IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i16p5789-d397059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Geographic Information System-Based Indicator of Waste Risk to Investigate the Health Impact of Landfills and Uncontrolled Dumping Sites

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Fazzo

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Marco De Santis

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Eleonora Beccaloni

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Federica Scaini

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Ivano Iavarone

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Pietro Comba

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Domenico Airoma

    (North Naples Prosecution Office, 81031 Aversa, Italy)

Abstract

Uncontrolled and poor waste management practices are widespread. The global health impact of hazardous waste exposure is controversial, but the excess of some diseases appears to be consistent. The Geographic Information System (GIS, ESRI Inc., Rome, Italy) method used to estimate the waste risk exposure, in an area with many illegal waste dumps and burning sites, is described. A GIS geodatabase (ESRI ArcGIS format) of waste sites’ data was built. A municipal GIS-based indicator of waste risk (Municipal Risk Index: MRI) has been computed, based on type and quantity of waste, typology of waste disposal, known or potential environmental contamination by waste and population living near waste sites. 2767 waste sites were present in an area 426 km 2 large. 38% of the population lived near one or more waste sites (100 m). Illegal/uncontrolled waste dumps, including waste burning areas, constituted about 90% of all sites. The 38 investigated municipalities were categorized into 4 classes of MRI. The GIS approach identified a widespread impact of waste sites and the municipalities likely to be most exposed. The highest score of the MRI included the municipalities with the most illegal hazardous waste dumps and burning sites. The GIS-geodatabase provided information to contrast and to prosecute illegal waste trafficking and mismanagements.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Fazzo & Marco De Santis & Eleonora Beccaloni & Federica Scaini & Ivano Iavarone & Pietro Comba & Domenico Airoma, 2020. "A Geographic Information System-Based Indicator of Waste Risk to Investigate the Health Impact of Landfills and Uncontrolled Dumping Sites," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5789-:d:397059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5789/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5789/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pearce, N., 1996. "Traditional epidemiology, modern epidemiology, and public health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(5), pages 678-683.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ronald B. Brown, 2022. "Transdisciplinary model for environmental protection and primordial prevention of disease," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(4), pages 898-904, December.
    2. Francesco Forastiere, 2010. "Climate change and health: a challenge for epidemiology and public health," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(2), pages 83-84, April.
    3. Melissa Chinchilla & Mariana C. Arcaya, 2017. "Using Health Impact Assessment as an Interdisciplinary Teaching Tool," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Ritu Priya & Amitabha Sarkar & Sayan Das & Rakhal Gaitonde & Prachinkumar Ghodajkar & Mohit P. Gandhi, 2023. "Questioning global health in the times of COVID-19: Re-imagining primary health care through the lens of politics of knowledge," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Wei Xun & Aneire Khan & Edwin Michael & Paolo Vineis, 2010. "Climate change epidemiology: methodological challenges," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(2), pages 85-96, April.
    6. Elisabeth Marks & Margaret Cargo & Mark Daniel, 2007. "Constructing A Health And Social Indicator Framework For Indigenous Community Health Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 93-110, May.
    7. João Delgado & Simon Pollard & Emma Snary & Edgar Black & George Prpich & Phil Longhurst, 2013. "A Systems Approach to the Policy‐Level Risk Assessment of Exotic Animal Diseases: Network Model and Application to Classical Swine Fever," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(8), pages 1454-1472, August.
    8. Roberts, Eric T. & Matthews, Derrick D., 2012. "HIV and chemoprophylaxis, the importance of considering social structures alongside biomedical and behavioral intervention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(9), pages 1555-1561.
    9. Kate Clancy, 1997. "1996 Presidential address to the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 14(2), pages 111-114, June.
    10. Mark Daniel & Margaret Cargo & Elisabeth Marks & Catherine Paquet & David Simmons & Margaret Williams & Kevin Rowley & Kerin O’Dea, 2009. "Rating Health and Social Indicators for Use with Indigenous Communities: A Tool for Balancing Cultural and Scientific Utility," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 241-256, November.
    11. Blakely, Tony & Tobias, Martin & Robson, Bridget & Ajwani, Shilpi & Bonné, Martin & Woodward, Alistair, 2005. "Widening ethnic mortality disparities in New Zealand 1981-99," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(10), pages 2233-2251, November.
    12. Zimmerman, Frederick J., 2013. "Habit, custom, and power: A multi-level theory of population health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 47-56.
    13. van Herten, Loes M. & Gunning-Schepers, Louise J., 2000. "Targets as a tool in health policy: Part I: lessons learned," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Aparna Lal, 2016. "Spatial Modelling Tools to Integrate Public Health and Environmental Science, Illustrated with Infectious Cryptosporidiosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-8, February.
    15. Acolin, Jessica & Fishman, Paul, 2023. "Beyond the biomedical, towards the agentic: A paradigm shift for population health science," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5789-:d:397059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.