IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i12p3148-d1679718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Structured Data Model for Asset Health Index Integration in Digital Twins of Energy Converters

Author

Listed:
  • Juan F. Gómez Fernández

    (Department of Industrial Management, University of Seville, 41004 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Eduardo Candón Fernández

    (Department of Industrial Management, University of Seville, 41004 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Adolfo Crespo Márquez

    (Department of Industrial Management, University of Seville, 41004 Sevilla, Spain)

Abstract

A persistent challenge in digital asset management is the lack of standardized models for integrating health assessment—such as the Asset Health Index (AHI)—into Digital Twins, limiting their extended implementation beyond individual projects. Asset managers in the energy sector face challenges of digitalization such as digital environment selection, employed digital modules (absence of an architecture guide) and their interconnection, sources of data, and how to automate the assessment and provide the results in a friendly decision support system. Thus, for energy systems, the integration of Asset Assessment in virtual replicas by Digital Twins is a complete way of asset management by enabling real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and lifecycle optimization. Another challenge in this context is how to compound in a structured assessment of asset condition, where the Asset Health Index (AHI) plays a critical role by consolidating heterogeneous data into a single, actionable indicator easy to interpret as a level of risk. This paper tries to serve as a guide against these digital and structured assessments to integrate AHI methodologies into Digital Twins for energy converters. First, the proposed AHI methodology is introduced, and after a structured data model specifically designed, orientated to a basic and economic cloud implementation architecture. This model has been developed fulfilling standardized practices of asset digitalization as the Reference Architecture Model for Industry 4.0 (RAMI 4.0), organizing asset-related information into interoperable domains including physical hierarchy, operational monitoring, reliability assessment, and risk-based decision-making. A Unified Modeling Language (UML) class diagram formalizes the data model for cloud Digital Twin implementation, which is deployed on Microsoft Azure Architecture using native Internet of Things (IoT) and analytics services to enable automated and real-time AHI calculation. This design and development has been realized from a scalable point of view and for future integration of Machine-Learning improvements. The proposed approach is validated through a case study involving three high-capacity converters in distinct operating environments, showing the model’s effective assistance in anticipating failures, optimizing maintenance strategies, and improving asset resilience. In the case study, AHI-based monitoring reduced unplanned failures by 43% and improved maintenance planning accuracy by over 30%.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan F. Gómez Fernández & Eduardo Candón Fernández & Adolfo Crespo Márquez, 2025. "A Structured Data Model for Asset Health Index Integration in Digital Twins of Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:12:p:3148-:d:1679718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/12/3148/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/12/3148/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank, Alejandro G. & Mendes, Glauco H.S. & Ayala, Néstor F. & Ghezzi, Antonio, 2019. "Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 341-351.
    2. Nguyen Thanh Viet & Alla G. Kravets, 2022. "The New Method for Analyzing Technology Trends of Smart Energy Asset Performance Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-26, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Rodrigues da Silva, Jassen & Cannarozzo Tinoco, Maria Auxiliadora & Saccani, Nicola & Frank, Alejandro G., 2025. "Artificial Intelligence capabilities in Digital Servitization: Identifying digital opportunities for different service types," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    2. Malewska, Kamila & Cyfert, Szymon & Chwiłkowska-Kubala, Anna & Mierzejewska, Katrzyna & Szumowski, Witold, 2024. "The missing link between digital transformation and business model innovation in energy SMEs: The role of digital organisational culture," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan & Thurer, Matthias, 2021. "Identifying pathways to a high-performing lean automation implementation: An empirical study in the manufacturing industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Jinkyo Shin & Md Alamgir Mollah & Jaehyeok Choi, 2023. "Sustainability and Organizational Performance in South Korea: The Effect of Digital Leadership on Digital Culture and Employees’ Digital Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Kajikawa, Yuya & Mejia, Cristian & Wu, Mengjia & Zhang, Yi, 2022. "Academic landscape of Technological Forecasting and Social Change through citation network and topic analyses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. Rongrong Zhou & Decai Tang & Dan Da & Wenya Chen & Lin Kong & Valentina Boamah, 2022. "Research on China’s Manufacturing Industry Moving towards the Middle and High-End of the GVC Driven by Digital Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    8. Zhihua Lai & Bifeng Wang & Xiang He, 2023. "Research on the Digital Transformation of Producer Services to Drive Manufacturing Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Xing, Manjiang & Gong, Chi & Moon, Gyu-Hyen & Ge, Xiaohong, 2025. "Digital economy, dual innovation capability and enterprise labor productivity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Yüksel, Hilmi, 2020. "An empirical evaluation of industry 4.0 applications of companies in Turkey: The case of a developing country," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Guilherme F. Frederico, 2021. "From Supply Chain 4.0 to Supply Chain 5.0: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review and Research Directions," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Exploring the interplay between Smart Manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    13. Gupta, Shivam & Justy, Théo & Kamboj, Shampy & Kumar, Ajay & Kristoffersen, Eivind, 2021. "Big data and firm marketing performance: Findings from knowledge-based view," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    14. Tao, Zhibin & Chao, Jiaxiao, 2024. "Unlocking new opportunities in the industry 4.0 era, exploring the critical impact of digital technology on sustainable performance and the mediating role of GSCM practices," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    15. Wei, Shuang & Liu, Weihua & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Dong, Jing-xin & Long, Shangsong, 2024. "The influence of key components and digital technologies on manufacturer's choice of innovation strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1210-1220.
    16. Ching-Hung Lee & Dianni Wang & Kevin C. Desouza & Richard Evans, 2021. "Digital Transformation and the New Normal in China: How Can Enterprises Use Digital Technologies to Respond to COVID-19?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-11, September.
    17. Arias-Pérez, José & Vélez-Jaramillo, Juan, 2022. "Ignoring the three-way interaction of digital orientation, Not-invented-here syndrome and employee's artificial intelligence awareness in digital innovation performance: A recipe for failure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Chiarello, Filippo & Fantoni, Gualtiero & Hogarth, Terence & Giordano, Vito & Baltina, Liga & Spada, Irene, 2021. "Towards ESCO 4.0 – Is the European classification of skills in line with Industry 4.0? A text mining approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Li, Xiaolin & Zhang, Mengjie & Li, Weiwen & Chen, Juanyi, 2025. "Looking for new possibilities in emerging industries: The impact of strategic sensing capability on high-tech startups’ product innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Mounir Dahmani & Mohamed Mabrouki & Adel Ben Youssef, 2022. "ICT, trade openness and economic growth in Tunisia: what is going wrong?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 2317-2336, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:12:p:3148-:d:1679718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.