IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7526-d1278084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Integration of Tools for the Techno-Economic Evaluation of Fixed and Floating Tidal Energy Deployment in the Irish Sea

Author

Listed:
  • Ross O’Connell

    (Environmental Research Institute (ERI), University College Cork, P43 C573 Cork, Ireland)

  • Mitra Kamidelivand

    (Environmental Research Institute (ERI), University College Cork, P43 C573 Cork, Ireland)

  • Ioannis Polydoros

    (Energy and Environment Research Group, Zienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Bay Campus, Swansea University, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK)

  • Christopher Wright

    (Gavin and Doherty Geosolutions, Unit A2, Nutgrove Office Park, Rathfarnham, D14 X627 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Paul Bonar

    (Gavin and Doherty Geosolutions, Unit A2, Nutgrove Office Park, Rathfarnham, D14 X627 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Alison J. Williams

    (Energy and Environment Research Group, Zienkiewicz Centre for Computational Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Bay Campus, Swansea University, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK)

  • Jimmy Murphy

    (Environmental Research Institute (ERI), University College Cork, P43 C573 Cork, Ireland)

Abstract

Marine renewable energy (MRE) development will be crucial to achieve worldwide energy decarbonization. In Europe, 1 GW and 40 GW of ocean energy are set to be developed by 2030 and 2050, respectively. Support is essential if wave and tidal stream arrays are to become more economically viable than they currently are. Four recently developed open-access software tools are used in this study to investigate the critical and expensive elements of potential demonstration and commercial scale tidal projects. The tools have been designed and built to assist users with array configurations, foundation and mooring (F&M) design, operation and maintenance (O&M) strategies, and techno-economic analysis. Demonstration of their use is performed in this study to model scenarios for 2 MW, 10 MW, 40 MW, and 100 MW tidal energy projects employing typical 500 kW fixed and 2 MW floating turbines at the West Anglesey Tidal Demonstration Zone in the Irish Sea. The following metrics are examined: the power output and wake losses of staggered and line configurations; the design and costs of simple gravity-based foundations, gravity-based anchors and the four-chain catenary mooring system of a single turbine; the mean O&M costs and farm availability over the project life; and the breakdown of levelized cost of energy (LCoE) for all eight scenarios to ultimately reveal minimum values of 173 EUR/MWh and 147 EUR/MWh for fixed and floating tidal energy technologies, respectively. The thorough analysis facilitated within these four tools to forecast realistic situations in a specific location can help users design a tidal energy project for an area with considerable potential for commercial scale projects, and thus assist the ocean energy community in promoting and nurturing the sector in the years and decades ahead.

