IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i10p4009-d1143501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Power Demand Side Response Strategy: A Study Based on Double Master–Slave Game Model of Multi-Objective Multi-Universe Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Diandian Hu

    (School of Mathmatics and Physics, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

  • Tao Wang

    (School of Mathmatics and Physics, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Physics and Energy Technology, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, China)

Abstract

In the pilot provinces of China’s electricity spot market, power generation companies usually adopt the separate bidding mode, which leads to a low willingness of demand-side response and poor flexibility in the interaction mechanism between supply and demand. Based on the analysis of the demand response mechanism of the power day-ahead market with the participation of power sales companies, this paper abstracted the game process of the “power grid-sales company-users” tripartite competition in the electricity market environment into a two-layer (purchase layer/sales layer) game model and proposed a master–slave game equilibrium optimization strategy for the day-ahead power market under the two-layer game. The multi-objective multi-universe optimization algorithm was used to find the Pareto optimal solution of the game model, a comprehensive evaluation was constructed, and the optimal strategy of the demand response was determined considering the peak cutting and valley filling quantity of the power grid, the profit of the electricity retailers, the cost of the consumers, and the comfort degree. Examples are given to simulate the day-ahead electricity market participated in by the electricity retailers, analyze and compare the benefits of each market entity participating in the demand response, and verify the effectiveness of the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Diandian Hu & Tao Wang, 2023. "Optimizing Power Demand Side Response Strategy: A Study Based on Double Master–Slave Game Model of Multi-Objective Multi-Universe Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4009-:d:1143501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4009/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4009/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu, Qing & Lü, Shuaikang & Leng, Yajun, 2019. "A Nash-Stackelberg game approach in regional energy market considering users’ integrated demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 456-470.
    2. Wanlei Xue & Xin Zhao & Yan Li & Ying Mu & Haisheng Tan & Yixin Jia & Xuejie Wang & Huiru Zhao & Yihang Zhao, 2023. "Research on the Optimal Design of Seasonal Time-of-Use Tariff Based on the Price Elasticity of Electricity Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Motalleb, Mahdi & Siano, Pierluigi & Ghorbani, Reza, 2019. "Networked Stackelberg Competition in a Demand Response Market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 680-691.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Liu & Jinchun Chen & Chao Wang & Zhang Chen & Xinglei Liu, 2020. "Market Trading Model of Urban Energy Internet Based on Tripartite Game Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Sun, Bo & Li, Mingzhe & Wang, Fan & Xie, Jingdong, 2023. "An incentive mechanism to promote residential renewable energy consumption in China's electricity retail market: A two-level Stackelberg game approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    3. Wenting Zhao & Jun Lv & Xilong Yao & Juanjuan Zhao & Zhixin Jin & Yan Qiang & Zheng Che & Chunwu Wei, 2019. "Consortium Blockchain-Based Microgrid Market Transaction Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Peipei You & Sitao Li & Chengren Li & Chao Zhang & Hailang Zhou & Huicai Wang & Huiru Zhao & Yihang Zhao, 2023. "Price-Based Demand Response: A Three-Stage Monthly Time-of-Use Tariff Optimization Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Li, Ke & Ye, Ning & Li, Shuzhen & Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui, 2023. "Distributed collaborative operation strategies in multi-agent integrated energy system considering integrated demand response based on game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    6. Setya Budi, Rizki Firmansyah & Sarjiya, & Hadi, Sasongko Pramono, 2022. "Indonesia's deregulated generation expansion planning model based on mixed strategy game theory model for determining the optimal power purchase agreement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    7. Li, Jiamei & Ai, Qian & Yin, Shuangrui & Hao, Ran, 2022. "An aggregator-oriented hierarchical market mechanism for multi-type ancillary service provision based on the two-loop Stackelberg game," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    8. Dadashi, Mojtaba & Haghifam, Sara & Zare, Kazem & Haghifam, Mahmoud-Reza & Abapour, Mehdi, 2020. "Short-term scheduling of electricity retailers in the presence of Demand Response Aggregators: A two-stage stochastic Bi-Level programming approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Luan, Wenpeng & Tian, Longfei & Zhao, Bochao, 2023. "Leveraging hybrid probabilistic multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for dynamic tariff design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    10. Tang, Songlin & Zhou, Wenbing & Li, Xinjin & Chen, Yingchao & Zhang, Qian & Zhang, Xiliang, 2021. "Subsidy strategy for distributed photovoltaics: A combined view of cost change and economic development," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Perera, A.T.D. & Wang, Z. & Nik, Vahid M. & Scartezzini, Jean-Louis, 2021. "Towards realization of an Energy Internet: Designing distributed energy systems using game-theoretic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Zhu, Dafeng & Yang, Bo & Liu, Qi & Ma, Kai & Zhu, Shanying & Ma, Chengbin & Guan, Xinping, 2020. "Energy trading in microgrids for synergies among electricity, hydrogen and heat networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    13. Hakimi, Seyed Mehdi & Hasankhani, Arezoo & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2021. "Stochastic planning of a multi-microgrid considering integration of renewable energy resources and real-time electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    14. Zheng, Shunlin & Sun, Yi & Li, Bin & Qi, Bing & Zhang, Xudong & Li, Fei, 2021. "Incentive-based integrated demand response for multiple energy carriers under complex uncertainties and double coupling effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    15. Jiang, Aihua & Yuan, Huihong & Li, Delong, 2021. "Energy management for a community-level integrated energy system with photovoltaic prosumers based on bargaining theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    16. Ting Zhang & Shuaishuai Cao & Lingying Pan & Chenyu Zhou, 2020. "A Policy Effect Analysis of China’s Energy Storage Development Based on a Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-35, November.
    17. Qin, Yichen & Ng, Kam K.H., 2023. "Analysing the impact of collaborations between airlines and maintenance service company under MRO outsourcing mode: Perspective from airline's operations," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Yi Kuang & Xiuli Wang & Hongyang Zhao & Yijun Huang & Xianlong Chen & Xifan Wang, 2020. "Agent-Based Energy Sharing Mechanism Using Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Julio A. de Bitencourt & Daniel P. Bernardon & Henrique S. Eichkoff & Vinicius J. Garcia & Daiana W. Silva & Lucas M. Chiara & Renan L. B. Gomes & Sebastian A. Butto & Solange M. K. Barbosa & Alejandr, 2023. "An Alternative Regulation of Compensation Mechanisms for Electric Energy Transgressions of Service Quality Limits in Dispersed and Seasonal Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, July.
    20. Sobhani, Seyed Omid & Sheykhha, Siamak & Madlener, Reinhard, 2020. "An integrated two-level demand-side management game applied to smart energy hubs with storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:4009-:d:1143501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.