IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i9p3639-d1131065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Surface Mining 4.0 in Terms of Technological Shock in Energy Transition: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey Zhironkin

    (School of Engineering Entrepreneurship, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30 Lenina St., 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

  • Ekaterina Taran

    (School of Engineering Entrepreneurship, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30 Lenina St., 634050 Tomsk, Russia)

Abstract

The expansion of end-to-end Industry 4.0 technologies in various industries has caused a technological shock in the mineral resource sector, wherein itsdigital maturity is lower than in the manufacturing sector. As a result of the shock, the productivity and profitability of raw materials extraction has begun to lag behind the industries of its deep processing, which, in the conditions of volatile raw materials markets, can provoke sectoral crises. The diffusion of Industry 4.0 technologies in the mining sector (Mining 4.0) can prevent a technological shock if they are implemented in all segments, including quarrying (Surface Mining 4.0). The Surface Mining 4.0 technological platform would connect the advanced achievements of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (end-to-end digital artificial intelligence technologies, cyber-physical systems and unmanned production with traditional geotechnology) without canceling them, but instead bringing them to a new level of productivity, resource consumption, and environmental friendliness. In the future, the development of Surface Mining 4.0 will provide a response to the technological shock associated with the acceleration of the digital modernization of the mining sector and the increase in labor productivity, which are reducing the operating costs of raw materials extraction. In this regard, the given review is an attempt to analyze the surface mining digital transformation over the course of the diffusion of Industry 4.0 technologies covered in scientific publications. The authors tried to show the core and frontiers of Surface Mining 4.0 development to determine the production, economic, and social effect of replacing humans with digital and cyber-physical systems in the processes of mineral extraction. Particular attention was paid to the review of research on the role of Surface Mining 4.0 in achieving sustainable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey Zhironkin & Ekaterina Taran, 2023. "Development of Surface Mining 4.0 in Terms of Technological Shock in Energy Transition: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-31, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:3639-:d:1131065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/9/3639/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/9/3639/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Temitope Adeyemi-Kayode & Sanjay Misra & Hope Orovwode & Anthony Adoghe, 2022. "Modeling the Next Decade of Energy Sustainability: A Case of a Developing Country," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Sterba, Jiri & Krzemień, Alicja & Riesgo Fernández, Pedro & Escanciano García-Miranda, Carmen & Fidalgo Valverde, Gregorio, 2019. "Lithium mining: Accelerating the transition to sustainable energy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 416-426.
    3. John H. T. Luong & Cang Tran & Di Ton-That, 2022. "A Paradox over Electric Vehicles, Mining of Lithium for Car Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Badera, Jarosław & Kocoń, Paweł, 2014. "Local community opinions regarding the socio-environmental aspects of lignite surface mining: Experiences from central Poland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 507-516.
    5. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Lisa Holden, 2023. "Changes in the Polish Coal Sector Economic Situation with the Background of the European Union Energy Security and Eco-Efficiency Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Sergey Zhironkin & Michal Cehlár, 2021. "Coal Mining Sustainable Development: Economics and Technological Outlook," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-8, August.
    7. Adam Duda & Gregorio Fidalgo Valverde, 2021. "The Economics of Coking Coal Mining: A Fossil Fuel Still Needed for Steel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Kozłowska-Woszczycka & Katarzyna Pactwa, 2022. "Social License for Closure—A Participatory Approach to the Management of the Mine Closure Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Farida M. Issatayeva & Gulnara M. Aubakirova & Aliya D. Maussymbayeva & Lyussiya I. Togaibayeva & Valery V. Biryukov & Elena Vechkinzova, 2023. "Fuel and Energy Complex of Kazakhstan: Geological and Economic Assessment of Enterprises in the Context of Digital Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Van Dael, Miet & Lizin, Sebastien & Swinnen, Gilbert & Van Passel, Steven, 2017. "Young people’s acceptance of bioenergy and the influence of attitude strength on information provision," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 417-430.
    4. Leena Suopajärvi & Thomas Ejdemo & Elena Klyuchnikova & Elena Korchak & Vigdis Nygaard & Gregory A. Poelzer, 2017. "Social impacts of the “glocal” mining business: case studies from Northern Europe," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 30(1), pages 31-39, April.
    5. Sholpan Smagulova & Bakhytgul Chereyeva & Saltanat Zhakupova & Saule Intykbayeva & Bayan Abdulina & Taizhan Sarzhanov & Gulnar Abdulina & Aigerim Abeldanova, 2024. "Assessment of the Impact of Electric Power Production on the Economic Growth of Kazakhstan," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 391-407, July.
    6. Adam Duda & Gregorio Fidalgo Valverde, 2021. "The Economics of Coking Coal Mining: A Fossil Fuel Still Needed for Steel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-12, November.
    7. Ocelík, Petr & Osička, Jan & Zapletalová, Veronika & Černoch, Filip & Dančák, Břetislav, 2017. "Local opposition and acceptance of a deep geological repository of radioactive waste in the Czech Republic: A frame analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 458-466.
    8. Woźniak, Justyna & Jurczyk, Weronika, 2020. "Social and environmental activities in the Polish mining region in the context of CSR," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Kamil Lubiński & Magdalena Grębosz-Krawczyk, 2024. "Economical, Innovative, or Ecological? What Are the Green Energy Users?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Svobodova, Kamila & Yellishetty, Mohan & Vojar, Jiri, 2019. "Coal mining in Australia: Understanding stakeholder knowledge of mining and mine rehabilitation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 421-430.
    11. Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz & Przemysław Mućko, 2016. "CSR Reporting Practices of Polish Energy and Mining Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Walsh, Bríd & van der Plank, Sien & Behrens, Paul, 2017. "The effect of community consultation on perceptions of a proposed mine: A case study from southeast Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 163-171.
    13. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Lisa Holden, 2023. "Changes in the Polish Coal Sector Economic Situation with the Background of the European Union Energy Security and Eco-Efficiency Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Lisa Holden & Tomasz Rokicki, 2022. "The Role of Renewable Energy Sources in Electricity Production in Poland and the Background of Energy Policy of the European Union at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Crisis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Michał Rejdak & Grzegorz Gałko & Marcin Sajdak & Aleksandra Wieczorek, 2022. "Stamp-Charged Coke-Making Technology—An Empirical Model for Prediction of Coal Charge Density for Stamp Charging Coke Oven Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Binta Yahaya & S A J Obansa & Malanta Sabiu Abdullahi, 2023. "Modeling the Demand-Supply Mismatch and Price Optimization of Natural Gas in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(8), pages 187-197, August.
    17. Dmitry A. Ruban & Natalia N. Yashalova, 2024. "Strategic priorities of corporate policy in lithium mining: do mission statements mark a road to sustainability?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 15711-15731, June.
    18. Magdalena Zięba & Adam Smoliński, 2025. "Methane Emissions from Mining in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Iwona Markuszewska, 2021. "The Energy Landscape versus the Farming Landscape: The Immortal Era of Coal?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    20. Riesgo García, María Victoria & Krzemień, Alicja & Sáiz Bárcena, Lourdes Cecilia & Diego Álvarez, Isidro & Castañón Fernández, César, 2019. "Scoping studies of rare earth mining investments: Deciding on further project developments," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:3639-:d:1131065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.