IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v16y2024i3p97-d1356970.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detection of Forged Images Using a Combination of Passive Methods Based on Neural Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Ancilon Leuch Alencar

    (Master Program in Applied Computer Science (MCA), Escola Politécnica, University of Vale do Itajaí (UNIVALI), Campus Itajaí, Itajaí 88302-901, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Marcelo Dornbusch Lopes

    (Master Program in Applied Computer Science (MCA), Escola Politécnica, University of Vale do Itajaí (UNIVALI), Campus Itajaí, Itajaí 88302-901, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Anita Maria da Rocha Fernandes

    (Master Program in Applied Computer Science (MCA), Escola Politécnica, University of Vale do Itajaí (UNIVALI), Campus Itajaí, Itajaí 88302-901, Santa Catarina, Brazil)

  • Julio Cesar Santos dos Anjos

    (Graduate Program in Teleinformatics Engineering (PPGETI/UFC), Federal University of Ceará, Campus of Itapaje, Fortaleza 60455-970, Ceará, Brazil)

  • Juan Francisco De Paz Santana

    (Expert Systems and Applications Laboartory, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Industrial de Béjar, University of Salamanca, 37700 Salamanca, Spain)

  • Valderi Reis Quietinho Leithardt

    (Lisbon School of Engineering (ISEL), Polytechnic University of Lisbon (IPL), 1549-020 Lisbon, Portugal
    FIT-ISEL, 1959-007 Lisboa, Portugal
    Center of Technology and Systems (UNINOVA-CTS) and Associated Lab of Intelligent Systems (LASI), 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

