IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i13p3523-d1694239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart Grid System Based on Blockchain Technology for Enhancing Trust and Preventing Counterfeiting Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Ala’a Shamaseen

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Mohammad Qatawneh

    (Department of Networks and Cybersecurity, Faculty of Information Technology, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Al-Saro 19328, Jordan)

  • Basima Elshqeirat

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

Abstract

Traditional systems in real life lack transparency and ease of use due to their reliance on centralization and large infrastructure. Furthermore, many sectors that rely on information technology face major challenges related to data integrity, trust, and counterfeiting, limiting scalability and acceptance in the community. With the decentralization and digitization of energy transactions in smart grids, security, integrity, and fraud prevention concerns have increased. The main problem addressed in this study is the lack of a secure, tamper-resistant, and decentralized mechanism to facilitate direct consumer-to-prosumer energy transactions. Thus, this is a major challenge in the smart grid. In the blockchain, current consensus algorithms may limit the scalability of smart grids, especially when depending on popular algorithms such as Proof of Work, due to their high energy consumption, which is incompatible with the characteristics of the smart grid. Meanwhile, Proof of Stake algorithms rely on energy or cryptocurrency stake ownership, which may make the smart grid environment in blockchain technology vulnerable to control by the many owning nodes, which is incompatible with the purpose and objective of this study. This study addresses these issues by proposing and implementing a hybrid framework that combines the features of private and public blockchains across three integrated layers: user interface, application, and blockchain. A key contribution of the system is the design of a novel consensus algorithm, Proof of Energy, which selects validators based on node roles and randomized assignment, rather than computational power or stake ownership. This makes it more suitable for smart grid environments. The entire framework was developed without relying on existing decentralized platforms such as Ethereum. The system was evaluated through comprehensive experiments on performance and security. Performance results show a throughput of up to 60.86 transactions per second and an average latency of 3.40 s under a load of 10,000 transactions. Security validation confirmed resistance against digital signature forgery, invalid smart contracts, race conditions, and double-spending attacks. Despite the promising performance, several limitations remain. The current system was developed and tested on a single machine as a simulation-based study using transaction logs without integration of real smart meters or actual energy tokenization in real-time scenarios. In future work, we will focus on integrating real-time smart meters and implementing full energy tokenization to achieve a complete and autonomous smart grid platform. Overall, the proposed system significantly enhances data integrity, trust, and resistance to counterfeiting in smart grids.

Suggested Citation

  • Ala’a Shamaseen & Mohammad Qatawneh & Basima Elshqeirat, 2025. "Smart Grid System Based on Blockchain Technology for Enhancing Trust and Preventing Counterfeiting Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3523-:d:1694239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3523/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3523/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daisy Nkele Molokomme & Chabalala S. Chabalala & Pitshou N. Bokoro, 2020. "A Review of Cognitive Radio Smart Grid Communication Infrastructure Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Muhammad Waseem & Muhammad Adnan Khan & Arman Goudarzi & Shah Fahad & Intisar Ali Sajjad & Pierluigi Siano, 2023. "Incorporation of Blockchain Technology for Different Smart Grid Applications: Architecture, Prospects, and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Abram, Simone & Geach, Dale & Jenkins, David & McCallum, Peter & Peacock, Andrew, 2019. "Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-174.
    4. Dileep, G., 2020. "A survey on smart grid technologies and applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2589-2625.
    5. Hamzah Khan & Tariq Masood, 2022. "Impact of Blockchain Technology on Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Georgios Lampropoulos, 2024. "Blockchain in Smart Grids: A Bibliometric Analysis and Scientific Mapping Study," J, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-29, January.
    7. Ayusee Swain & Surender Reddy Salkuti & Kaliprasanna Swain, 2021. "An Optimized and Decentralized Energy Provision System for Smart Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Nikolay Rogalev & Andrey Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Olga Zlyvko & Sergey Osipov, 2023. "An Overview of Small Nuclear Power Plants for Clean Energy Production: Comparative Analysis of Distributed Generation Technologies and Future Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Sousa-Dias & Daniel Amyot & Ashkan Rahimi-Kian & John Mylopoulos, 2023. "A Review of Cybersecurity Concerns for Transactive Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-32, June.
    2. Vinoth Kumar Ponnusamy & Padmanathan Kasinathan & Rajvikram Madurai Elavarasan & Vinoth Ramanathan & Ranjith Kumar Anandan & Umashankar Subramaniam & Aritra Ghosh & Eklas Hossain, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review on Sustainable Aspects of Big Data Analytics for the Smart Grid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-35, December.
    3. Vidya Krishnan Mololoth & Saguna Saguna & Christer Åhlund, 2023. "Blockchain and Machine Learning for Future Smart Grids: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-39, January.
    4. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Michael J. Fell & Alexandra Schneiders & David Shipworth, 2019. "Consumer Demand for Blockchain-Enabled Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading in the United Kingdom: An Online Survey Experiment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Boyu Liu & Xiameng Si & Haiyan Kang, 2022. "A Literature Review of Blockchain-Based Applications in Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Matteo Vaccargiu & Andrea Pinna & Roberto Tonelli & Luisanna Cocco, 2023. "Blockchain in the Energy Sector for SDG Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    8. Zhou, Yuekuan & Lund, Peter D., 2023. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities ─ trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 177-193.
    9. Guelpa, Elisa & Bischi, Aldo & Verda, Vittorio & Chertkov, Michael & Lund, Henrik, 2019. "Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 2-21.
    10. Schinckus, Christophe, 2022. "A Nuanced perspective on blockchain technology and healthcare," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    11. A. J. Jin & C. Li & J. Su & J. Tan, 2022. "Fundamental Studies of Smart Distributed Energy Resources along with Energy Blockchain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-12, October.
    12. Panagiota Xanthopoulou, 2022. "Blockchain and the digital transformation of the public sector: The Greek experience," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 32(1), pages 558-570, June.
    13. Mahmoona Khalil & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Muddassar Sarfraz, 2022. "The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial sector during the era of fourth industrial revolution: a moderated mediated model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2435-2452, August.
    14. Felix Garcia-Torres & Ascension Zafra-Cabeza & Carlos Silva & Stephane Grieu & Tejaswinee Darure & Ana Estanqueiro, 2021. "Model Predictive Control for Microgrid Functionalities: Review and Future Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, February.
    15. Chisom E. Ogbogu & Jesse Thornburg & Samuel O. Okozi, 2025. "Smart Grid Fault Mitigation and Cybersecurity with Wide-Area Measurement Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Hafize Nurgul Durmus Senyapar & Ramazan Bayindir, 2023. "The Research Agenda on Smart Grids: Foresights for Social Acceptance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-31, September.
    17. Houljakbe Houlteurbe Dagou & Asli Pelin Gurgun & Kerim Koc & Cenk Budayan, 2025. "The Future of Construction: Integrating Innovative Technologies for Smarter Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-29, May.
    18. Omar Al-Ani & Sanjoy Das, 2022. "Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Applications in HEMS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-37, September.
    19. Liang Zhong & Shizhong Zhang & Yidu Zhang & Guang Chen & Yong Liu, 2021. "Joint Acquisition Time Design and Sensor Association for Wireless Sensor Networks in Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Cemal Zehir & Melike Zehir, 2022. "Emerging blockchain solutions in the mobility ecosystem: Associated risks and areas for applications," Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 4(2), pages 01-14, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3523-:d:1694239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.