IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i19p5049-d419436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Method for Impeller Inlet Design of Supercritical CO 2 Centrifugal Compressors in Brayton Cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojian Li

    (Department of Mechanics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Yijia Zhao

    (Department of Mechanics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Huadong Yao

    (Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Ming Zhao

    (Department of Mechanics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Zhengxian Liu

    (Department of Mechanics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (SCO 2 ) is considered as a potential working fluid in next generation power and energy systems. The SCO 2 Brayton cycle is advantaged with higher cycle efficiency, smaller compression work, and more compact layout, as compared with traditional cycles. When the inlet total condition of the compressor approaches the critical point of the working fluid, the cycle efficiency is further enhanced. However, the flow acceleration near the impeller inducer causes the fluid to enter two-phase region, which may lead to additional aerodynamic losses and flow instability. In this study, a new impeller inlet design method is proposed to achieve a better balance among the cycle efficiency, compressor compactness, and inducer condensation. This approach couples a concept of the maximum swallowing capacity of real gas and a new principle for condensation design. Firstly, the mass flow function of real gas centrifugal compressors is analytically expressed by non-dimensional parameters. An optimal inlet flow angle is derived to achieve the maximum swallowing capacity under a certain inlet relative Mach number, which leads to the minimum energy loss and a more compact geometry for the compressor. Secondly, a new condensation design principle is developed by proposing a novel concept of the two-zone inlet total condition for SCO 2 compressors. In this new principle, the acceptable acceleration margin (AAM) is derived as a criterion to limit the impeller inlet condensation. The present inlet design method is validated in the design and simulation of a low-flow-coefficient compressor stage based on the real gas model. The mechanisms of flow accelerations in the impeller inducer, which form low-pressure regions and further produce condensation, are analyzed and clarified under different operating conditions. It is found that the proposed method is efficient to limit the condensation in the impeller inducer, keep the compactness of the compressor, and maintain a high cycle efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojian Li & Yijia Zhao & Huadong Yao & Ming Zhao & Zhengxian Liu, 2020. "A New Method for Impeller Inlet Design of Supercritical CO 2 Centrifugal Compressors in Brayton Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5049-:d:419436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5049/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/19/5049/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pim Nederstigt & Rene Pecnik, 2023. "Generalised Isentropic Relations in Thermodynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Marco Bicchi & Michele Marconcini & Ernani Fulvio Bellobuono & Elisabetta Belardini & Lorenzo Toni & Andrea Arnone, 2023. "Multi-Point Surrogate-Based Approach for Assessing Impacts of Geometric Variations on Centrifugal Compressor Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Liang, Ting & Vecchi, Andrea & Knobloch, Kai & Sciacovelli, Adriano & Engelbrecht, Kurt & Li, Yongliang & Ding, Yulong, 2022. "Key components for Carnot Battery: Technology review, technical barriers and selection criteria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:19:p:5049-:d:419436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.