Abstract

In the current era of social media, the proliferation of images sourced from unreliable origins underscores the pressing need for robust methods to detect forged content, particularly amidst the rapid evolution of image manipulation technologies. Existing literature delineates two primary approaches to image manipulation detection: active and passive. Active techniques intervene preemptively, embedding structures into images to facilitate subsequent authenticity verification, whereas passive methods analyze image content for traces of manipulation. This study presents a novel solution to image manipulation detection by leveraging a multi-stream neural network architecture. Our approach harnesses three convolutional neural networks (CNNs) operating on distinct data streams extracted from the original image. We have developed a solution based on two passive detection methodologies. The system utilizes two separate streams to extract specific data subsets, while a third stream processes the unaltered image. Each net independently processes its respective data stream, capturing diverse facets of the image. The outputs from these nets are then fused through concatenation to ascertain whether the image has undergone manipulation, yielding a comprehensive detection framework surpassing the efficacy of its constituent methods. Our work introduces a unique dataset derived from the fusion of four publicly available datasets, featuring organically manipulated images that closely resemble real-world scenarios. This dataset offers a more authentic representation than other state-of-the-art methods that use algorithmically generated datasets based on image patches. By encompassing genuine manipulation scenarios, our dataset enhances the model’s ability to generalize across varied manipulation techniques, thereby improving its performance in real-world settings. After training, the merged approach obtained an accuracy of 89.59% in the set of validation images, significantly higher than the model trained with only unaltered images, which obtained 78.64%, and the two other models trained using images with a feature selection method applied to enhance inconsistencies that obtained 68.02% for Error-Level Analysis images and 50.70% for the method using Discrete Wavelet Transform. Moreover, our proposed approach exhibits reduced accuracy variance compared to alternative models, underscoring its stability and robustness across diverse datasets. The approach outlined in this work needs to provide information about the specific location or type of tempering, which limits its practical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Ancilon Leuch Alencar & Marcelo Dornbusch Lopes & Anita Maria da Rocha Fernandes & Julio Cesar Santos dos Anjos & Juan Francisco De Paz Santana & Valderi Reis Quietinho Leithardt, 2024. "Detection of Forged Images Using a Combination of Passive Methods Based on Neural Networks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:97-:d:1356970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/3/97/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/3/97/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinzhu Lu & Lijuan Tan & Huanyu Jiang, 2021. "Review on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Applied to Plant Leaf Disease Classification," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Stefenon, Stefano Frizzo & Seman, Laio Oriel & Aquino, Luiza Scapinello & Coelho, Leandro dos Santos, 2023. "Wavelet-Seq2Seq-LSTM with attention for time series forecasting of level of dams in hydroelectric power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xia Hao & Man Zhang & Tianru Zhou & Xuchao Guo & Federico Tomasetto & Yuxin Tong & Minjuan Wang, 2021. "An Automatic Light Stress Grading Architecture Based on Feature Optimization and Convolutional Neural Network," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Mingfeng Huang & Guoqin Xu & Junyu Li & Jianping Huang, 2021. "A Method for Segmenting Disease Lesions of Maize Leaves in Real Time Using Attention YOLACT++," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Fahman Saeed & Muhammad Hussain & Hatim A. Aboalsamh, 2022. "Automatic Fingerprint Classification Using Deep Learning Technology (DeepFKTNet)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Gong, Ying & Wang, Yongzheng & Xie, Yuanhang & Peng, Xuzhang & Peng, Yan & Zhang, Wenhua, 2025. "Dynamic fusion LSTM-Transformer for prediction in energy harvesting from human motions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    5. Hieu T. T. L. Pham & Mahdi Rafieizonooz & SangUk Han & Dong-Eun Lee, 2021. "Current Status and Future Directions of Deep Learning Applications for Safety Management in Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-37, December.
    6. Sen Lin & Yucheng Xiu & Jianlei Kong & Chengcai Yang & Chunjiang Zhao, 2023. "An Effective Pyramid Neural Network Based on Graph-Related Attentions Structure for Fine-Grained Disease and Pest Identification in Intelligent Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Qu, Zhijian & Hou, Xinxing & Li, Jian & Hu, Wenbo, 2024. "Short-term wind farm cluster power prediction based on dual feature extraction and quadratic decomposition aggregation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    8. Shuntaro Aotake & Takuya Otani & Masatoshi Funabashi & Atsuo Takanishi, 2025. "Data-Efficient Sowing Position Estimation for Agricultural Robots Combining Image Analysis and Expert Knowledge," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Páez Mendieta, Jorge Daniel & Geriberto Hidalgo, Ieda & Cioffi, Francesco, 2024. "Impact of different hydrological models on hydroelectric operation planning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    10. Moreno, Sinvaldo Rodrigues & Seman, Laio Oriel & Stefenon, Stefano Frizzo & Coelho, Leandro dos Santos & Mariani, Viviana Cocco, 2024. "Enhancing wind speed forecasting through synergy of machine learning, singular spectral analysis, and variational mode decomposition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    11. Rafael Ninno Muniz & Carlos Tavares da Costa Júnior & William Gouvêa Buratto & Ademir Nied & Gabriel Villarrubia González, 2023. "The Sustainability Concept: A Review Focusing on Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Andrei M. Bramm & Pavel V. Matrenin & Alexandra I. Khalyasmaa, 2025. "A Review of XAI Methods Applications in Forecasting Runoff and Water Level Hydrological Tasks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Yifan Jiang & Jin Shang & Yueyue Cai & Shiyang Liu & Ziqin Liao & Jie Pang & Yong He & Xuan Wei, 2025. "The Fusion of Focused Spectral and Image Texture Features: A New Exploration of the Nondestructive Detection of Degeneration Degree in Pleurotus geesteranus," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Jianlei Kong & Yang Xiao & Xuebo Jin & Yuanyuan Cai & Chao Ding & Yuting Bai, 2023. "LCA-Net: A Lightweight Cross-Stage Aggregated Neural Network for Fine-Grained Recognition of Crop Pests and Diseases," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Xiong, Xin & Zhu, Zhenghao & Tian, Junhao & Guo, Huan & Hu, Xi, 2024. "A novel Seasonal Fractional Incomplete Gamma Grey Bernoulli Model and its application in forecasting hydroelectric generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    16. Jinzhu Lu & Kaiqian Peng & Qi Wang & Cong Sun, 2023. "Lettuce Plant Trace-Element-Deficiency Symptom Identification via Machine Vision Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-27, August.
    17. Mosleh Hmoud Al-Adhaileh & Amit Verma & Theyazn H. H. Aldhyani & Deepika Koundal, 2023. "Potato Blight Detection Using Fine-Tuned CNN Architecture," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Yunsong Jia & Qingxin Zhao & Yi Xiong & Xin Chen & Xiang Li, 2024. "Crop Guidance Photography Algorithm for Mobile Terminals," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Xiang Zhang & Huiyi Gao & Li Wan, 2022. "Classification of Fine-Grained Crop Disease by Dilated Convolution and Improved Channel Attention Module," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Zhi-Ben Yin & Fu-Yong Liu & Hui Geng & Ya-Jun Xi & De-Bin Zeng & Chun-Jing Si & Ming-Deng Shi, 2024. "A high-precision jujube disease spot detection based on SSD during the sorting process," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-28, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:97-:d:1356970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.