IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i6p1315-d1354081.html

The Advantage of Citrus Residues as Feedstock for Biogas Production: A Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion System

Author

Listed:
  • Camilo Andrés Guerrero-Martin

    (Energy and Sea Research Group (Grupo de Pesquisa em Energia e Mar), Universidade Federal do Pará, Campus Universitário de Salinópolis, Salinópolis-Pará 68721-000, Brazil
    Department of Engineering, Federal University of Pará—Campus Salinópolis, Rua Raimundo Santana Cruz, S/N, Bairro São Tomé, Salinópolis 68721-000, Brazil)

  • Angie Natalia Rojas-Sanchez

    (Non-Conventional Separation Processes Research Group (GPS), Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de América, Av. Circunvalar #20-53, Bogotá 110311, Colombia)

  • David Fernando Cruz-Pinzón

    (Non-Conventional Separation Processes Research Group (GPS), Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de América, Av. Circunvalar #20-53, Bogotá 110311, Colombia)

  • Harvey Andres Milquez-Sanabria

    (Non-Conventional Separation Processes Research Group (GPS), Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de América, Av. Circunvalar #20-53, Bogotá 110311, Colombia)

  • David Leonardo Sotelo-Tobon

    (Non-Conventional Separation Processes Research Group (GPS), Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de América, Av. Circunvalar #20-53, Bogotá 110311, Colombia)

  • Ana Laura Ribeiro da Cunha

    (Energy and Sea Research Group (Grupo de Pesquisa em Energia e Mar), Universidade Federal do Pará, Campus Universitário de Salinópolis, Salinópolis-Pará 68721-000, Brazil
    Department of Engineering, Federal University of Pará—Campus Salinópolis, Rua Raimundo Santana Cruz, S/N, Bairro São Tomé, Salinópolis 68721-000, Brazil)

  • Raúl Salinas-Silva

    (Fundación de Educación Superior San José—Usanjose, Bogotá 110311, Colombia)

  • Stefanny Camacho-Galindo

    (Fundación de Educación Superior San José—Usanjose, Bogotá 110311, Colombia)

  • Vando José Costa Gomes

    (Energy and Sea Research Group (Grupo de Pesquisa em Energia e Mar), Universidade Federal do Pará, Campus Universitário de Salinópolis, Salinópolis-Pará 68721-000, Brazil
    Department of Engineering, Federal University of Pará—Campus Salinópolis, Rua Raimundo Santana Cruz, S/N, Bairro São Tomé, Salinópolis 68721-000, Brazil)

  • Diego Cunha Malagueta

    (Mechanical Engineering (IPoli/UFRJ) and Energy Planning (Coppe/UFRJ), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
    Climate and Energy (PPGC&E/UENF), Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro 28013-602, Brazil)

