IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i14p3778-d1703259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on an Algorithm of Power System Node Importance Assessment Based on Topology–Parameter Co-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Guowei Sun

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Xianming Sun

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Junqi Geng

    (State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company Zibo Power Supply Company, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Guangyang Han

    (School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

Abstract

As power grids continue to expand in scale, the occurrence of cascading failures within them can lead to significant economic losses. Therefore, assessing the criticality of grid nodes is crucial for ensuring the secure and stable operation of power systems and for mitigating losses when cascading failures occur. The classical Local Link Similarity (LLS) algorithm in complex networks evaluates the importance of network nodes from a neighborhood topology perspective, but it suffers from issues such as the excessive weighting of node degrees and the neglect of electrical parameters. Based on the classical algorithm, this paper first develops the Improved Local Link Similarity (ILLS) algorithm by substituting alternative similarity metrics and comparatively evaluating their performance. Building upon the ILLS, we then propose the Electrical LLS (ELLS) algorithm by integrating node power flow and electrical coupling connectivity as multiplicative factors, with optimal combinations determined via simulation experiments. Compared to classical approaches, ELLS demonstrates superior adaptability to power grid contexts and delivers enhanced accuracy in power system node importance assessments. These algorithms are applied to rank the node importance in the IEEE 300-bus system. Their performance is evaluated using the loss-of-load-size metric, comparing ELLS, ILLS, and the classical algorithm. The results demonstrate that under the loss-of-load-size metric, the ELLS algorithm achieves approximately 25% higher accuracy compared to both the ILLS and the classical algorithm, validating its effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Guowei Sun & Xianming Sun & Junqi Geng & Guangyang Han, 2025. "Research on an Algorithm of Power System Node Importance Assessment Based on Topology–Parameter Co-Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3778-:d:1703259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3778/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3778/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3778-:d:1703259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.