IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v6y2013i5p2562-2582d25828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of the Operational Noise from Full Scale Wave Energy Converters in the Lysekil Project: Estimation of Potential Environmental Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Kalle Haikonen

    (Division of Electricity, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 534, Uppsala 751 25, Sweden)

  • Jan Sundberg

    (Division of Electricity, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 534, Uppsala 751 25, Sweden)

  • Mats Leijon

    (Division of Electricity, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 534, Uppsala 751 25, Sweden)

Abstract

Wave energy conversion is a clean electric power production technology. During operation there are no emissions in the form of harmful gases. However there are unsolved issues considering environmental impacts such as: electromagnetism; the artificial reef effect and underwater noise. Anthropogenic noise is increasing in the oceans worldwide and wave power will contribute to this sound pollution in the oceans; but to what extent? The main purpose of this study was to examine the noise emitted by a full scale operating Wave Energy Converter (WEC) in the Lysekil project at Uppsala University in Sweden. A minor review of the hearing capabilities of fish and marine mammals is presented to aid in the conclusions of impact from anthropogenic sound. A hydrophone was deployed to the seabed in the Lysekil research site park at distance of 20 and 40 m away from two operational WECs. The measurements were performed in the spring of 2011. The results showed that the main noise was a transient noise with most of its energy in frequencies below 1 kHz. These results indicate that several marine organisms (fish and mammals) will be able to hear the operating WECs of a distance of at least 20 m.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalle Haikonen & Jan Sundberg & Mats Leijon, 2013. "Characteristics of the Operational Noise from Full Scale Wave Energy Converters in the Lysekil Project: Estimation of Potential Environmental Impacts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:5:p:2562-2582:d:25828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/5/2562/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/6/5/2562/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Waters, Rafael & Engström, Jens & Isberg, Jan & Leijon, Mats, 2009. "Wave climate off the Swedish west coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1600-1606.
    2. Kofoed, Jens Peter & Frigaard, Peter & Friis-Madsen, Erik & Sørensen, Hans Chr., 2006. "Prototype testing of the wave energy converter wave dragon," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 181-189.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Walsh, Jodi & Bashir, Imran & Garrett, Joanne K. & Thies, Philipp R. & Blondel, Philippe & Johanning, Lars, 2017. "Monitoring the condition of Marine Renewable Energy Devices through underwater Acoustic Emissions: Case study of a Wave Energy Converter in Falmouth Bay, UK," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PA), pages 205-213.
    2. Zhang, Yongxing & Zhao, Yongjie & Sun, Wei & Li, Jiaxuan, 2021. "Ocean wave energy converters: Technical principle, device realization, and performance evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Jennifer Leijon & Jonathan Sjölund & Boel Ekergård & Cecilia Boström & Sandra Eriksson & Irina Temiz & Mats Leijon, 2017. "Study of an Altered Magnetic Circuit of a Permanent Magnet Linear Generator for Wave Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Galparsoro, I. & Korta, M. & Subirana, I. & Borja, Á. & Menchaca, I. & Solaun, O. & Muxika, I. & Iglesias, G. & Bald, J., 2021. "A new framework and tool for ecological risk assessment of wave energy converters projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Choupin, Ophelie & Del Río-Gamero, B. & Schallenberg-Rodríguez, Julieta & Yánez-Rosales, Pablo, 2022. "Integration of assessment-methods for wave renewable energy: Resource and installation feasibility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 455-482.
    6. Hammar, Linus & Gullström, Martin & Dahlgren, Thomas G. & Asplund, Maria E. & Goncalves, Ines Braga & Molander, Sverker, 2017. "Introducing ocean energy industries to a busy marine environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 178-185.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dina Silva & Eugen Rusu & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2013. "Evaluation of Various Technologies for Wave Energy Conversion in the Portuguese Nearshore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Valentina Vannucchi & Lorenzo Cappietti, 2016. "Wave Energy Assessment and Performance Estimation of State of the Art Wave Energy Converters in Italian Hotspots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Eugen Rusu, 2014. "Evaluation of the Wave Energy Conversion Efficiency in Various Coastal Environments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Tănase Zanopol, Andrei & Onea, Florin & Rusu, Eugen, 2014. "Coastal impact assessment of a generic wave farm operating in the Romanian nearshore," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 652-670.
    5. Arinaga, Randi A. & Cheung, Kwok Fai, 2012. "Atlas of global wave energy from 10 years of reanalysis and hindcast data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 49-64.
    6. Xu, Sheng & Wang, Shan & Guedes Soares, C., 2019. "Review of mooring design for floating wave energy converters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 595-621.
    7. Buccino, Mariano & Stagonas, Dimitris & Vicinanza, Diego, 2015. "Development of a composite sea wall wave energy converter system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 509-522.
    8. Kovaleva, Olga & Eelsalu, Maris & Soomere, Tarmo, 2017. "Hot-spots of large wave energy resources in relatively sheltered sections of the Baltic Sea coast," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 424-437.
    9. Mustapa, M.A. & Yaakob, O.B. & Ahmed, Yasser M. & Rheem, Chang-Kyu & Koh, K.K. & Adnan, Faizul Amri, 2017. "Wave energy device and breakwater integration: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 43-58.
    10. Morim, Joao & Cartwright, Nick & Etemad-Shahidi, Amir & Strauss, Darrell & Hemer, Mark, 2016. "Wave energy resource assessment along the Southeast coast of Australia on the basis of a 31-year hindcast," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 276-297.
    11. Rusu, Eugen & Guedes Soares, C., 2012. "Wave energy pattern around the Madeira Islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 771-785.
    12. Iglesias, G. & Carballo, R., 2014. "Wave farm impact: The role of farm-to-coast distance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 375-385.
    13. David Gallach-Sánchez & Peter Troch & Andreas Kortenhaus, 2018. "A Critical Analysis and Validation of the Accuracy of Wave Overtopping Prediction Formulae for OWECs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Brenda Rojas-Delgado & Monica Alonso & Hortensia Amaris & Juan de Santiago, 2019. "Wave Power Output Smoothing through the Use of a High-Speed Kinetic Buffer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    15. Hazlett, Ben D. & Inculet, Ion I. & Inculet, Diana R., 2009. "Electric power generation by ‘Surfing’ water waves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2510-2514.
    16. Soomere, Tarmo & Eelsalu, Maris, 2014. "On the wave energy potential along the eastern Baltic Sea coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 221-233.
    17. Venugopalan Kurupath & Rickard Ekström & Mats Leijon, 2013. "Optimal Constant DC Link Voltage Operation of a Wave Energy Converter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, April.
    18. Rusu, Liliana & Guedes Soares, C., 2012. "Wave energy assessments in the Azores islands," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 183-196.
    19. James Allen & Konstantinos Sampanis & Jian Wan & Deborah Greaves & Jon Miles & Gregorio Iglesias, 2016. "Laboratory Tests in the Development of WaveCat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Pasquale Contestabile & Enrico Di Lauro & Paolo Galli & Cesare Corselli & Diego Vicinanza, 2017. "Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Assessment around Malè and Magoodhoo Island (Maldives)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:6:y:2013:i:5:p:2562-2582:d:25828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.