IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i11p6019-d568316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical Liability: Review of a Whole Year of Judgments of the Civil Court of Rome

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Treglia

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Margherita Pallocci

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Pierluigi Passalacqua

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Jacopo Giammatteo

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Lucilla De Luca

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Silvestro Mauriello

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Alberto Michele Cisterna

    (XIII Section, Civil Court of Rome, 00192 Rome, Italy)

  • Luigi Tonino Marsella

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Background: Complaints about medical malpractice have increased over time in Italy, as well as other countries around the world. This scenario, perceived by some as a “malpractice crisis”, is a subject of debate in health law and medical law. The costs arising from medical liability lawsuits weigh not only on individual professionals but also on the budgets of healthcare facilities, many of which in Italy are supported by public funds. A full understanding of the phenomenon of medical malpractice appears necessary in order to manage this spreading issue and possibly to reduce the health liability costs. Methods: The retrospective review concerned all the judgments drawn up by the Judges of the Civil Court of Rome, XIII Chamber (competent and specialized section for professional liability trials) published between January 2018 and February 2019. Results: The analysis of data concerning the involved parties showed that in 84.6% of the judgments taken into account, one or more health facilities were sued, while in 58.2% of cases, one or more health workers were present among the defendants. When healthcare providers are the only ones to be summoned, it is dentists and aesthetic doctors/plastic surgeons who undergo most of the claims. In the overall period analyzed, the amount paid was 23,489,254.08 EUR with an average of 163,119.82 EUR. Conclusion: The evidence provided by the reported data is a useful tool to understand medical malpractice in Italy, especially with regard to the occurrence of the phenomenon at a legal level, an aspect still hardly mentioned by existing literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Treglia & Margherita Pallocci & Pierluigi Passalacqua & Jacopo Giammatteo & Lucilla De Luca & Silvestro Mauriello & Alberto Michele Cisterna & Luigi Tonino Marsella, 2021. "Medical Liability: Review of a Whole Year of Judgments of the Civil Court of Rome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:6019-:d:568316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/6019/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/6019/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buzzacchi, Luigi & Scellato, Giuseppe & Ughetto, Elisa, 2016. "Frequency of medical malpractice claims: The effects of volumes and specialties," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 152-160.
    2. Marco Bonetti & Pasquale Cirillo & Paola Musile Tanzi & Elisabetta Trinchero, 2016. "An Analysis of the Number of Medical Malpractice Claims and Their Amounts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-30, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crevecoeur, Jonas & Antonio, Katrien & Verbelen, Roel, 2019. "Modeling the number of hidden events subject to observation delay," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 930-944.
    2. Raffaele La Russa & Rocco Valerio Viola & Stefano D’Errico & Mariarosaria Aromatario & Aniello Maiese & Paolo Anibaldi & Christian Napoli & Paola Frati & Vittorio Fineschi, 2021. "Analysis of Inadequacies in Hospital Care through Medical Liability Litigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-10, March.
    3. Bertoli, Paola & Grembi, Veronica, 2019. "Malpractice risk and medical treatment selection," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 22-35.
    4. Alberto Sardi & Enrico Sorano & Letizia Agostini & Anna Guerrieri & Mirella Angaramo & Franco Ripa, 2020. "L?analisi a priori del rischio sanitario in Regione Piemonte: applicazione del metodo Cartorisk sull?area materno-infantile," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(114), pages 67-88.
    5. Castro, Massimo Finocchiaro & Ferrara, Paolo Lorenzo & Guccio, Calogero & Lisi, Domenico, 2019. "Medical malpractice liability and physicians’ behavior: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 646-666.
    6. Nassim Dehouche, 2021. "Scale matters: The daily, weekly and monthly volatility and predictability of Bitcoin, Gold, and the S&P 500," Papers 2103.00395, arXiv.org.
    7. Tomasz Leśniak & Aleksandra Sierocka & Dariusz Kostrzewa & Remigiusz Kozłowski & Michał Marczak, 2022. "Financial Expenses and “Losses” of the Polish Healthcare System Resulting from the Occurrence of Adverse Events," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:6019-:d:568316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.