IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v11y2019i3p79-d216815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Topic-Specific Emotion Mining Model for Online Comments

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangfeng Luo

    (Shanghai Institute for Advanced Communication and Data Science, School of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Yawen Yi

    (School of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

Nowadays, massive texts are generated on the web, which contain a variety of viewpoints, attitudes, and emotions for products and services. Subjective information mining of online comments is vital for enterprises to improve their products or services and for consumers to make purchase decisions. Various effective methods, the mainstream one of which is the topic model, have been put forward to solve this problem. Although most of topic models can mine the topic-level emotion of the product comments, they do not consider interword relations and the number of topics determined adaptively, which leads to poor comprehensibility, high time requirement, and low accuracy. To solve the above problems, this paper proposes an unsupervised Topic-Specific Emotion Mining Model (TSEM), which adds corresponding relationship between aspect words and opinion words to express comments as a bag of aspect–opinion pairs. On one hand, the rich semantic information obtained by adding interword relationship can enhance the comprehensibility of results. On the other hand, text dimensions reduced by adding relationships can cut the computation time. In addition, the number of topics in our model is adaptively determined by calculating perplexity to improve the emotion accuracy of the topic level. Our experiments using Taobao commodity comments achieve better results than baseline models in terms of accuracy, computation time, and comprehensibility. Therefore, our proposed model can be effectively applied to online comment emotion mining tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangfeng Luo & Yawen Yi, 2019. "Topic-Specific Emotion Mining Model for Online Comments," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:79-:d:216815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/11/3/79/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/11/3/79/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Al Smadi & Islam Obaidat & Mahmoud Al-Ayyoub & Rami Mohawesh & Yaser Jararweh, 2016. "Using Enhanced Lexicon-Based Approaches for the Determination of Aspect Categories and Their Polarities in Arabic Reviews," International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering (IJITWE), IGI Global, vol. 11(3), pages 15-31, July.
    2. Hui Zhang & Huguang Rao & Junzheng Feng, 2018. "Product innovation based on online review data mining: a case study of Huawei phones," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 3-22, March.
    3. Prabowo, Rudy & Thelwall, Mike, 2009. "Sentiment analysis: A combined approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 143-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuyue Huang & Lena Jingen Liang & Hwansuk Chris Choi, 2022. "How We Failed in Context: A Text-Mining Approach to Understanding Hotel Service Failures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Yuanyuan Guo & Yanqing Wang & Chaoyou Wang, 2019. "Exploring the Salient Attributes of Short-Term Rental Experience: An Analysis of Online Reviews from Chinese Guests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Damiano De Marchi & Rudy Becarelli & Leonardo Di Sarli, 2022. "Tourism Sustainability Index: Measuring Tourism Sustainability Based on the ETIS Toolkit, by Exploring Tourist Satisfaction via Sentiment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Hui Yuan & Wei Xu & Qian Li & Raymond Lau, 2018. "Topic sentiment mining for sales performance prediction in e-commerce," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 553-576, November.
    5. Yong Shi & Luyao Zhu & Wei Li & Kun Guo & Yuanchun Zheng, 2019. "Survey on Classic and Latest Textual Sentiment Analysis Articles and Techniques," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1243-1287, July.
    6. Satish Kumar & Weng Marc Lim & Nitesh Pandey & J. Christopher Westland, 2021. "20 years of Electronic Commerce Research," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-40, March.
    7. Mustak, Mekhail & Salminen, Joni & Plé, Loïc & Wirtz, Jochen, 2021. "Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 389-404.
    8. Jianping Li & Yinhong Yao & Yuanjie Xu & Jingyu Li & Lu Wei & Xiaoqian Zhu, 2019. "Consumer’s risk perception on the Belt and Road countries: evidence from the cross-border e-commerce," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 823-840, December.
    9. Yucel, Ahmet & Dag, Ali & Oztekin, Asil & Carpenter, Mark, 2022. "A novel text analytic methodology for classification of product and service reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 287-297.
    10. Kyungbo Park & Jeonghwa Cha & Jongyi Hong, 2023. "Developing a Framework for Evaluating and Predicting Management Innovation in Public Research Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Xiaoguang Wang & Tao Lv & Lei Fan, 2022. "New Energy Vehicle Consumer Demand Mining Research Based on Fusion Topic Model: A Case in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    12. Yanlai Li & Zifan Shen & Cuiming Zhao & Kwai-Sang Chin & Xuwei Lang, 2024. "Understanding Customer Opinion Change on Fresh Food E-Commerce Products and Services—Comparative Analysis before and during COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Shivendra Kumar & C. Ravindranath Chowdary, 2022. "Semantic model to extract tips from hotel reviews," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1059-1077, December.
    14. Dan Ke & Heci Zhang & Ning Yu & Yanbin Tu, 2021. "Who will stay with the brand after posting non-5/5 rating of purchase? An empirical study of online consumer repurchase behavior," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 405-437, June.
    15. F. Schweitzer & D. Garcia, 2010. "An agent-based model of collective emotions in online communities," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 77(4), pages 533-545, October.
    16. Tidor-Vlad Pricope, 2021. "Deep Reinforcement Learning in Quantitative Algorithmic Trading: A Review," Papers 2106.00123, arXiv.org.
    17. Huang, Shupeng & Potter, Andrew & Eyers, Daniel & Li, Qinyun, 2021. "The influence of online review adoption on the profitability of capacitated supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    18. Yaxin Bi, 2022. "Sentiment classification in social media data by combining triplet belief functions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(7), pages 968-991, July.
    19. Lima, Ana Carolina E.S. & de Castro, Leandro Nunes & Corchado, Juan M., 2015. "A polarity analysis framework for Twitter messages," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 270(C), pages 756-767.
    20. Gang Wang & Daqing Zheng & Shanlin Yang & Jian Ma, 2018. "FCE-SVM: a new cluster based ensemble method for opinion mining from social media," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 721-742, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:79-:d:216815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.