IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i18p5898-d637641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon-Negative Scenarios in High CO 2 Gas Condensate Reservoirs

Author

Listed:
  • Lucija Jukić

    (Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Domagoj Vulin

    (Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Valentina Kružić

    (Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Maja Arnaut

    (Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

A gas condensate reservoir in Northern Croatia was used as an example of a CO 2 injection site during natural gas production to test whether the entire process is carbon-negative. To confirm this hypothesis, all three elements of the CO 2 life cycle were included: (1) CO 2 emitted by combustion of the produced gas from the start of production from the respective field, (2) CO 2 that is separated at natural gas processing plant, i.e., the CO 2 that was present in the original reservoir gas composition, and (3) the injected CO 2 volumes. The selected reservoir is typical of gas-condensate reservoirs in Northern Croatia (and more generally in Drava Basin), as it contains about 50% CO 2 (mole). Reservoir simulations of history-matched model showed base case (production without injection) and several cases of CO 2 enhanced gas recovery, but with a focus on CO 2 storage rather than maximizing hydrocarbon gas production achieved by converting a production well to a CO 2 injection well. General findings are that even in gas reservoirs with such extreme initial CO 2 content, gas production with CO 2 injection can be carbon-negative. In almost all simulated CO 2 injection scenarios, the process is carbon-negative from the time of CO 2 injection, and in scenarios where CO 2 injection begins earlier, it is carbon-negative from the start of gas production, which opens up the possibility of cost-effective storage of CO 2 while producing natural gas with net negative CO 2 emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucija Jukić & Domagoj Vulin & Valentina Kružić & Maja Arnaut, 2021. "Carbon-Negative Scenarios in High CO 2 Gas Condensate Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-11, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5898-:d:637641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5898/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/18/5898/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piotr F. Borowski, 2021. "Significance and Directions of Energy Development in African Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Johannes Full & Steffen Merseburg & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2021. "A New Perspective for Climate Change Mitigation—Introducing Carbon-Negative Hydrogen Production from Biomass with Carbon Capture and Storage (HyBECCS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Oldenburg, C.M & Stevens, S.H & Benson, S.M, 2004. "Economic feasibility of carbon sequestration with enhanced gas recovery (CSEGR)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1413-1422.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Full & Silja Hohmann & Sonja Ziehn & Edgar Gamero & Tobias Schließ & Hans-Peter Schmid & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2023. "Perspectives of Biogas Plants as BECCS Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Biomethane vs. Biohydrogen Production with Carbon Capture and Storage or Use (CCS/CCU)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Budzianowski, Wojciech Marcin, 2011. "Can ‘negative net CO2 emissions’ from decarbonised biogas-to-electricity contribute to solving Poland’s carbon capture and sequestration dilemmas?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6318-6325.
    3. Johannes Full & Mathias Trauner & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2021. "Carbon-Negative Hydrogen Production (HyBECCS) from Organic Waste Materials in Germany: How to Estimate Bioenergy and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Jakov Batelić & Karlo Griparić & Dario Matika, 2021. "Impact of Remediation-Based Maintenance on the Reliability of a Coal-Fired Power Plant Using Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Luo, Feng & Xu, Rui-Na & Jiang, Pei-Xue, 2013. "Numerical investigation of the influence of vertical permeability heterogeneity in stratified formation and of injection/production well perforation placement on CO2 geological storage with enhanced C," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1314-1323.
    6. Ma, Lei & Zhou, Lei & Mbadinga, Serge Maurice & Gu, Ji-Dong & Mu, Bo-Zhong, 2018. "Accelerated CO2 reduction to methane for energy by zero valent iron in oil reservoir production waters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 663-671.
    7. Mohsen Fallah Vostakola & Babak Salamatinia & Bahman Amini Horri, 2022. "A Review on Recent Progress in the Integrated Green Hydrogen Production Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, February.
    8. Singh, A.K. & Goerke, U.-J. & Kolditz, O., 2011. "Numerical simulation of non-isothermal compositional gas flow: Application to carbon dioxide injection into gas reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3446-3458.
    9. Patel, Milan J. & May, Eric F. & Johns, Michael L., 2016. "High-fidelity reservoir simulations of enhanced gas recovery with supercritical CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 548-559.
    10. Gheorghe Hurduzeu & Radu Lucian Pânzaru & Dragoș Mihai Medelete & Andi Ciobanu & Constanța Enea, 2022. "The Development of Sustainable Agriculture in EU Countries and the Potential Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals Specific Targets (SDG 2)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    11. Łukasz Jarosław Kozar & Adam Sulich, 2023. "Green Jobs in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Cui, Guodong & Pei, Shufeng & Rui, Zhenhua & Dou, Bin & Ning, Fulong & Wang, Jiaqiang, 2021. "Whole process analysis of geothermal exploitation and power generation from a depleted high-temperature gas reservoir by recycling CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Marco Ravina & Sergio Galletta & Augustin Dagbetin & Omama Ahmed Hussein Kamaleldin & Madalitso Mng’ombe & Lameck Mnyenyembe & Alemayehu Shanko & MariaChiara Zanetti, 2021. "Urban Wastewater Treatment in African Countries: Evidence from the Hydroaid Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Jo Tan & Guy Allinson & Yildiray Cinar, 2013. "A Techno-Economic Analysis of Coupling Enhanced Hydrocarbon Recovery and CO2 Storage in Gas Condensate Reservoirs," Energy and Environment Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(2), pages 1-73, December.
    15. Ioannis Dokas & Minas Panagiotidis & Stephanos Papadamou & Eleftherios Spyromitros, 2022. "The Determinants of Energy and Electricity Consumption in Developed and Developing Countries: International Evidence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-30, March.
    16. Adams, Benjamin M. & Kuehn, Thomas H. & Bielicki, Jeffrey M. & Randolph, Jimmy B. & Saar, Martin O., 2015. "A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 365-377.
    17. Cui, Guodong & Zhang, Liang & Ren, Bo & Enechukwu, Chioma & Liu, Yanmin & Ren, Shaoran, 2016. "Geothermal exploitation from depleted high temperature gas reservoirs via recycling supercritical CO2: Heat mining rate and salt precipitation effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 837-852.
    18. Michel Moreaux & Jean-Pierre Amigues & Gerard van der Meijden & Cees Withagen, "undated". "Carbon Capture: Storage vs. Utilization," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-041/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. McLaughlin, Hope & Littlefield, Anna A. & Menefee, Maia & Kinzer, Austin & Hull, Tobias & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Kim, Jinsoo & Griffiths, Steven, 2023. "Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    20. Julio, Alisson Aparecido Vitoriano & Castro-Amoedo, Rafael & Maréchal, François & González, Aldemar Martínez & Escobar Palacio, José Carlos, 2023. "Exergy and economic analysis of the trade-off for design of post-combustion CO2 capture plant by chemical absorption with MEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5898-:d:637641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.