IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i16p4172-d1461143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermoeconomic Evaluation of a High-Performance Solar Biogas Polygeneration System

Author

Listed:
  • José Luciano Batista Moreira

    (Graduate Program in Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil)

  • Adriano da Silva Marques

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil)

  • Taynara Geysa Silva do Lago

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil)

  • Victor Carlos de Lima Arruda

    (Graduate Program in Renewable Energy, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil)

  • Monica Carvalho

    (Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa 58051-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Because of the higher efficiencies achieved by polygeneration systems compared with conventional generation systems, they have been increasingly adopted to reduce the consumption of resources and consequent environmental damage. Heat dissipated by equipment can be harnessed and reused in a cascade manner. This study applies the Theory of Exergetic Cost (TEC), a thermoeconomic approach, to a high-performance polygeneration system. The system includes a biogas-fueled internal combustion engine, a water–ammonia absorption refrigeration system driven by the engine’s exhaust gases, and a set of photovoltaic panels with a cooling system coupled to solar panels and a hot water storage tank. The pieces of equipment are dimensioned and selected according to the energy demands of a hotel. Then, the temperature, pressure, and energy flows are established for each point of the system. Mass, energy, and exergy balances are developed to determine exergy flows and efficiencies. The main component in terms of exergy and operation costs is the engine, which consumes 0.0613 kg/s of biogas, produces 376.80 kW of electricity, and provides thermal energy for the refrigeration system (101.57 kW) and the hot water tank (232.55 kW), considering the average operating regime throughout the day. The levelized costs are 2.69 USD/h for electricity, 1.70 USD/h for hot water (thermal energy tank), and 1.73 USD/h for chilled water (absorption chiller). The thermoeconomic diagnosis indicated that the hot water tank and the engine are the most sensitive to changes in the maintenance factor. Reducing operating expenses by 20% for the tank and engine lowers energy costs by 10.75% for the tank and 9.81% for the engine.

Suggested Citation

  • José Luciano Batista Moreira & Adriano da Silva Marques & Taynara Geysa Silva do Lago & Victor Carlos de Lima Arruda & Monica Carvalho, 2024. "Thermoeconomic Evaluation of a High-Performance Solar Biogas Polygeneration System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:16:p:4172-:d:1461143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/16/4172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/16/4172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gimelli, A. & Muccillo, M., 2019. "Performance assessment of a 15 kW Micro-CHCP plant through the 0D/1D thermo-fluid dynamic characterization of a double water circuit waste heat recovery system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 803-814.
    2. Marques, Adriano S. & Carvalho, Monica & Ochoa, Alvaro A.V. & Abrahão, Raphael & Santos, Carlos A.C., 2021. "Life cycle assessment and comparative exergoenvironmental evaluation of a micro-trigeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Lozano, M.A. & Valero, A., 1993. "Theory of the exergetic cost," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 939-960.
    4. Yamano, Shuhei & Nakaya, Takashi & Ikegami, Takashi & Nakayama, Masayuki & Akisawa, Atsushi, 2021. "Optimization modeling of mixed gas engine types with different maintenance spans and costs: Case study OF CCHP to evaluate optimal gas engine operations and combination of the types," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beretta, Gian Paolo & Iora, Paolo & Ghoniem, Ahmed F., 2014. "Allocating resources and products in multi-hybrid multi-cogeneration: What fractions of heat and power are renewable in hybrid fossil-solar CHP?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 587-603.
    2. Lukas Kriechbaum & Philipp Gradl & Romeo Reichenhauser & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Modelling Grid Constraints in a Multi-Energy Municipal Energy System Using Cumulative Exergy Consumption Minimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Gad, M.S. & Uysal, Cuneyt & El-Shafay, A.S. & Ağbulut, Ümit, 2024. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic assessments of a diesel engine fuelled with waste chicken fat biodiesel-diesel blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    4. Kwak, H.-Y. & Kim, D.-J. & Jeon, J.-S., 2003. "Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 343-360.
    5. Khaljani, M. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Bahlouli, K., 2015. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic optimization of an integrated gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2136-2145.
    6. Wang, Xurong & Yang, Yi & Zheng, Ya & Dai, Yiping, 2017. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a supercritical CO2 cycle for a cogeneration application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 971-982.
    7. Palacios-Bereche, M.C. & Palacios-Bereche, R. & Ensinas, A.V. & Gallego, A. Garrido & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, S.A., 2022. "Brazilian sugar cane industry – A survey on future improvements in the process energy management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Yutong Zhao & Shuang Zeng & Yifeng Ding & Lin Ma & Zhao Wang & Anqi Liang & Hongbo Ren, 2024. "Cost–Benefit Analysis of Distributed Energy Systems Considering the Monetization of Indirect Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, January.
    9. Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Amidpour, M., 2012. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of an ammonia–water power/cooling cogeneration cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 271-283.
    10. Silva, J.A.M. & Flórez-Orrego, D. & Oliveira, S., 2014. "An exergy based approach to determine production cost and CO2 allocation for petroleum derived fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 490-495.
    11. Marco F. Torchio, 2013. "Energy-Exergy, Environmental and Economic Criteria in Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Plants: Indexes for the Evaluation of the Cogeneration Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Usón, Sergio & Valero, Antonio & Agudelo, Andrés, 2012. "Thermoeconomics and Industrial Symbiosis. Effect of by-product integration in cost assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 43-51.
    13. Tonon, S. & Brown, M.T. & Luchi, F. & Mirandola, A. & Stoppato, A. & Ulgiati, S., 2006. "An integrated assessment of energy conversion processes by means of thermodynamic, economic and environmental parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 149-163.
    14. Lozano, Miguel A. & Serra, Luis M. & Pina, Eduardo A., 2022. "Optimal design of trigeneration systems for buildings considering cooperative game theory for allocating production cost to energy services," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    15. Bargos, Fabiano Fernandes & Lamas, Wendell de Queiróz & Bilato, Gabriel Adam, 2018. "Computational tools and operational research for optimal design of co-generation systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 507-516.
    16. Rezaei, M. & Anisur, M.R. & Mahfuz, M.H. & Kibria, M.A. & Saidur, R. & Metselaar, I.H.S.C., 2013. "Performance and cost analysis of phase change materials with different melting temperatures in heating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 173-178.
    17. Verda, Vittorio & Borchiellini, Romano, 2004. "Exergetic and economic evaluation of control strategies for a gas turbine plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2253-2271.
    18. Luis F. Villalón-López & Víctor M. Ambriz-Díaz & Carlos Rubio-Maya & Oscar Chávez & Israel Y. Rosas, 2024. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic Analysis, and Optimization in a Natural Gas Decompression Station with a Vortex Tube and Geothermal Preheating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-33, February.
    19. Pina, Eduardo A. & Lozano, Miguel A. & Serra, Luis M., 2018. "Thermoeconomic cost allocation in simple trigeneration systems including thermal energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 170-184.
    20. Christoph Sejkora & Lisa Kühberger & Fabian Radner & Alexander Trattner & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Exergy as Criteria for Efficient Energy Systems—A Spatially Resolved Comparison of the Current Exergy Consumption, the Current Useful Exergy Demand and Renewable Exergy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-51, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:16:p:4172-:d:1461143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.