IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i11p4490-d1162484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simultaneous Hydrogen and Ethanol Production from Crude Glycerol by a Microbial Consortium Using Fed-Batch Fermentation

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjeet Mehariya

    (Biotechnological Processes for Energy & Industry Laboratory (PBE), Department of Energy Technologies and Renewables, ENEA—Italian Agency for New Technologies and Renewable Source, 00123 Rome, Italy
    Current address: Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.)

  • Antonella Signorini

    (Biotechnological Processes for Energy & Industry Laboratory (PBE), Department of Energy Technologies and Renewables, ENEA—Italian Agency for New Technologies and Renewable Source, 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Antonella Marone

    (Biotechnological Processes for Energy & Industry Laboratory (PBE), Department of Energy Technologies and Renewables, ENEA—Italian Agency for New Technologies and Renewable Source, 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Silvia Rosa

    (Biotechnological Processes for Energy & Industry Laboratory (PBE), Department of Energy Technologies and Renewables, ENEA—Italian Agency for New Technologies and Renewable Source, 00123 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Simultaneous bioproduction of hydrogen and ethanol from cheaper waste feedstock has the potential for the development of a more cost-effective biofuel generation process. Crude glycerol (CG), a by-product of the biodiesel industry, is a renewable resource, abundant, sold at low prices and available worldwide. However, the main CG limitations in fermentation processes are mainly related to the presence of impurities and the lack of nitrogen sources, both acting on microbial activity. In this study, a fermentation process with CG was improved using a highly specific microbial consortium called GlyCeroL (GCL). The process was developed in fed-batch fermentation mode using not diluted substrate and carried out under non-sterile conditions and at increasing amounts of the substrate (from 20 to 80 gL −1 of glycerol). The results showed higher H 2 (from 6 to 8 LL −1 ) and EtOH (from 13 to 20 gL −1 ) production by increasing glycerol concentration from 20 to 40 gL −1 . On the other hand, a decrease in glycerol degradation efficiency (from 75 to 56%) was observed. Then, the nitrogen sparging strategy was applied. Using CG of 40 gL −1 , process improvement was achieved, leading to the increased production of hydrogen (10 LL −1 ) but not that of ethanol (20 gL −1 ). A further increase to 60 gL −1 of glycerol produced a slight increment of EtOH (21 gL −1 ) and H 2 (11 gL −1 ) but a sharp decrease in glycerol degradation efficiency (41%). Acetate, as the main impurity of CG, was an additional carbon source for GCL microorganisms contributing to EtOH production and increasing that of lactic acid to restore the redox balance. The Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) fingerprint at the end of all fed-batch fermentations supported the robustness of GCL functional units and their adaptability to fermentation conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjeet Mehariya & Antonella Signorini & Antonella Marone & Silvia Rosa, 2023. "Simultaneous Hydrogen and Ethanol Production from Crude Glycerol by a Microbial Consortium Using Fed-Batch Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4490-:d:1162484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sittijunda, Sureewan & Reungsang, Alissara, 2020. "Valorization of crude glycerol into hydrogen, 1,3-propanediol, and ethanol in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor under thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 361-372.
    2. Trchounian, Karen & Trchounian, Armen, 2015. "Hydrogen production from glycerol by Escherichia coli and other bacteria: An overview and perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 174-184.
    3. Rodrigues, Caroline Varella & Rios Alcaraz, Francisco Abraham & Nespeca, Maurílio Gustavo & Rodrigues, Aline Varella & Motteran, Fabrício & Tallarico Adorno, Maria Angela & Varesche, Maria Bernadete A, 2020. "Biohydrogen production in an integrated biosystem using crude glycerol from waste cooking oils," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 701-711.
    4. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2016. "Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 850-866.
    5. Marone, Antonella & Izzo, Giulio & Mentuccia, Luciano & Massini, Giulia & Paganin, Patrizia & Rosa, Silvia & Varrone, Cristiano & Signorini, Antonella, 2014. "Vegetable waste as substrate and source of suitable microflora for bio-hydrogen production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 6-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shah, A.T. & Favaro, L. & Alibardi, L. & Cagnin, L. & Sandon, A. & Cossu, R. & Casella, S. & Basaglia, M., 2016. "Bacillus sp. strains to produce bio-hydrogen from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 116-124.
