IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i12p3478-d573521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Boil-off Gas (BOG) Minimization and Recovery Strategies from Actual Baseload LNG Export Terminal: Towards Sustainable LNG Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Zineb Bouabidi

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
    Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd., Singapore 119077, Singapore)

  • Fares Almomani

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Easa I. Al-musleh

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Mary A. Katebah

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Mohamed M. Hussein

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Abdur Rahman Shazed

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Iftekhar A. Karimi

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
    Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd., Singapore 119077, Singapore)

  • Hassan Alfadala

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

Abstract

Boil-off Gas (BOG) generated at the liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal causes negative economic and environmental impacts. Thus, the objective of this study is to develop and evaluate various handling schemes to minimize and/or recover the generated BOG from an actual baseload LNG export terminal with a capacity of 554 million standard cubic feet per day (MMSCFD) of natural gas feed. The following three main scenarios were assessed: JBOG re-liquefaction, LNG sub-cooling, and lean fuel gas (LFG) reflux. For the LNG subcooling, two sub-cases were considered; standalone subcooling before LNG storage and subcooling in the prevailing liquefaction cycle. Steady-state models for these scenarios were simulated using Aspen Plus ® based on a shortcut approach to quickly evaluate the proposed scenarios and determine the promising options that should be considered for further rigorous analysis. Results indicated that the flow of attainable excess LNG is 0.07, 0.03, and 0.022 million metric tons per annum (MTA) for the standalone LNG sub-cooling, LNG sub-cooling in the main cryogenic heat exchanger (MCHE), and both LFG-refluxing and jetty boil-off gas (JBOG) liquefaction, respectively. This in turn results in a profit of 24.58, 12.24, 8.14, and 7.63 million $/year for the LNG price of 7$ per Metric Million British Thermal Unit (MMBtu) of LNG.

