IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i16p5978-d891504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogas from Nitrogen-Rich Biomass as an Alternative to Animal Manure Co-Substrate in Anaerobic Co-Digestion Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Parralejo Alcobendas Ana Isabel

    (Instituto de Investigaciones Agrarias Finca La Orden-Valdesequera, CICYTEX, 06187 Guadajira, Spain)

  • Royano Barroso Luis

    (Instituto de Investigaciones Agrarias Finca La Orden-Valdesequera, CICYTEX, 06187 Guadajira, Spain)

  • Cabanillas Patilla Juan

    (Instituto de Investigaciones Agrarias Finca La Orden-Valdesequera, CICYTEX, 06187 Guadajira, Spain)

  • González Cortés Jerónimo

    (Instituto de Investigaciones Agrarias Finca La Orden-Valdesequera, CICYTEX, 06187 Guadajira, Spain)

Abstract

Nitrogen-rich biomass can be suitable for utilization as a substrate in anaerobic co-digestion (AC-D) instead of animal manure. This biomass combined with other substrates could replace animal waste in certain cases in which animal waste cannot be used to obtain methane gas. Methane is the majority component of the biogas produced in AC-D used as an energy source. In this research, a comparative study has been developed between leguminous plant biomass and pig manure in AC-D in a semicontinuous regime at different Organic Load Rate (OLR) values (1.2–1.8 g VS L D −1 d −1 ). The most elevated methane yield (494 NL CH 4 kg VS −1 ) belongs to assays developed with nitrogen-rich biomass at 1.4 g VS L D −1 d −1 . Methane-yield results of nitrogen-rich biomass are higher than pig manure results for all OLR studied values. The digestate obtained in the AC-D is a fertilizer of interest due to its nitrogen content and ability to save energy by replacing mineral fertilizers.

Suggested Citation

  • Parralejo Alcobendas Ana Isabel & Royano Barroso Luis & Cabanillas Patilla Juan & González Cortés Jerónimo, 2022. "Biogas from Nitrogen-Rich Biomass as an Alternative to Animal Manure Co-Substrate in Anaerobic Co-Digestion Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5978-:d:891504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5978/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5978/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dulatbay Yerassyl & Yu Jin & Sugirbaeva Zhanar & Kazambayeva Aigul & Yessengaliyeva Saltanat, 2022. "The Current Status and Lost Biogas Production Potential of Kazakhstan from Anaerobic Digestion of Livestock and Poultry Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Aakash Khadka & Anmol Parajuli & Sheila Dangol & Bijay Thapa & Lokesh Sapkota & Alessandro A. Carmona-Martínez & Anish Ghimire, 2022. "Effect of the Substrate to Inoculum Ratios on the Kinetics of Biogas Production during the Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ni, Ji-Qin, 2024. "A review of household and industrial anaerobic digestion in Asia: Biogas development and safety incidents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Yermek Abilmazhinov & Kapan Shakerkhan & Vladimir Meshechkin & Yerzhan Shayakhmetov & Nurzhan Nurgaliyev & Anuarbek Suychinov, 2023. "Mathematical Modeling for Evaluating the Sustainability of Biogas Generation through Anaerobic Digestion of Livestock Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Tomasz Kulupa & Adrianna Kubiak & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Krzysztof Pilarski & Alicja Niewiadomska, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste—A Short Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Alessandro A. Carmona-Martínez & Carmen Bartolomé & Clara A. Jarauta-Córdoba, 2023. "The Role of Biogas and Biomethane as Renewable Gases in the Decarbonization Pathway to Zero Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-3, August.
    5. Shitophyta Lukhi Mulia & Arnita Arnita & Wulansari Hilda Dyah Ana, 2023. "Evaluation and modelling of biogas production from batch anaerobic digestion of corn stover with oxalic acid," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(3), pages 151-157.
    6. Amal Babu Puthumana & Prasad Kaparaju, 2024. "Impact of Organic Load on Methane Yields and Kinetics during Anaerobic Digestion of Sugarcane Bagasse: Optimal Feed-to-Inoculum Ratio and Total Solids of Reactor Working Volume," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Amina Mohamed Ali & Md Alam Zahangir & Fatouma Mohamed Abdoul-Latif & Mohammed Saedi Jami & Jalludin Mohamed & Tarik Ainane, 2023. "Hydrolysis of Food Waste with Immobilized Biofilm as a Pretreatment Method for the Enhancement of Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. M. Devendran Manogaran & Mohd Hakimi & Mohammad Harith Nizam Basheer Ahmad & Rashid Shamsuddin & Jun Wei Lim & Muzamil Abdalla M Hassan & Nurul Tasnim Sahrin, 2023. "Effect of Temperature on Co-Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure and Empty Fruit Bunch: A Kinetic Parametric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, March.
    9. Józef Ciuła & Iwona Wiewiórska & Marian Banaś & Tadeusz Pająk & Piotr Szewczyk, 2023. "Balance and Energy Use of Biogas in Poland: Prospects and Directions of Development for the Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-12, May.
    10. Michele Ponzelli & Hiep Nguyen & Jörg E. Drewes & Konrad Koch, 2023. "Improved Recovery of Overloaded Anaerobic Batch Reactors by Graphene Oxide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Ephodia Sihlangu & Dibungi Luseba & Thierry Regnier & Primrose Magama & Idan Chiyanzu & Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe, 2024. "Investigating Methane, Carbon Dioxide, Ammonia, and Hydrogen Sulphide Content in Agricultural Waste during Biogas Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-29, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5978-:d:891504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.