IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i15p5835-d1211844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing Sustainable Decomposition of Biomass Tar Model Compound: Machine Learning, Kinetic Modeling, and Experimental Investigation in a Non-Thermal Plasma Dielectric Barrier Discharge Reactor

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Yousaf Arshad

    (Corporate Sustainability and Digital Chemical Management Division, Interloop Limited, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
    Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Azam Saeed

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Wasim Tahir

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Halina Pawlak-Kruczek

    (Department of Energy Conversion Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wyb.Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Anam Suhail Ahmad

    (Halliburton Worldwide, 3000, N Sam Houston Parkway E, Houston, TX 77032-3219, USA)

  • Lukasz Niedzwiecki

    (Department of Energy Conversion Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wyb.Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
    Energy Research Centre, Centre for Energy and Environmental Technologies, VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This study examines the sustainable decomposition reactions of benzene using non-thermal plasma (NTP) in a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) reactor. The aim is to investigate the factors influencing benzene decomposition process, including input power, concentration, and residence time, through kinetic modeling, reactor performance assessment, and machine learning techniques. To further enhance the understanding and modeling of the decomposition process, the researchers determine the apparent decomposition rate constant, which is incorporated into a kinetic model using a novel theoretical plug flow reactor analogy model. The resulting reactor model is simulated using the ODE45 solver in MATLAB, with advanced machine learning algorithms and performance metrics such as RMSE, MSE, and MAE employed to improve accuracy. The analysis reveals that higher input discharge power and longer residence time result in increased tar analogue compound (TAC) decomposition. The results indicate that higher input discharge power leads to a significant improvement in the TAC decomposition rate, reaching 82.9%. The machine learning model achieved very good agreement with the experiments, showing a decomposition rate of 83.01%. The model flagged potential hotspots at 15% and 25% of the reactor’s length, which is important in terms of engineering design of scaled-up reactors.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Yousaf Arshad & Muhammad Azam Saeed & Muhammad Wasim Tahir & Halina Pawlak-Kruczek & Anam Suhail Ahmad & Lukasz Niedzwiecki, 2023. "Advancing Sustainable Decomposition of Biomass Tar Model Compound: Machine Learning, Kinetic Modeling, and Experimental Investigation in a Non-Thermal Plasma Dielectric Barrier Discharge Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5835-:d:1211844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5835/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5835/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anis, Samsudin & Zainal, Z.A., 2011. "Tar reduction in biomass producer gas via mechanical, catalytic and thermal methods: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2355-2377, June.
    2. Carotenuto, Alberto & Di Fraia, Simona & Massarotti, Nicola & Sobek, Szymon & Uddin, M. Rakib & Vanoli, Laura & Werle, Sebastian, 2023. "Predictive modeling for energy recovery from sewage sludge gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    3. Devin Peck & Mark Zappi & Daniel Gang & John Guillory & Rafael Hernandez & Prashanth Buchireddy, 2023. "Review of Porous Ceramics for Hot Gas Cleanup of Biomass Syngas Using Catalytic Ceramic Filters to Produce Green Hydrogen/Fuels/Chemicals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-32, February.
    4. Małgorzata Sieradzka & Agata Mlonka-Mędrala & Izabela Kalemba-Rec & Markus Reinmöller & Felix Küster & Wojciech Kalawa & Aneta Magdziarz, 2022. "Evaluation of Physical and Chemical Properties of Residue from Gasification of Biomass Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Čespiva, Jakub & Wnukowski, Mateusz & Niedzwiecki, Lukasz & Skřínský, Jan & Vereš, Ján & Ochodek, Tadeáš & Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina & Borovec, Karel, 2020. "Characterization of tars from a novel, pilot scale, biomass gasifier working under low equivalence ratio regime," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 775-785.
    6. Cheng Yang & Kanfeng Ying & Fan Yang & Huanghu Peng & Zezhou Chen, 2022. "Simulation on the Electric and Thermal Fields of a Microwave Reactor for Ex Situ Biomass Tar Elimination," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Font Palma, Carolina, 2013. "Modelling of tar formation and evolution for biomass gasification: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 129-141.
    8. Ratkiewicz, Artur & Truong, Thanh N., 2012. "A canonical form of the complex reaction mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 64-72.
    9. Wang, Duo & Yuan, Wenqiao & Ji, Wei, 2011. "Char and char-supported nickel catalysts for secondary syngas cleanup and conditioning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1656-1663, May.