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is an important step in waste recovery. In Colombia, the production of citrus food significantly contributes to environmental impact via waste generation. In 2021, the waste produced, specifically citrus rind, amounted to 725,035 tons/year. During degradation, wastes generate leachate and greenhouse gases (GHGs), which negatively impact water sources (leachate), soil, and human and animal health. This article describes the design of a two-phase biodigestion system for the degradation of organic matter and biogas production. The system uses citrus waste to produce biogas with neutral emissions. The biodigestion process begins with the stabilization of the methanogenesis reactor (UASB), which takes approximately 19 days. During this period, the biogas produced contains approximately 60% methane by volume. Subsequently, the packed bed reactor operates for 7 days, where hydrolytic and acetogenic bacteria decompose the citrus waste, leading to the production and accumulation of volatile fatty acids. The final step involves combining the two phases for 5 days, resulting in a daily biogas production ranging from 700 to 1100 mL. Of this biogas, 54.90% is methane ( C H 4 ) with a yield of 0.51 L C H 4 g S V − 1 . This study assesses the methane production capacity of citrus waste, with the process benefiting from the pH value of the leachate, enhancing its degradability. Consequently, this approach leads to a notable 27.30% reduction in solids within the digestion system. The two-phase anaerobic biodigestion system described in this article demonstrates a promising method to mitigate the environmental impact of citrus waste while concurrently producing a renewable source of energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Camilo Andrés Guerrero-Martin & Angie Natalia Rojas-Sanchez & David Fernando Cruz-Pinzón & Harvey Andres Milquez-Sanabria & David Leonardo Sotelo-Tobon & Ana Laura Ribeiro da Cunha & Raúl Salinas-Silv, 2024. "The Advantage of Citrus Residues as Feedstock for Biogas Production: A Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1315-:d:1354081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/6/1315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bi, Shaojie & Qiao, Wei & Xiong, Linpeng & Ricci, Marina & Adani, Fabrizio & Dong, Renjie, 2019. "Effects of organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 242-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Yapeng & Hu, Wanrong & Qiao, Wei & Westerholm, Maria & Wandera, Simon M. & Dong, Renjie, 2022. "Upgrading the performance of high solids feeding anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under extremely high ammonia level," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 13-20.
    2. Bi, Shaojie & Westerholm, Maria & Hu, Wanrong & Mahdy, Ahmed & Dong, Taili & Sun, Yingcai & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "The metabolic performance and microbial communities of anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under stressed ammonia condition: A case study of a 10-year successful biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 644-651.
    3. Yapeng Song & Wei Qiao & Jiahao Zhang & Renjie Dong, 2023. "Process Performance and Functional Microbial Community in the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Chen, Yichao & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wan, Liping & Li, Dong, 2021. "The screening of early warning indicators and microbial community of chicken manure thermophilic digestion at high organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    5. Anna Jasińska & Anna Grosser & Erik Meers, 2023. "Possibilities and Limitations of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Animal Manure—A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, May.
    6. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Zhou, Pan & Liu, Xiaofeng & Li, Dong, 2021. "The role of oxidation-reduction potential as an early warning indicator, and a microbial instability mechanism in a pilot-scale anaerobic mesophilic digestion of chicken manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 223-232.
    8. Xiao, Youqian & Yang, Hongnan & Zheng, Dan & Liu, Yi & Deng, Liangwei, 2022. "Alleviation of ammonia inhibition in dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    9. Ombretta Paladino, 2022. "Data Driven Modelling and Control Strategies to Improve Biogas Quality and Production from High Solids Anaerobic Digestion: A Mini Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Liu, Zihao & Foong, Shin Ying & Zhang, Yang & Li, Yameng & Hu, Bing & Liew, Rock Keey & Lam, Su Shiung & Ai, Fuke & Liu, Zihan & Zhu, Feiyang & Wang, Wanpeng & Zhou, Xiying & Tao, Junyu & Zhang, Zhipi, 2025. "Proactive detection, prediction, and control of instabilities in anaerobic digestion systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    11. Siqi Zuo & Xiaoqin Zhou & Zifu Li & Xuemei Wang & Longbin Yu, 2021. "Investigation on Recycling Dry Toilet Generated Blackwater by Anaerobic Digestion: From Energy Recovery to Sanitation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    12. Fei Wang & Mengfu Pei & Ling Qiu & Yiqing Yao & Congguang Zhang & Hong Qiang, 2019. "Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    13. M. Devendran Manogaran & Mohd Hakimi & Mohammad Harith Nizam Basheer Ahmad & Rashid Shamsuddin & Jun Wei Lim & Muzamil Abdalla M Hassan & Nurul Tasnim Sahrin, 2023. "Effect of Temperature on Co-Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure and Empty Fruit Bunch: A Kinetic Parametric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, March.
    14. Bi, Shaojie & Qiao, Wei & Xiong, Linpeng & Mahdy, Ahmed & Wandera, Simon M. & Yin, Dongmin & Dong, Renjie, 2020. "Improved high solid anaerobic digestion of chicken manure by moderate in situ ammonia stripping and its relation to metabolic pathway," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2380-2389.
    15. Bi, Shaojie & Wang, Chunshuang & Wang, Haipeng & Du, Yanli & Yu, Xinhui & Wang, Yanjie, 2024. "Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: Focusing on methanogenic performance and pathogens removal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    16. Bi, Shaojie & Hong, Xiujie & Yang, Hongzhi & Yu, Xinhui & Fang, Shumei & Bai, Yan & Liu, Jinli & Gao, Yamei & Yan, Lei & Wang, Weidong & Wang, Yanjie, 2020. "Effect of hydraulic retention time on anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and food waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 213-220.
    17. Shiqing Qian & Luming Chen & Sunqiang Xu & Cai Zeng & Xueqi Lian & Zitong Xia & Jintuo Zou, 2025. "Research on Methane-Rich Biogas Production Technology by Anaerobic Digestion Under Carbon Neutrality: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-30, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:6:p:1315-:d:1354081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.