    2. Trchounian, Karen & Sawers, R. Gary & Trchounian, Armen, 2017. "Improving biohydrogen productivity by microbial dark- and photo-fermentations: Novel data and future approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1201-1216.
    3. Wang, Chao & Liao, Mingzheng & Liang, Bo & Jiang, Zhiqiang & Zhong, Weilin & Chen, Ying & Luo, Xianglong & Shu, Riyang & Tian, Zhipeng & Lei, Libin, 2021. "Enhancement effect of catalyst support on indirect hydrogen production from propane partial oxidation towards commercial solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    4. Yoon, Kwangsuk & Lee, Sang Soo & Ok, Yong Sik & Kwon, Eilhann E. & Song, Hocheol, 2019. "Enhancement of syngas for H2 production via catalytic pyrolysis of orange peel using CO2 and bauxite residue," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    5. Barbara Uliasz-Misiak & Joanna Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska & Rafał Matuła & Radosław Tarkowski, 2022. "Prospects for the Implementation of Underground Hydrogen Storage in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Mostafa Ahmed & Mohamed Abdelrahem & Ibrahim Harbi & Ralph Kennel, 2020. "An Adaptive Model-Based MPPT Technique with Drift-Avoidance for Grid-Connected PV Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Qolipour, Mojtaba & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Tousi, Omid Mohseni, 2017. "Techno-economic feasibility of a photovoltaic-wind power plant construction for electric and hydrogen production: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 113-123.
    8. Azman, Nadia Farhana & Abdeshahian, Peyman & Kadier, Abudukeremu & Shukor, Hafiza & Al-Shorgani, Najeeb Kaid Nasser & Hamid, Aidil Abdul & Kalil, Mohd Sahaid, 2016. "Utilization of palm kernel cake as a renewable feedstock for fermentative hydrogen production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 700-708.
    9. María Pilar González-Vázquez & Roberto García & Covadonga Pevida & Fernando Rubiera, 2017. "Optimization of a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Plant for Low-Temperature Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Farboud Khatami & Erfan Goharian, 2022. "Beyond Profitable Shifts to Green Energies, towards Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Olabi, A.G. & Wilberforce, Tabbi & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2021. "Fuel cell application in the automotive industry and future perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    12. Jahangiri, Mehdi & Rezaei, Mostafa & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Goojani, Afsaneh Raiesi & Saghaei, Hamed & Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Jalaladdin & Hosseini Dehshiri, Seyyed Shahabaddin, 2022. "Prioritization of solar electricity and hydrogen co-production stations considering PV losses and different types of solar trackers: A TOPSIS approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 889-903.
    13. Zaffar Ahmed Shaikh & Polina Datsyuk & Laura M. Baitenova & Larisa Belinskaja & Natalia Ivolgina & Gulmira Rysmakhanova & Tomonobu Senjyu, 2022. "Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Renewable Energy Firm’s Profitability and Capitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Zhu, Min & Chen, Shiyi & Soomro, Ahsanullah & Hu, Jun & Sun, Zhao & Ma, Shiwei & Xiang, Wenguo, 2018. "Effects of supports on reduction activity and carbon deposition of iron oxide for methane chemical looping hydrogen generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 912-921.
    15. Malik, Ritu & Tomer, Vijay K., 2021. "State-of-the-art review of morphological advancements in graphitic carbon nitride (g-CN) for sustainable hydrogen production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    16. Lee, Boreum & Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Hyunjun & Byun, Manhee & Lim, Hankwon, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of H2 energy storage system based on renewable energy certificate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 91-98.
    17. Min Wang & Xiaobin Dong & Youchun Zhai, 2021. "Optimal Configuration of the Integrated Charging Station for PV and Hydrogen Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-12, October.
    18. Ye, Yang & Yue, Yi & Lu, Jianfeng & Ding, Jing & Wang, Weilong & Yan, Jinyue, 2021. "Enhanced hydrogen storage of a LaNi5 based reactor by using phase change materials," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 734-743.
    19. Tang, Xin-Yuan & Yang, Wei-Wei & Ma, Xu & Cao, Xiangkun Elvis, 2023. "An integrated modeling method for membrane reactors and optimization study of operating conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    20. Macedo, M. Salomé & Soria, M.A. & Madeira, Luis M., 2021. "Process intensification for hydrogen production through glycerol steam reforming," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4490-:d:1162484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.