IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i14p3736-d1701808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing Energy-Efficient Renovation Through Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment and Costing: Insights and Experiences from VERIFY Tool Deployment

Author

Listed:
  • Komninos Angelakoglou

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Thermi, GR-57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Ioannis Lampropoulos

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Thermi, GR-57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Eleni Chatzigeorgiou

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Thermi, GR-57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Paraskevi Giourka

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Thermi, GR-57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Georgios Martinopoulos

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Thermi, GR-57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
    Merchant Marine Academy of Macedonia, Néa Michanióna, GR-57004 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Angelos-Saverios Skembris

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Thermi, GR-57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Andreas Seitaridis

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Thermi, GR-57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Georgia Kousovista

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Thermi, GR-57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Nikos Nikolopoulos

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute (CPERI), Thermi, GR-57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

This study investigates the deployment of VERIFY, a dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) tool, tailored to evaluate the energy and environmental performance of building renovation strategies. The tool was applied to three diverse building renovation projects across Europe, offering insights into how life cycle-based tools can enhance decision-making by integrating operational data and modeling of energy systems. The paper highlights how VERIFY captures both embodied and operational impacts—addressing limitations of conventional energy assessments—and aligns with EU frameworks such as Level(s). Key findings from the case studies in Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands demonstrate how LCA/LCC-based approaches can support energy efficiency objectives and guide sustainability-aligned renovation investments. Across the three case studies, the tool demonstrated up to 51% reduction in primary energy demand, 66% decrease in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, and 51% reduction in life cycle costs. These outcomes provide researchers with a validated dynamic LCA/LCC framework and offer practitioners a replicable methodology for planning and evaluating sustainability-driven renovations. Despite their advantages, the effective use of LCA tools in energy renovation faces challenges, including limited data availability, regulatory fragmentation, and methodological complexity. The paper concludes that advanced tools such as VERIFY, when harmonized with evolving EU energy performance and sustainability standards, can strengthen the evidence base for deep energy renovation and carbon reduction in the building sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Komninos Angelakoglou & Ioannis Lampropoulos & Eleni Chatzigeorgiou & Paraskevi Giourka & Georgios Martinopoulos & Angelos-Saverios Skembris & Andreas Seitaridis & Georgia Kousovista & Nikos Nikolopou, 2025. "Advancing Energy-Efficient Renovation Through Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment and Costing: Insights and Experiences from VERIFY Tool Deployment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-25, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3736-:d:1701808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3736/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/14/3736/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beccali, Marco & Cellura, Maurizio & Fontana, Mario & Longo, Sonia & Mistretta, Marina, 2013. "Energy retrofit of a single-family house: Life cycle net energy saving and environmental benefits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 283-293.
    2. Slavkovic, Katarina & Stephan, André, 2025. "Dynamic life cycle assessment of buildings and building stocks – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. Nikolaos Ziozas & Angeliki Kitsopoulou & Evangelos Bellos & Petros Iliadis & Dimitra Gonidaki & Komninos Angelakoglou & Nikolaos Nikolopoulos & Silvia Ricciuti & Diego Viesi, 2024. "Energy Performance Analysis of the Renovation Process in an Italian Cultural Heritage Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piccardo, C. & Dodoo, A. & Gustavsson, L. & Tettey, U.Y.A., 2020. "Retrofitting with different building materials: Life-cycle primary energy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. De Boeck, L. & Verbeke, S. & Audenaert, A. & De Mesmaeker, L., 2015. "Improving the energy performance of residential buildings: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 960-975.
    3. Fahlstedt, Oskar & Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka & Lohne, Jardar & Bohne, Rolf André, 2022. "Holistic assessment of carbon abatement strategies in building refurbishment literature — A scoping review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Cellura, Maurizio & Guarino, Francesco & Longo, Sonia & Mistretta, Marina, 2017. "Modeling the energy and environmental life cycle of buildings: A co-simulation approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 733-742.
    5. Michele La Noce & Alessandro Lo Faro & Gaetano Sciuto, 2021. "Clay-Based Products Sustainable Development: Some Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Benjamin Sanchez & Mansour Esnaashary Esfahani & Carl Haas, 2019. "A methodology to analyze the net environmental impacts and building’s cost performance of an adaptive reuse project: a case study of the Waterloo County Courthouse renovations," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 419-438, December.
    7. Linlin Zhao & Zhansheng Liu & Jasper Mbachu, 2019. "Energy Management through Cost Forecasting for Residential Buildings in New Zealand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & María-José Bastante-Ceca & José-María Piñero-Vilela, 2021. "Economic and Environmental Assessment on Implementing Solar Renewable Energy Systems in Spanish Residential Homes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-39, July.
    9. Janne Hirvonen & Juha Jokisalo & Juhani Heljo & Risto Kosonen, 2019. "Towards the EU Emission Targets of 2050: Cost-Effective Emission Reduction in Finnish Detached Houses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
    10. Venkatraj, V. & Dixit, M.K., 2021. "Life cycle embodied energy analysis of higher education buildings: A comparison between different LCI methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    11. Elena G. Dascalaki & Poulia A. Argiropoulou & Constantinos A. Balaras & Kalliopi G. Droutsa & Simon Kontoyiannidis, 2020. "Benchmarks for Embodied and Operational Energy Assessment of Hellenic Single-Family Houses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-36, August.
    12. Miguel Martínez Comesaña & Sandra Martínez Mariño & Pablo Eguía Oller & Enrique Granada Álvarez & Aitor Erkoreka González, 2020. "A Functional Data Analysis for Assessing the Impact of a Retrofitting in the Energy Performance of a Building," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Sierra-Pérez, Jorge & Rodríguez-Soria, Beatriz & Boschmonart-Rives, Jesús & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2018. "Integrated life cycle assessment and thermodynamic simulation of a public building’s envelope renovation: Conventional vs. Passivhaus proposal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1510-1521.
    14. Maria Anna Cusenza & Teresa Maria Gulotta & Marina Mistretta & Maurizio Cellura, 2021. "Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Assessment of the Thermal Insulation Improvement in Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Shadram, Farshid & Bhattacharjee, Shimantika & Lidelöw, Sofia & Mukkavaara, Jani & Olofsson, Thomas, 2020. "Exploring the trade-off in life cycle energy of building retrofit through optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    16. Xu, Xin & You, Shijun & Zheng, Xuejing & Li, Han, 2014. "A survey of district heating systems in the heating regions of northern China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 909-925.
    17. Martínez, E. & Latorre-Biel, J.I. & Jiménez, E. & Sanz, F. & Blanco, J., 2018. "Life cycle assessment of a wind farm repowering process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 260-271.
    18. Nematchoua, Modeste Kameni & Marie-Reine Nishimwe, Antoinette & Reiter, Sigrid, 2021. "Towards nearly zero-energy residential neighbourhoods in the European Union: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    19. Cellura, Maurizio & Guarino, Francesco & Longo, Sonia & Mistretta, Marina, 2015. "Different energy balances for the redesign of nearly net zero energy buildings: An Italian case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 100-112.
    20. Xiaomei Yan & Shenghui Cui & Lilai Xu & Jianyi Lin & Ghaffar Ali, 2018. "Carbon Footprints of Urban Residential Buildings: A Household Survey-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:14:p:3736-:d:1701808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.