IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i7p1701-d1622873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sulfur Emission Dependence on Various Factors During Biomass Combustion

Author

Listed:
  • Giedrius Jomantas

    (Department of Energy, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Design, Kaunas University of Technology, 51424 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Kęstutis Buinevičius

    (Department of Energy, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Design, Kaunas University of Technology, 51424 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Justas Šereika

    (Laboratory of Heat Equipment Research and Testing, Lithuania Energy Institute, 44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

The transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources often requires shifting toward biomass fuels such as agriculture residues and waste, which tend to emit higher emission rates during combustion, and one of them is sulfur compounds. The main objective of this study is to clarify the regularities of the formation of sulfur compounds depending on the technological factors when burning sulfur-containing biomass. The experiments were conducted on two experimental stands—models of 20 kW and 25 kW capacities of industrial boilers equipped with reciprocating grates—by burning sunflower husk pellets and meat bone meal. The influence of incomplete combustion (indicator CO concentration), flue gas recirculation, and combined effects of both factors on concentrations of SO 2 , SO 3 , and H 2 S were investigated during experiments. In addition, 20–90% of the sulfur in the fuel is converted to SO 2 , contingent upon the combustion conditions. These findings have practical implications for the design and operation of biomass combustion systems. The highest SO 2 emissions were observed when primary air was mixed with flue gas recirculation and at the highest content of CO. The correlation of SO 2 and SO 3 and SO 2 and H 2 S concentrations in flue gases of boilers was investigated. The conversion ratio of SO 2 to SO 3 was determined under different combustion modes and showed that this ratio can reach up to 5%. The sulfur content in ash deposits in different areas of the actual industrial boiler was analyzed. The highest percent of sulfur (S = 20%) in ash was found on the first boiler pass.

Suggested Citation

  • Giedrius Jomantas & Kęstutis Buinevičius & Justas Šereika, 2025. "Sulfur Emission Dependence on Various Factors During Biomass Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1701-:d:1622873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1701/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1701/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang, Xiaorui & Wang, Qinhui & Luo, Zhongyang & Eddings, Eric & Ring, Terry & Li, Simin & Lin, Junjie & Xue, Shuang & Han, Long & Xie, Guilin, 2019. "Experimental and numerical investigation on sulfur transformation in pressurized oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Sher, Farooq & Pans, Miguel A. & Afilaka, Daniel T. & Sun, Chenggong & Liu, Hao, 2017. "Experimental investigation of woody and non-woody biomass combustion in a bubbling fluidised bed combustor focusing on gaseous emissions and temperature profiles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2069-2080.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dai, Gaofeng & Zhang, Jiaye & Wang, Xuebin & Tan, Houzhang & Rahman, Zia ur, 2022. "Calcination and desulfurization characteristics of calcium carbonate in pressurized oxy-combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    2. Heng Wang & Zhaoping Zhong, 2019. "A Mixing Behavior Study of Biomass Particles and Sands in Fluidized Bed Based on CFD-DEM Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Sher, Farooq & Yaqoob, Aqsa & Saeed, Farrukh & Zhang, Shengfu & Jahan, Zaib & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2020. "Torrefied biomass fuels as a renewable alternative to coal in co-firing for power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Monika Słupska & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Roman Stopa, 2019. "Determination of Strength Properties of Energy Plants on the Example of Miscanthus × Giganteus , Rosa Multiflora and Salix Viminalis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Huan Li & Huawei Mou & Nan Zhao & Yaohong Yu & Quan Hong & Mperejekumana Philbert & Yuguang Zhou & Hossein Beidaghy Dizaji & Renjie Dong, 2021. "Nitrogen Migration during Pyrolysis of Raw and Acid Leached Maize Straw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Hu, Yulin & Gong, Mengyue & Xing, Xuelian & Wang, Haoyu & Zeng, Yimin & Xu, Chunbao Charles, 2020. "Supercritical water gasification of biomass model compounds: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Julio Barzola-Monteses & Mónica Mite-León & Mayken Espinoza-Andaluz & Juan Gómez-Romero & Waldo Fajardo, 2019. "Time Series Analysis for Predicting Hydroelectric Power Production: The Ecuador Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Lizheng Zhao & Yanfei Du & Yusen Zeng & Zhizhong Kang & Baomin Sun, 2020. "Sulfur Conversion of Mixed Coal and Gangue during Combustion in a CFB Boiler," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Wang, Jinkai & Feng, Xiaoyong & Wanyan, Qiqi & Zhao, Kai & Wang, Ziji & Pei, Gen & Xie, Jun & Tian, Bo, 2022. "Hysteresis effect of three-phase fluids in the high-intensity injection–production process of sandstone underground gas storages," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. Saaida Khlifi & Marzouk Lajili & Patrick Perré & Victor Pozzobon, 2022. "A Numerical Study of Turbulent Combustion of a Lignocellulosic Gas Mixture in an Updraft Fixed Bed Reactor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Sher, Farooq & Smječanin, Narcisa & Khan, Muhammad Kashif & Shabbir, Imran & Ali, Salman & Hatshan, Mohammad Rafe & Ul Hai, Irfan, 2024. "Agglomeration behaviour of various biomass fuels under different air staging conditions in fluidised bed technology for renewable energy applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    12. Fumi Harahap & Sylvain Leduc & Sennai Mesfun & Dilip Khatiwada & Florian Kraxner & Semida Silveira, 2019. "Opportunities to Optimize the Palm Oil Supply Chain in Sumatra, Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Paul Thomas & Nirmala Soren, 2020. "An overview of municipal solid waste-to-energy application in Indian scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 575-592, February.
    14. Ling, Jester Lih Jie & Yang, Won & Park, Han Saem & Lee, Ha Eun & Lee, See Hoon, 2023. "A comparative review on advanced biomass oxygen fuel combustion technologies for carbon capture and storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    15. Haruthai Chenboonthai & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2019. "Cooperation Intensity for Effective Policy Development and Implementation: A Case Study of Thailand’s Alternative Energy Development Plan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Zeng, Guang & Xu, Mingchen & Tu, Yaojie & Li, Zhenwei & Cai, Yongtie & Zheng, Zhimin & Tay, Kunlin & Yang, Wenming, 2020. "Influences of initial coal concentration on ignition behaviors of low-NOx bias combustion technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    17. Zhang, Qiyan & Liu, Yanxing & Cao, Yuhao & Li, Zhengyuan & Hou, Jiachen & Gou, Xiang, 2023. "Parametric study and optimization of MEA-based carbon capture for a coal and biomass co-firing power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 838-850.
    18. Petr Procházka & Luboš Smutka & Vladimír Hönig, 2019. "Using Biofuels for Highly Renewable Electricity Systems: A Case Study of the Jatropha curcas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Zhao, Jingyu & Zhang, Yongli & Song, Jiajia & Guo, Tao & Deng, Jun & Shu, Chi-Min, 2023. "Oxygen distribution and gaseous products change of coal fire based upon the semi-enclosed experimental system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    20. Awais, Muhammad & Omar, Muhammad Mubashar & Munir, Anjum & li, Wei & Ajmal, Muhammad & Hussain, Sajjad & Ahmad, Syed Amjad & Ali, Amjad, 2022. "Co-gasification of different biomass feedstock in a pilot-scale (24 kWe) downdraft gasifier: An experimental approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1701-:d:1622873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.