IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i16p5913-d888644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Critical Drawdown Pressure of Sanding for Wellbore of Underground Gas Storage in a Depleted Gas Reservoir

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Song

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Ping Zhang

    (PipeChina West East Gas Pipeline Company, Shanghai 200120, China)

  • Xiaomin Tian

    (PipeChina West East Gas Pipeline Company, Shanghai 200120, China)

  • Famu Huang

    (PipeChina West East Gas Pipeline Company, Shanghai 200120, China)

  • Zhiwen Li

    (PipeChina West East Gas Pipeline Company, Shanghai 200120, China)

  • Jianjun Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China)

Abstract

Accurately predicting the critical differential pressure (CDP) of sand production contributes to improving the peak-shaving capacity and ensuring safe operation of underground gas storage (UGS). The CDP of sanding production in the target wells of the UGS was predicted coupling laboratory tests, inversed analysis with well logging data and numerical simulations. The in-situ mechanical properties of rock were estimated by coupling the laboratory test results and well-logging data. The in-situ stress field of the target formation was then deduced through inversed analysis coupled finite element method (FEM) and genetic algorithm (GA), based on the existing known stress data and the seismic data of the measured points. Using the critical strain limit (CSL) of 5‰ as the sanding criterion of the wellbore, the CDPs of the gas production in the UGS were predicted, which was 5.59 MPa, 3.98 MPa, and 4.01 MPa for well #1, well #2 and well #3, when the pressure of the gas storage was 30 MPa, respectively. The simulation results showed good agreements with the field-measured benchmark data of well #2 and well #3. The effects of moisture contents (ranging from 10 to ~40%), and cycling times of gas injection and withdrawal (ranging from 40 to ~200 cycling times) on the critical differential pressure were simulated and analyzed. The results indicated that the CDP decreased with an increase of the moisture content and the cycling times. This study provides a reliable tool for the sanding prediction of the wellbore in the UGS.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Song & Ping Zhang & Xiaomin Tian & Famu Huang & Zhiwen Li & Jianjun Liu, 2022. "Study on Critical Drawdown Pressure of Sanding for Wellbore of Underground Gas Storage in a Depleted Gas Reservoir," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5913-:d:888644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5913/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/5913/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesca Verga, 2018. "What’s Conventional and What’s Special in a Reservoir Study for Underground Gas Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Zuloaga, Pavel & Yu, Wei & Miao, Jijun & Sepehrnoori, Kamy, 2017. "Performance evaluation of CO2 Huff-n-Puff and continuous CO2 injection in tight oil reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 181-192.
    3. Song, Rui & Cui, Mengmeng & Liu, Jianjun, 2017. "Single and multiple objective optimization of a natural gas liquefaction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 19-28.
    4. Song, Rui & Liu, Jianjun & Yang, Chunhe & Sun, Shuyu, 2022. "Study on the multiphase heat and mass transfer mechanism in the dissociation of methane hydrate in reconstructed real-shape porous sediments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    5. Song, Rui & Sun, Shuyu & Liu, Jianjun & Yang, Chunhe, 2021. "Pore scale modeling on dissociation and transportation of methane hydrate in porous sediments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Ali, Aliyuda, 2021. "Data-driven based machine learning models for predicting the deliverability of underground natural gas storage in salt caverns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Song, Rui & Feng, Xiaoyu & Wang, Yao & Sun, Shuyu & Liu, Jianjun, 2021. "Dissociation and transport modeling of methane hydrate in core-scale sandy sediments: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Sang-Hyun Park & Kwang-Hyun Bang & Jong-Rae Cho, 2021. "Structural Integrity Evaluation of a Reactor Cavity during a Steam Explosion for External Reactor Vessel Cooling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-11, June.
