IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i22p8373-d443922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Research Centers in Minority Institutions: Framework, Metrics, Best Practices, and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Sy

    (Department of Tropical Medicine, Medical Microbiology, and Pharmacology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA)

  • Traci Hayes

    (Department of Public Health, School of Health Professions, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA)

  • Kelly Laurila

    (Department of Anthropology, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA)

  • Carlamarie Noboa

    (Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, 00938 San Juan, Puerto Rico)

  • Robbert J. Langwerden

    (Community-Based Research Institute, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Michelle M. Hospital

    (Department of Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Doris A. Andújar-Pérez

    (Ponce Research Institute, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00732, Puerto Rico)

  • Lakesha Stevenson

    (Center for Cancer Research and Therapeutic Development, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA 30314, USA)

  • Suzanne M. Randolph Cunningham

    (Center for Community Prevention and Treatment Research, Division of Research and Evaluation, The MayaTech Corporation, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA)

  • Latrice Rollins

    (Department of Community Health and Preventive Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA)

  • Hala Madanat

    (Division of Research and Innovation, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA)

  • Tanya Penn

    (Institute of Public Health, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA)

  • Shiva Mehravaran

    (Department of Computer Science, School of Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD 21251, USA)

Abstract

The NIH-funded Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) program is currently funding 18 academic institutions to strengthen the research environment and contribution to health disparities research. The purpose of this multiphase mixed-methods study was to establish a uniform evaluation framework for demonstrating the collective success of this research consortium. Methods included discussions of aims and logic models at the RCMI Evaluators’ Workshop, a literature review to inform an evaluation conceptual framework, and a case study survey to obtain evaluation-related information and metrics. Ten RCMIs participated in the workshop and 14 submitted responses to the survey. The resultant RCMI Evaluation Conceptual Model presents a practical ongoing approach to document RCMIs’ impacts on health disparities. Survey results identified 37 common metrics under four primary categories. Evaluation challenges were issues related to limited human resources, data collection, decision-making, defining metrics, cost-sharing, and revenue-generation. There is a need for further collaborative efforts across RCMI sites to engage program leadership and community stakeholders in addressing the identified evaluation challenges and measurement. Program leadership should be engaged to apply the Evaluation Conceptual Framework and common metrics to allow for valid inter-institutional comparisons and consortium-wide evaluations. Stakeholders could ensure evaluation metrics are used to facilitate community impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Sy & Traci Hayes & Kelly Laurila & Carlamarie Noboa & Robbert J. Langwerden & Michelle M. Hospital & Doris A. Andújar-Pérez & Lakesha Stevenson & Suzanne M. Randolph Cunningham & Latrice Rollin, 2020. "Evaluating Research Centers in Minority Institutions: Framework, Metrics, Best Practices, and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8373-:d:443922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trotter II, Robert T. & Laurila, Kelly & Alberts, David & Huenneke, Laura F., 2015. "A diagnostic evaluation model for complex research partnerships with community engagement: The partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention (NACP) model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 10-20.
    2. Jordi Molas-Gallart & Pablo D’Este & Oscar Llopis & Ismael Rafols, 2016. "Towards an alternative framework for the evaluation of translational research initiatives," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 235-243.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Yanagihara & Marla J. Berry & Monica J. Carson & Sandra P. Chang & Heather Corliss & Marc B. Cox & Georges Haddad & Christine Hohmann & Scott T. Kelley & Eun Sook Yu Lee & Bruce G. Link & Rich, 2021. "Building a Diverse Workforce and Thinkforce to Reduce Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Jerris R. Hedges & Karam F. A. Soliman & William M. Southerland & Gene D’Amour & Emma Fernández-Repollet & Shafiq A. Khan & Deepak Kumar & Cecilia M. Shikuma & Brian M. Rivers & Clayton C. Yates & Ric, 2021. "Strengthening and Sustaining Inter-Institutional Research Collaborations and Partnerships," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Paul B. Tchounwou & Mohamad Malouhi & Elizabeth O. Ofili & Emma Fernández-Repollet & Daniel F. Sarpong & Richard Yanagihara & Renato J. Aguilera & Cecilia Ayón & Xiaoxin Chen & Asok Dasmahapatra & Son, 2022. "Research Infrastructure Core Facilities at Research Centers in Minority Institutions: Part I—Research Resources Management, Operation, and Best Practices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Tabia Henry Akintobi & Payam Sheikhattari & Emma Shaffer & Christina L. Evans & Kathryn L. Braun & Angela U. Sy & Bibiana Mancera & Adriana Campa & Stephania T. Miller & Daniel Sarpong & Rhonda Hollid, 2021. "Community Engagement Practices at Research Centers in U.S. Minority Institutions: Priority Populations and Innovative Approaches to Advancing Health Disparities Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Yulia A. Levites Strekalova & Diana L. Kornetti & Ruixuan Wang & Adriana Báez & Lee S. Caplan & Muhammed Y. Idris & Kimberly Lawson & Jada Holmes & Mohamed Mubasher & Priscilla Pemu & Jonathan K. Stil, 2023. "Individual and Institutional Factors Contribute to Research Capacity Building for Early-Stage Investigators from Groups Underrepresented in Biomedical Research: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-11, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Munari, Federico & Toschi, Laura, 2021. "The impact of public funding on science valorisation: an analysis of the ERC Proof-of-Concept Programme," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(6).
    2. Yuxian Liu & Ewelina Biskup & Yueqian Wang & Fengfeng Cai & Xiaoyan Zhang, 2020. "A new territory and its pioneer: opening up a dominant research stream for a translational research area," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1213-1228, November.
    3. Alexander D. Rushforth & Sarah de Rijcke, 2017. "Quality monitoring in transition: The challenge of evaluating translational research programs in academic biomedicine," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 513-523.
    4. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Nicola Melluso & Francesco Alessandro Massucci, 2022. "Exploring the antecedents of interdisciplinarity at the European Research Council: a topic modeling approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 6961-6991, December.
    5. Cian O’Donovan & Aleksandra (Ola) Michalec & Joshua R Moon, 2022. "Capabilities for transdisciplinary research," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 145-158.
    6. Gloria Naranjo-Africano & Jaider Vega-Jurado & Liney Manjarres-Henríquez, 2023. "Barriers to Third Mission: organizational and individual antecedents," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8373-:d:443922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.