IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v16y2024i6p214-d1416561.html

Adaptive Framework for Maintenance Scheduling Based on Dynamic Preventive Intervals and Remaining Useful Life Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Nunes

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Eugénio Rocha

    (Department of Mathematics, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • José Santos

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Centre for Mechanical Technology and Automation, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

Data-based prognostic methods exploit sensor data to forecast the remaining useful life (RUL) of industrial settings to optimize the scheduling of maintenance actions. However, implementing sensors may not be cost-effective or practical for all components. Traditional preventive approaches are not based on sensor data; however, they schedule maintenance at equally spaced intervals, which is not a cost-effective approach since the distribution of the time between failures changes with the degradation state of other parts or changes in working conditions. This study introduces a novel framework comprising two maintenance scheduling strategies. In the absence of sensor data, we propose a novel dynamic preventive policy that adjusts intervention intervals based on the most recent failure data. When sensor data are available, a method for RUL prediction, designated k-LSTM-GFT, is enhanced to dynamically account for RUL prediction uncertainty. The results demonstrate that dynamic preventive maintenance can yield cost reductions of up to 51.8% compared to conventional approaches. The predictive approach optimizes the exploitation of RUL, achieving costs that are only 3–5% higher than the minimum cost achievable while ensuring the safety of critical systems since all of the failures are avoided.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Nunes & Eugénio Rocha & José Santos, 2024. "Adaptive Framework for Maintenance Scheduling Based on Dynamic Preventive Intervals and Remaining Useful Life Estimation," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:214-:d:1416561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/6/214/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/6/214/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cai, Yue & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram, 2023. "A data-driven approach for condition-based maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 730-738.
    2. Shi, Yue & Zhu, Weihang & Xiang, Yisha & Feng, Qianmei, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems subject to a system reliability requirement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Dui, Hongyan & Zhang, Hao & Wu, Shaomin, 2023. "Optimisation of maintenance policies for a deteriorating multi-component system under external shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    4. Hesabi, Hadis & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Hajji, Adnène, 2022. "A deep learning predictive model for selective maintenance optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. Robin P. Nicolai & Rommert Dekker, 2008. "Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 11, pages 263-286, Springer.
    6. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2022. "Multi-objective design of aircraft maintenance using Gaussian process learning and adaptive sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    7. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    8. de Pater, Ingeborg & Reijns, Arthur & Mitici, Mihaela, 2022. "Alarm-based predictive maintenance scheduling for aircraft engines with imperfect Remaining Useful Life prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    9. de Pater, Ingeborg & Mitici, Mihaela, 2021. "Predictive maintenance for multi-component systems of repairables with Remaining-Useful-Life prognostics and a limited stock of spare components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhihao Liu & Franco Davoli & Davide Borsatti, 2025. "Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT): Trends and Technologies," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-3, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leppinen, Jussi & Punkka, Antti & Ekholm, Tommi & Salo, Ahti, 2025. "An optimization model for determining cost-efficient maintenance policies for multi-component systems with economic and structural dependencies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    2. Guo, Yuanyuan & Sun, Youchao & Si, Qingmin & Guo, Xinyao & Chen, Nongtian, 2025. "Probabilistic risk assessment of civil aircraft associated failures under condition-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    3. Yang, Li & Zhou, Shihan & Ma, Xiaobing & Chen, Yi & Jia, Heping & Dai, Wei, 2024. "Group machinery intelligent maintenance: Adaptive health prediction and global dynamic maintenance decision-making," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    4. Abu MD Ariful Islam & Jørn Vatn, 2023. "Condition-based multi-component maintenance decision support under degradation uncertainties," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(4), pages 961-979, December.
    5. Mitici, Mihaela & de Pater, Ingeborg & Barros, Anne & Zeng, Zhiguo, 2023. "Dynamic predictive maintenance for multiple components using data-driven probabilistic RUL prognostics: The case of turbofan engines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Wu, Shaomin & Asadi, Majid, 2024. "A preventive maintenance policy and a method to approximate the failure process for multi-component systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(3), pages 825-835.
    7. Cai, Yue & de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud H., 2025. "Data-driven condition-based maintenance optimization given limited data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(1), pages 324-334.
    8. Wei, Xiaotong & Wang, Yalong & He, Yingdong & Liu, Zixian & He, Zhen, 2025. "Integrated production, maintenance and quality control for complex manufacturing systems considering imperfect maintenance and dynamic inspection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Azizi, Fariba & Salari, Nooshin, 2023. "A novel condition-based maintenance framework for parallel manufacturing systems based on bivariate birth/birth–death processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. Li, Meiyan & Wu, Bei, 2024. "Optimal condition-based opportunistic maintenance policy for two-component systems considering common cause failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    11. Kivanç, İpek & Fecarotti, Claudia & Raassens, Néomie & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2024. "A scalable multi-objective maintenance optimization model for systems with multiple heterogeneous components and a finite lifespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 567-579.
    12. Zhou, Kai-Li & Cheng, De-Jun & Zhang, Han-Bing & Hu, Zhong-tai & Zhang, Chun-Yan, 2023. "Deep learning-based intelligent multilevel predictive maintenance framework considering comprehensive cost," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    13. Jyrki Savolainen & Michele Urbani, 2021. "Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1953-1973, October.
    14. Kampitsis, Dimitris & Panagiotidou, Sofia, 2022. "A Bayesian condition-based maintenance and monitoring policy with variable sampling intervals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    15. Zheng, Rui & Wu, Kai & Lu, Shaojun & Li, Mengmeng, 2025. "Optimal condition-based replacement policy with unknown degradation parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PA).
    16. Mikhail, Mina & Ouali, Mohamed-Salah & Yacout, Soumaya, 2024. "A data-driven methodology with a nonparametric reliability method for optimal condition-based maintenance strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    17. Lu, Biao & Wang, Xin & Cui, Weiwei & Ye, Zhisheng, 2025. "A predictive opportunistic maintenance policy for a serial–parallel multi-station manufacturing system with heterogeneous components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Maintenance optimization in industry 4.0," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    19. He, Rui & Tian, Zhigang & Wang, Yifei & Zuo, Mingjian & Guo, Ziwei, 2023. "Condition-based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems considering prognostic information and degraded working efficiency," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    20. Zhang, Wenyu & Zhang, Xiaohong & He, Shuguang & Zhao, Xing & He, Zhen, 2024. "Optimal condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component repairable systems with economic dependence in a finite-horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:214-:d:1416561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.