    9. Siavash Honari & Ehsan Seyedi Hosseininia, 2021. "Particulate Modeling of Sand Production Using Coupled DEM-LBM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Song & Yaojiang Duan & Jianjun Liu & Yujia Song, 2022. "Numerical Modeling on Dissociation and Transportation of Natural Gas Hydrate Considering the Effects of the Geo-Stress," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Zhao, Xin & Geng, Qi & Zhang, Zhen & Qiu, Zhengsong & Fang, Qingchao & Wang, Zhiyuan & Yan, Chuanliang & Ma, Yongle & Li, Yang, 2023. "Phase change material microcapsules for smart temperature regulation of drilling fluids for gas hydrate reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    3. Rui Song & Yu Tang & Yao Wang & Ruiyang Xie & Jianjun Liu, 2022. "Pore-Scale Numerical Simulation of CO 2 –Oil Two-Phase Flow: A Multiple-Parameter Analysis Based on Phase-Field Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Song, Rui & Wang, Yao & Tang, Yu & Jiajun peng, & Liu, Jianjun & Yang, Chunhe, 2022. "3D Printing of natural sandstone at pore scale and comparative analysis on micro-structure and single/two-phase flow properties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    5. Liu, Qiang & Li, Jialong & Liang, Bing & Liu, Jianjun & Sun, Weiji & He, Jie & Lei, Yun, 2023. "Complex wettability behavior triggering mechanism on imbibition: A model construction and comparative study based on analysis at multiple scales," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    6. Song, Rui & Liu, Jianjun & Yang, Chunhe & Sun, Shuyu, 2022. "Study on the multiphase heat and mass transfer mechanism in the dissociation of methane hydrate in reconstructed real-shape porous sediments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    7. Ali, Aliyuda & Aliyuda, Kachalla & Elmitwally, Nouh & Muhammad Bello, Abdulwahab, 2022. "Towards more accurate and explainable supervised learning-based prediction of deliverability for underground natural gas storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    8. Song, Rui & Sun, Shuyu & Liu, Jianjun & Yang, Chunhe, 2021. "Pore scale modeling on dissociation and transportation of methane hydrate in porous sediments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    9. Wang, H.D. & Chen, Y. & Ma, G.W., 2020. "Effects of capillary pressures on two-phase flow of immiscible carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery in fractured media," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    10. Kou, Xuan & Feng, Jing-Chun & Li, Xiao-Sen & Wang, Yi & Chen, Zhao-Yang, 2022. "Visualization of interactions between depressurization-induced hydrate decomposition and heat/mass transfer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    11. Kun Qian & Shenglai Yang & Hongen Dou & Qian Wang & Lu Wang & Yu Huang, 2018. "Experimental Investigation on Microscopic Residual Oil Distribution During CO 2 Huff-and-Puff Process in Tight Oil Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Song, Rui & Feng, Xiaoyu & Wang, Yao & Sun, Shuyu & Liu, Jianjun, 2021. "Dissociation and transport modeling of methane hydrate in core-scale sandy sediments: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    13. Aslambakhsh, Amir Hamzeh & Moosavian, Mohammad Ali & Amidpour, Majid & Hosseini, Mohammad & AmirAfshar, Saeedeh, 2018. "Global cost optimization of a mini-scale liquefied natural gas plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1191-1200.
    14. Rahmad Syah & Seyed Mehdi Alizadeh & Karina Shamilyevna Nurgalieva & John William Grimaldo Guerrero & Mahyuddin K. M. Nasution & Afshin Davarpanah & Dadan Ramdan & Ahmed Sayed M. Metwally, 2021. "A Laboratory Approach to Measure Enhanced Gas Recovery from a Tight Gas Reservoir during Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Injection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    15. Cao, Xuewen & Yang, Jian & Zhang, Yue & Gao, Song & Bian, Jiang, 2022. "Process optimization, exergy and economic analysis of boil-off gas re-liquefaction processes for LNG carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    16. Junrong Liu & Lu Sun & Zunzhao Li & Xingru Wu, 2019. "Experimental Study on Reducing CO 2 –Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure with Hydrocarbon Agents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Mofid, Hossein & Jazayeri-Rad, Hooshang & Shahbazian, Mehdi & Fetanat, Abdolvahhab, 2019. "Enhancing the performance of a parallel nitrogen expansion liquefaction process (NELP) using the multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 286-303.
    18. Fengshuang Du & Bahareh Nojabaei, 2019. "A Review of Gas Injection in Shale Reservoirs: Enhanced Oil/Gas Recovery Approaches and Greenhouse Gas Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-33, June.
    19. Liu, Shuhan & Sun, Wenqiang, 2023. "Attention mechanism-aided data- and knowledge-driven soft sensors for predicting blast furnace gas generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    20. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Qadeer, Kinza & Minh, Le Quang & Haider, Junaid & Lee, Moonyong, 2019. "Nitrogen self-recuperation expansion-based process for offshore coproduction of liquefied natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, and pentane plus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 247-257.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:5913-:d:888644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.