Suggested Citation

  • Ross O’Connell & Mitra Kamidelivand & Ioannis Polydoros & Christopher Wright & Paul Bonar & Alison J. Williams & Jimmy Murphy, 2023. "The Integration of Tools for the Techno-Economic Evaluation of Fixed and Floating Tidal Energy Deployment in the Irish Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7526-:d:1278084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7526/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7526/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malki, Rami & Masters, Ian & Williams, Alison J. & Nick Croft, T., 2014. "Planning tidal stream turbine array layouts using a coupled blade element momentum – computational fluid dynamics model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 46-54.
    2. Badoe, Charles E. & Edmunds, Matt & Williams, Alison J. & Nambiar, Anup & Sellar, Brian & Kiprakis, Aristides & Masters, Ian, 2022. "Robust validation of a generalised actuator disk CFD model for tidal turbine analysis using the FloWave ocean energy research facility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 232-250.
    3. Zoe Goss & Daniel Coles & Matthew Piggott, 2021. "Economic analysis of tidal stream turbine arrays: a review," Papers 2105.04718, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Siyi & Zhang, Mingrui & Piggott, Matthew D., 2023. "End-to-end wind turbine wake modelling with deep graph representation learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    2. Fairley, I. & Masters, I. & Karunarathna, H., 2015. "The cumulative impact of tidal stream turbine arrays on sediment transport in the Pentland Firth," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 755-769.
    3. Clemente Gotelli & Mirko Musa & Michele Guala & Cristián Escauriaza, 2019. "Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Wake Interactions of Marine Hydrokinetic Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Zangiabadi, E. & Masters, I. & Williams, Alison J. & Croft, T.N. & Malki, R. & Edmunds, M. & Mason-Jones, A. & Horsfall, I., 2017. "Computational prediction of pressure change in the vicinity of tidal stream turbines and the consequences for fish survival rate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1141-1156.
    5. Ian Masters & Alison Williams & T. Nick Croft & Michael Togneri & Matt Edmunds & Enayatollah Zangiabadi & Iain Fairley & Harshinie Karunarathna, 2015. "A Comparison of Numerical Modelling Techniques for Tidal Stream Turbine Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Goss, Z.L. & Coles, D.S. & Kramer, S.C. & Piggott, M.D., 2021. "Efficient economic optimisation of large-scale tidal stream arrays," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    7. Chee M. Pang & David M. Kennedy & Fergal O’Rourke, 2024. "An Investigation of Tidal Stream Turbine Wake Development Using Modified BEM–AD Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Li, Xiaorong & Li, Ming & Jordan, Laura-Beth & McLelland, Stuart & Parsons, Daniel R. & Amoudry, Laurent O. & Song, Qingyang & Comerford, Liam, 2019. "Modelling impacts of tidal stream turbines on surface waves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 725-734.
    9. Edmunds, Matt & Williams, Alison J. & Masters, Ian & Banerjee, Arindam & VanZwieten, James H., 2020. "A spatially nonlinear generalised actuator disk model for the simulation of horizontal axis wind and tidal turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    10. Nag, Aditya Kumar & Sarkar, Shibayan, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of a micro-hydropower plant consists of hydrokinetic turbines arranged in different array formations for rural power supply," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 475-487.
    11. González-Gorbeña, Eduardo & Qassim, Raad Y. & Rosman, Paulo C.C., 2016. "Optimisation of hydrokinetic turbine array layouts via surrogate modelling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 45-57.
    12. Cooke, S.C. & Willden, R.H.J. & Byrne, B.W., 2016. "The potential of cross-stream aligned sub-arrays to increase tidal turbine efficiency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 284-292.
    13. Van Thinh Nguyen & Alina Santa Cruz & Sylvain S. Guillou & Mohamad N. Shiekh Elsouk & Jérôme Thiébot, 2019. "Effects of the Current Direction on the Energy Production of a Tidal Farm: The Case of Raz Blanchard (France)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Hachmann, Christoph & Stallard, Tim & Stansby, Peter & Lin, Binliang, 2021. "Experimentally validated study of the impact of operating strategies on power efficiency of a turbine array in a bi-directional tidal channel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1408-1426.
    15. Federico Attene & Francesco Balduzzi & Alessandro Bianchini & M. Sergio Campobasso, 2020. "Using Experimentally Validated Navier-Stokes CFD to Minimize Tidal Stream Turbine Power Losses Due to Wake/Turbine Interactions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-26, October.
    16. Chawdhary, Saurabh & Hill, Craig & Yang, Xiaolei & Guala, Michele & Corren, Dean & Colby, Jonathan & Sotiropoulos, Fotis, 2017. "Wake characteristics of a TriFrame of axial-flow hydrokinetic turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 332-345.
    17. Donald R. Noble & Samuel Draycott & Anup Nambiar & Brian G. Sellar & Jeffrey Steynor & Aristides Kiprakis, 2020. "Experimental Assessment of Flow, Performance, and Loads for Tidal Turbines in a Closely-Spaced Array," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Craig Hill & Vincent S. Neary & Michele Guala & Fotis Sotiropoulos, 2020. "Performance and Wake Characterization of a Model Hydrokinetic Turbine: The Reference Model 1 (RM1) Dual Rotor Tidal Energy Converter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Ramos, V. & Carballo, R. & Ringwood, John V., 2019. "Application of the actuator disc theory of Delft3D-FLOW to model far-field hydrodynamic impacts of tidal turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1320-1335.
    20. Syed Ahmed Kabir, Ijaz Fazil & Safiyullah, Ferozkhan & Ng, E.Y.K. & Tam, Vivian W.Y., 2020. "New analytical wake models based on artificial intelligence and rivalling the benchmark full-rotor CFD predictions under both uniform and ABL inflows," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7526-:d:1278084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.