Suggested Citation

  • Zineb Bouabidi & Fares Almomani & Easa I. Al-musleh & Mary A. Katebah & Mohamed M. Hussein & Abdur Rahman Shazed & Iftekhar A. Karimi & Hassan Alfadala, 2021. "Study on Boil-off Gas (BOG) Minimization and Recovery Strategies from Actual Baseload LNG Export Terminal: Towards Sustainable LNG Chains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3478-:d:573521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Satish & Kwon, Hyouk-Tae & Choi, Kwang-Ho & Lim, Wonsub & Cho, Jae Hyun & Tak, Kyungjae & Moon, Il, 2011. "LNG: An eco-friendly cryogenic fuel for sustainable development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4264-4273.
    2. Kurle, Yogesh M. & Wang, Sujing & Xu, Qiang, 2015. "Simulation study on boil-off gas minimization and recovery strategies at LNG exporting terminals," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 628-641.
    3. Kwak, Dong-Hun & Heo, Jeong-Ho & Park, Seung-Ha & Seo, Seok-Jang & Kim, Jin-Kuk, 2018. "Energy-efficient design and optimization of boil-off gas (BOG) re-liquefaction process for liquefied natural gas (LNG)-fuelled ship," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 915-929.
    4. Kakaee, Amir-Hasan & Paykani, Amin, 2013. "Research and development of natural-gas fueled engines in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 805-821.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyun-Seung Kim & Churl-Hee Cho, 2022. "An Economical Boil-Off Gas Management System for LNG Refueling Stations: Evaluation Using Scenario Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Katebah, Mary A. & Hussein, Mohamed M. & Al-musleh, Easa I. & Almomani, Fares, 2023. "A systematic optimization approach of an actual LNG plant: Power savings and enhanced process economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    3. Xiang Bao & Yuefeng Liu & Bo Liu & Haofeng Liu & Yue Wang, 2023. "Multi-State Online Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Multi-Task Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duan, Zhongdi & Wang, Jianhu & Yuan, Yuchao & Tang, Wenyong & Xue, Hongxiang, 2023. "Near-wall thermal regulation for cryogenic storage by adsorbent coating: Modelling and pore-scale investigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    2. Wang, Cheng & Ju, Yonglin & Fu, Yunzhun, 2021. "Comparative life cycle cost analysis of low pressure fuel gas supply systems for LNG fueled ships," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Pospíšil, Jiří & Charvát, Pavel & Arsenyeva, Olga & Klimeš, Lubomír & Špiláček, Michal & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2019. "Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-15.
    4. Bian, Jiang & Yang, Jian & Liu, Yang & Li, Yuxing & Cao, Xuewen, 2022. "Analysis and efficiency enhancement for energy-saving re-liquefaction processes of boil-off gas without external refrigeration cycle on LNG carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    5. Osorio-Tejada, Jose Luis & Llera-Sastresa, Eva & Scarpellini, Sabina, 2017. "Liquefied natural gas: Could it be a reliable option for road freight transport in the EU?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 785-795.
    6. Tang, Changlong & Hu, Fan & Zhou, Xiaoguang & Li, Yajun, 2022. "Optimization methods for flexibility and stability related to the operation of LNG receiving terminals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    7. Bilgili, Levent, 2023. "A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    8. Keuntae Lee & Deuk-Yong Koh & Junseok Ko & Hankil Yeom & Chang-Hyo Son & Jung-In Yoon, 2020. "Design and Performance Test of 2 kW Class Reverse Brayton Cryogenic System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
    9. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Johannes Full & Silja Hohmann & Sonja Ziehn & Edgar Gamero & Tobias Schließ & Hans-Peter Schmid & Robert Miehe & Alexander Sauer, 2023. "Perspectives of Biogas Plants as BECCS Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Biomethane vs. Biohydrogen Production with Carbon Capture and Storage or Use (CCS/CCU)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Mohd Shariq Khan & Muhammad Abdul Qyyum & Wahid Ali & Aref Wazwaz & Khursheed B. Ansari & Moonyong Lee, 2020. "Energy Saving through Efficient BOG Prediction and Impact of Static Boil-off-Rate in Full Containment-Type LNG Storage Tank," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Cao, Xuewen & Yang, Jian & Zhang, Yue & Gao, Song & Bian, Jiang, 2022. "Process optimization, exergy and economic analysis of boil-off gas re-liquefaction processes for LNG carriers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    13. Duan, Zhongdi & Ren, Tao & Ding, Guoliang & Chen, Jie & Mi, Xiaoguang, 2017. "Liquid-migration based model for predicting the thermal performance of spiral wound heat exchanger for floating LNG," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 972-982.
    14. Kadhim, Hakim T. & Rona, Aldo, 2018. "Off-design performance of a liquefied natural gas plant with an axial turbine of novel endwall design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 830-839.
    15. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Kim, Jeongdong & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2020. "Advanced integration of LNG regasification power plant with liquid air energy storage: Enhancements in flexibility, safety, and power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    16. Lu, Yilin & Xu, Jingxuan & Chen, Xi & Tian, Yafen & Zhang, Hua, 2023. "Design and thermodynamic analysis of an advanced liquid air energy storage system coupled with LNG cold energy, ORCs and natural resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    17. Yude Shao & Yoonhyeok Lee & Hokeun Kang, 2019. "Dynamic Optimization of Boil-Off Gas Generation for Different Time Limits in Liquid Natural Gas Bunkering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Atienza-Márquez, Antonio & Bruno, Joan Carles & Akisawa, Atsushi & Coronas, Alberto, 2019. "Performance analysis of a combined cold and power (CCP) system with exergy recovery from LNG-regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 448-461.
    19. Chen, Bingbing & Sun, Huiru & Zhou, Hang & Yang, Mingjun & Wang, Dayong, 2019. "Effects of pressure and sea water flow on natural gas hydrate production characteristics in marine sediment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 274-283.
    20. Hao, Han & Liu, Zongwei & Zhao, Fuquan & Li, Weiqi, 2016. "Natural gas as vehicle fuel in China: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 521-533.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3478-:d:573521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.