    10. Alessandro Antonio Papa & Elisa Savuto & Andrea Di Carlo & Alessandra Tacconi & Sergio Rapagnà, 2023. "Synergic Effects of Bed Materials and Catalytic Filter Candle for the Conversion of Tar during Biomass Steam Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Tim Voigt & Martin Kohlhase & Oliver Nelles, 2021. "Incremental DoE and Modeling Methodology with Gaussian Process Regression: An Industrially Applicable Approach to Incorporate Expert Knowledge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Mateusz Wnukowski & Wojciech Moroń, 2021. "Warm Plasma Application in Tar Conversion and Syngas Valorization: The Fate of Hydrogen Sulfide," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    13. Eric Cebekhulu & Adeiza James Onumanyi & Sherrin John Isaac, 2022. "Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Energy Demand–Supply Prediction in Smart Grids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Sebastian Werle & Mariusz Dudziak, 2014. "Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Dried Sewage Sludge and By-Products of Dried Sewage Sludge Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Yousaf Arshad & Muhammad Azam Saeed & Muhammad Wasim Tahir & Ahsan Raza & Anam Suhail Ahmad & Fasiha Tahir & Bartłomiej Borkowski & Tadeusz Mączka & Lukasz Niedzwiecki, 2023. "Role of Experimental, Modeling, and Simulation Studies of Plasma in Sustainable Green Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-35, September.
    2. Hu, Mian & Laghari, Mahmood & Cui, Baihui & Xiao, Bo & Zhang, Beiping & Guo, Dabin, 2018. "Catalytic cracking of biomass tar over char supported nickel catalyst," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 228-237.
    3. He, Qing & Guo, Qinghua & Umeki, Kentaro & Ding, Lu & Wang, Fuchen & Yu, Guangsuo, 2021. "Soot formation during biomass gasification: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Ahsanullah Soomro & Shiyi Chen & Shiwei Ma & Wenguo Xiang, 2018. "Catalytic activities of nickel, dolomite, and olivine for tar removal and H2-enriched gas production in biomass gasification process," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(6), pages 839-867, September.
    5. Hervy, Maxime & Weiss-Hortala, Elsa & Pham Minh, Doan & Dib, Hadi & Villot, Audrey & Gérente, Claire & Berhanu, Sarah & Chesnaud, Anthony & Thorel, Alain & Le Coq, Laurence & Nzihou, Ange, 2019. "Reactivity and deactivation mechanisms of pyrolysis chars from bio-waste during catalytic cracking of tar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 487-499.
    6. Shen, Yafei & Zhao, Peitao & Shao, Qinfu & Takahashi, Fumitake & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2015. "In situ catalytic conversion of tar using rice husk char/ash supported nickel–iron catalysts for biomass pyrolytic gasification combined with the mixing-simulation in fluidized-bed gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 808-819.
    7. Zou, Xuehua & Chen, Tianhu & Zhang, Ping & Chen, Dong & He, Junkai & Dang, Yanliu & Ma, Zhiyuan & Chen, Ye & Toloueinia, Panteha & Zhu, Chengzhu & Xie, Jingjing & Liu, Haibo & Suib, Steven L., 2018. "High catalytic performance of Fe-Ni/Palygorskite in the steam reforming of toluene for hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 827-837.
    8. Qian, Kezhen & Kumar, Ajay & Zhang, Hailin & Bellmer, Danielle & Huhnke, Raymond, 2015. "Recent advances in utilization of biochar," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1055-1064.
    9. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Rakesh N, & Dasappa, S., 2018. "A critical assessment of tar generated during biomass gasification - Formation, evaluation, issues and mitigation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1045-1064.
    11. Vera Marcantonio & Michael Müller & Enrico Bocci, 2021. "A Review of Hot Gas Cleaning Techniques for Hydrogen Chloride Removal from Biomass-Derived Syngas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Cheng, Long & Wu, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Zhiguo & Guo, Changqing & Ellis, Naoko & Bi, Xiaotao & Paul Watkinson, A. & Grace, John R., 2020. "Tar elimination from biomass gasification syngas with bauxite residue derived catalysts and gasification char," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    13. Čespiva, Jakub & Wnukowski, Mateusz & Niedzwiecki, Lukasz & Skřínský, Jan & Vereš, Ján & Ochodek, Tadeáš & Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina & Borovec, Karel, 2020. "Characterization of tars from a novel, pilot scale, biomass gasifier working under low equivalence ratio regime," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 775-785.
    14. Nakamura, Shunsuke & Kitano, Shigeru & Yoshikawa, Kunio, 2016. "Biomass gasification process with the tar removal technologies utilizing bio-oil scrubber and char bed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 186-192.
    15. Guan, Guoqing & Kaewpanha, Malinee & Hao, Xiaogang & Abudula, Abuliti, 2016. "Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 450-461.
    16. Čespiva, J. & Skřínský, J. & Vereš, J. & Wnukowski, M. & Serenčíšová, J. & Ochodek, T., 2023. "Solid recovered fuel gasification in sliding bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    17. Cortazar, M. & Lopez, G. & Alvarez, J. & Amutio, M. & Bilbao, J. & Olazar, M., 2018. "Advantages of confining the fountain in a conical spouted bed reactor for biomass steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 455-463.
    18. Li, Jian & Tao, Junyu & Yan, Beibei & Jiao, Liguo & Chen, Guanyi & Hu, Jianli, 2021. "Review of microwave-based treatments of biomass gasification tar," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    19. Lee, Jechan & Kim, Ki-Hyun & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2017. "Biochar as a Catalyst," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-79.
    20. Zhang, Zhikun & Liu, Lina & Shen, Boxiong & Wu, Chunfei, 2018. "Preparation, modification and development of Ni-based catalysts for catalytic reforming of tar produced from biomass gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1086-1109.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5835-:d:1211844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.