IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3588-d360611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appropriate Employment for Segregated Roma: Mechanisms in a Public–Private Partnership Project

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Bosakova

    (Department of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Medical Faculty, P.J. Safarik University in Kosice, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11 Kosice, Slovakia
    Olomouc University Society and Health Institute, Palacky University in Olomouc, Univerzitni 22, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic
    Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Andrea Madarasova Geckova

    (Department of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Medical Faculty, P.J. Safarik University in Kosice, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11 Kosice, Slovakia
    Olomouc University Society and Health Institute, Palacky University in Olomouc, Univerzitni 22, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic)

  • Jitse P. van Dijk

    (Olomouc University Society and Health Institute, Palacky University in Olomouc, Univerzitni 22, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic
    Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Sijmen A. Reijneveld

    (Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Our earlier article showed that increased employability of segregated Roma may improve their well-being and health. To achieve that, appropriate employment based on a public–private partnership could be the key. For optimal design of such a partnership, we need insight into its potential mechanisms. Evidence on this is lacking, however. This paper builds on the previously published article by focusing on mechanisms for achieving better health. Therefore, our aim was to identify the potential mechanisms by which a public–private Roma employment project could increase employability. We investigated a Roma employment project called Equality of Opportunity established by a private company, U.S. Steel Kosice in eastern Slovakia. We conducted a multi-perspective qualitative study to obtain key stakeholders’ perspectives on the potential mechanisms of a public–private Roma employment project in terms of increased employability. We found three types of mechanisms. The first type regarded formal job mechanisms, such as an appropriate employment and salary offer and a bottom-up approach in capacity building. The second type involved sustainability mechanisms, such as the personal profile of project and work-shift coordinators, the continuous offer of training and cooperation with relevant stakeholders (municipalities, community centers, etc.). The third type was cultural mechanisms, such as personal contact with project participants, attention to less-voiced groups like children, the motivation of project participants, a counter-value reciprocity approach and respect for the specifics of Roma history. Our findings imply that policymakers could consider public–private partnerships for increasing the employability of segregated Roma, as they have the potential to address a wider range of social needs simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Bosakova & Andrea Madarasova Geckova & Jitse P. van Dijk & Sijmen A. Reijneveld, 2020. "Appropriate Employment for Segregated Roma: Mechanisms in a Public–Private Partnership Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3588-:d:360611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3588/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3588/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dahlgren, Göran & Whitehead, Margaret, 1991. "Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Background document to WHO - Strategy paper for Europe," Arbetsrapport 2007:14, Institute for Futures Studies.
    2. Paluck, Elizabeth Levy & Green, Seth A. & Green, Donald P., 2019. "The contact hypothesis re-evaluated," Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 129-158, November.
    3. Lucia Bosakova & Andrea Madarasova Geckova & Jitse P. van Dijk & Sijmen A. Reijneveld, 2019. "Increased Employment for Segregated Roma May Improve Their Health: Outcomes of a Public–Private Partnership Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Niall O'Higgins & Andrey Ivanov, 2006. "Education and Employment Opportunities for the Roma," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 48(1), pages 6-19, March.
    5. Andrej Belak & Andrea Madarasova Geckova & Jitse P. van Dijk & Sijmen A. Reijneveld, 2018. "Why don’t segregated Roma do more for their health? An explanatory framework from an ethnographic study in Slovakia," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(9), pages 1123-1131, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai Barron & Heike Harmgart & Steffen Huck & Sebastian O. Schneider & Matthias Sutter, 2023. "Discrimination, Narratives, and Family History: An Experiment with Jordanian Host and Syrian Refugee Children," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(4), pages 1008-1016, July.
    2. Barbara Pavlikova & Lenka Freel & Jitse P. van Dijk, 2020. "To Comply or Not to Comply: Roma Approach to Health Laws," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Bagues, Manuel & Roth, Christopher, 2020. "Interregional Contact and National Identity," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 526, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    4. Tudorel ANDREI & Andreea MIRICĂ & Daniel TEODORESCU & Elena-Doina DASCĂLU, 2016. "Main Determinants of Labor Force Participation in the case of Metropolitan Roma People," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 144-163, September.
    5. Intima Alrimawi & Michael Craig Watson & Carol Hall & Ahmad Rajeh Saifan, 2019. "Preventing Unintentional Injuries to Children Under 5 in Their Homes: Palestinian Mothers’ Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440188, January.
    6. Lucia Bosakova & Andrea Madarasova Geckova & Jitse P. van Dijk & Sijmen A. Reijneveld, 2019. "Increased Employment for Segregated Roma May Improve Their Health: Outcomes of a Public–Private Partnership Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Jayeun Kim & Kyuhyun Yoon, 2020. "Municipal Residence Level of Long-Term PM 10 Exposure Associated with Obesity among Young Adults in Seoul, Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Mariusz Duplaga, 2020. "The Use of Fitness Influencers’ Websites by Young Adult Women: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Andreea-Oana IACOBUTA & Livia BACIU & Alina-Mariuca IONESCU & Gabriel Claudiu MURSA, 2015. "Socioeconomic Inequalities In Self-Perceived Health In Romania," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(Special i), pages 209-224, September.
    10. Exeter, Daniel John & Rodgers, Sarah & Sabel, Clive Eric, 2014. "“Whose data is it anyway?” The implications of putting small area-level health and social data online," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 88-96.
    11. Alberto Alesina & Marco Tabellini, 2024. "The Political Effects of Immigration: Culture or Economics?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 5-46, March.
    12. Stephen Birch, 1999. "The 39 steps: the mystery of health inequalities in the UK," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(4), pages 301-308, June.
    13. Séverine Deguen & Wahida Kihal-Talantikite, 2021. "Geographical Pattern of COVID-19-Related Outcomes over the Pandemic Period in France: A Nationwide Socio-Environmental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Josep Lloret & Rafael Abós-Herràndiz & Sílvia Alemany & Rosario Allué & Joan Bartra & Maria Basagaña & Elisa Berdalet & Mònica Campàs & Arnau Carreño & Montserrat Demestre & Jorge Diogène & Eva Fontde, 2020. "The Roses Ocean and Human Health Chair: A New Way to Engage the Public in Oceans and Human Health Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Achard, Pascal & Suetens, Sigrid, 2023. "The Causal Effect of Ethnic Diversity on Support for Redistribution and the Role of Discrimination," Other publications TiSEM a5e6e0cd-5e07-4a24-a15c-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Paul Vertier & Max Viskanic & Matteo Gamalerio, 2020. "Dismantling the 'Jungle' : Relocation and Extreme Voting in France," Sciences Po publications 110, Sciences Po.
    17. Oded Stark & Ruxanda Berlinschi, 2021. "Community influence as an explanatory factor why Roma children get little schooling," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 93-114, October.
    18. Juliana Londoño-Vélez, 2022. "The Impact of Diversity on Perceptions of Income Distribution and Preferences for Redistribution," NBER Working Papers 30386, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Getachew, Abis & Höckel, Lisa Sofie & Kuhnt, Jana & Muhumad, Abdirahman A. & von Schiller, Armin, 2023. "Improving employment and social cohesion among refugee and host communities through TVET: evidence from an impact assessment in Ethiopia," IDOS Policy Briefs 26/2023, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bonn.
    20. Betts, Alexander & Flinder Stierna, Maria & Omata, Naohiko & Sterck, Olivier, 2023. "Refugees welcome? Inter-group interaction and host community attitude formation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3588-:d:360611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.