rothstein, 2010. "How Many Studies Do You Need?," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(2), pages 215-247, April.
    2. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Habarurema Jean Baptiste & Yan Guang Cai & A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam & Nzabalirwa Wenceslas, 2022. "A Systematic Review of University Social Responsibility in Post-Conflict Societies: The Case of the Great Lakes Region of East Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 439-475, November.
    2. Valérie Benoit & Piera Gabola, 2021. "Effects of Positive Psychology Interventions on the Well-Being of Young Children: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Sandra Feijóo & Raquel Rodríguez-Fernández, 2021. "A Meta-Analytical Review of Gender-Based School Bullying in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Olesya Falenchuk & Michal Perlman & Evelyn McMullen & Brooke Fletcher & Prakesh S Shah, 2017. "Education of staff in preschool aged classrooms in child care centers and child outcomes: A meta-analysis and systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-33, August.
    5. Stefano Corbella & Paolo Veronesi & Viviana Galimberti & Roberto Weinstein & Massimo Del Fabbro & Luca Francetti, 2018. "Is periodontitis a risk indicator for cancer? A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Vincent T Janmaat & Sophie H van Olphen & Katharina E Biermann & Leendert H J Looijenga & Marco B Bruno & Manon C W Spaander, 2017. "Use of immunohistochemical biomarkers as independent predictor of neoplastic progression in Barrett's oesophagus surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Xiu Yun Wu & Wen Qiang Yin & Hong Wei Sun & Shu Xiang Yang & Xin Yang Li & Hong Qing Liu, 2019. "The association between disordered eating and health-related quality of life among children and adolescents: A systematic review of population-based studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Diane Maria Johnson & Justin Roberts & Dan Gordon, 2019. "The acute effects of whole blood donation on cardiorespiratory and haematological factors in exercise: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Yusi Gong & Taylor P Trentadue & Swastina Shrestha & Elena Losina & Jamie E Collins, 2018. "Financial incentives for objectively-measured physical activity or weight loss in adults with chronic health conditions: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Francles Blanco-Guillot & Guadalupe Delgado-Sánchez & Norma Mongua-Rodríguez & Pablo Cruz-Hervert & Leticia Ferreyra-Reyes & Elizabeth Ferreira-Guerrero & Mercedes Yanes-Lane & Rogelio Montero-Campos , 2017. "Molecular clustering of patients with diabetes and pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Nahia Idoiaga Mondragon & Idoia Legorburu Fernandez & Naiara Ozamiz-Etxebarria & Beatriz Villagrasa & Javier Santabárbara, 2023. "PTSD (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder) in Teachers: A Mini Meta-Analysis during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    12. Anshuka Anshuka & Floris F. van Ogtrop & R. Willem Vervoort, 2019. "Drought forecasting through statistical models using standardised precipitation index: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(2), pages 955-977, June.
    13. Alicia J Foxx & Florian Fort, 2019. "Root and shoot competition lead to contrasting competitive outcomes under water stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, December.
    14. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    15. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    16. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    18. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    19. Nadine Desrochers & Adèle Paul‐Hus & Jen Pecoskie, 2017. "Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2821-2833, December.
    20. Alene Sze Jing Yong & Yi Heng Lim & Mark Wing Loong Cheong & Ednin Hamzah & Siew Li Teoh, 2022. "Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 1037-1057, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7172-:d:588441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.