IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i16p5086-d616910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Process of Developing New Services Using Uncertain Data

Author

Listed:
  • Ilona Skačkauskienė

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Povilas Švogžlys

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

The rapid changes in the services sector encourage companies to improve the processes for developing and delivering new services. An effective new service development process is not possible without planning. Business entities can plan their time, organise activities, and prioritise tasks according to the complexity or the total duration of the process. However, in the context of new service development, the planning aspect is still not sufficiently emphasised. It is noted that the aim is often to identify the factors that could reduce the duration of this process. However, there is a lack of relevant data based on certain expressions of time. The lack of such research limits the improvement of the planning processes for new service development projects. In order to evaluate the possibilities of application of the proposed new service development model for companies providing services, an empirical evaluation was conducted, using methods of expert survey, program evaluation and review, and Monte Carlo simulation. Guidelines for further research were formulated based on the obtained results.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilona Skačkauskienė & Povilas Švogžlys, 2021. "Improving the Process of Developing New Services Using Uncertain Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:5086-:d:616910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/5086/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/16/5086/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Sergius Koku, 2014. "Decision Making in Marketing and Finance," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-44477-6, September.
    2. Raine Mäntysalo & Jonna K. Kangasoja & Vesa Kanninen, 2015. "The paradox of strategic spatial planning: A theoretical outline with a view on Finland," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 169-183, June.
    3. Christos Vlachokostas, 2020. "Closing the Loop Between Energy Production and Waste Management: A Conceptual Approach Towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Kaustubh Dhargalkar & Kasturi Shinde & Yoshita Arora, 2016. "A universal new product development and upgradation framework," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Mario Rapaccini & Nicola Saccani & Giuditta Pezzotta & Thomas Burger & Walter Ganz, 2013. "Service development in product-service systems: a maturity model," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3-4), pages 300-319, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vlachokostas, Ch. & Michailidou, A.V. & Achillas, Ch., 2021. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy Management Strategies: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2021. "Sustainable Business Model in the Product-Service System: Analysis of Global Research and Associated EU Legislation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-33, September.
    3. Linus Thomson & Anmar Kamalaldin & David Sjödin & Vinit Parida, 2022. "A maturity framework for autonomous solutions in manufacturing firms: The interplay of technology, ecosystem, and business model," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 125-152, March.
    4. Vangelis Marinakis & Alexandros Flamos & Giorgos Stamtsis & Ioannis Georgizas & Yannis Maniatis & Haris Doukas, 2020. "The Efforts towards and Challenges of Greece’s Post-Lignite Era: The Case of Megalopolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Faegheh Amani Fard & Kirsikka Riekkinen & Havu Pellikka, 2023. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Land-Use Policies in Preventing the Risk of Coastal Flooding: Coastal Regions of Helsinki and Espoo," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Eduardo Oliveira, 2017. "Situated practices of strategic planning – an international perspective," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 351-354, February.
    7. Jouni Häkli & Kirsi Pauliina Kallio & Olli Ruokolainen, 2020. "A Missing Citizen? Issue Based Citizenship in City‐Regional Planning," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 876-893, September.
    8. Xiao Han & Menghan Zhang & Yixuan Hu & Yuan Huang, 2022. "Study on the Digital Transformation Capability of Cost Consultation Enterprises Based on Maturity Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Huikkola, Tuomas & Kohtamäki, Marko & Rabetino, Rodrigo & Makkonen, Hannu & Holtkamp, Philipp, 2022. "Overcoming the challenges of smart solution development: Co-alignment of processes, routines, and practices to manage product, service, and software integration," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    10. Diamantis, Vasileios & Eftaxias, Alexandros & Stamatelatou, Katerina & Noutsopoulos, Constantinos & Vlachokostas, Christos & Aivasidis, Alexandros, 2021. "Bioenergy in the era of circular economy: Anaerobic digestion technological solutions to produce biogas from lipid-rich wastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 438-447.
    11. Meiping Zhang & Yanqi Zhang & Jiajia Cui & Zongyao Zhang & Zaoxue Yan, 2022. "Biomass-Based Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysts from the Perspective of Ecological Aesthetics—Duckweed Has More Advantages than Soybean," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Mikulić, Josip & Vizek, Maruška & Stojčić, Nebojša & Payne, James E. & Čeh Časni, Anita & Barbić, Tajana, 2021. "The effect of tourism activity on housing affordability," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Oliveira, Eduardo & Meyfroidt, Patrick, 2021. "Strategic Spatial Planning in Emerging Land-Use Frontiers – Evidence from Mozambique," AfricArxiv t3anz, Center for Open Science.
    14. Bimal Kumar Sett & Bikash Koli Dey & Biswajit Sarkar, 2020. "The Effect of O2O Retail Service Quality in Supply Chain Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-36, October.
    15. Antti Wallin & Helena Leino & Ari Jokinen & Markus Laine & Johanna Tuomisaari & Pia Bäcklund, 2018. "A Polyphonic Story of Urban Densification," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(3), pages 40-51.
    16. Weronika Urbańska & Anna Janda & Magdalena Osial & Mateusz Słowikowski, 2023. "Sustainable Municipal Waste Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Case Study of Poland," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Hirschhorn, Fabio & Veeneman, Wijnand & van de Velde, Didier, 2019. "Organisation and performance of public transport: A systematic cross-case comparison of metropolitan areas in Europe, Australia, and Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 419-432.
    18. Mattila, Hanna & Heinilä, Aleksi, 2022. "Soft spaces, soft planning, soft law: Examining the institutionalisation of city-regional planning in Finland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Kleanthis Koupidis & Charalampos Bratsas & Christos Vlachokostas, 2022. "OpΕnergy: An Intelligent System for Monitoring EU Energy Strategy Using EU Open Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:5086-:d:616910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.