IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i18p3570-d268434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

DAG-Based Distributed Ledger for Low-Latency Smart Grid Network

Author

Listed:
  • Seongjoon Park

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Hwangnam Kim

    (School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a scheme that implements a Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) based on Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) to generate, validate, and confirm the electricity transaction in Smart Grid. The convergence of the Smart Grid and distributed ledger concept has recently been introduced. Since Smart Grids require a distributed network architecture for power distribution and trading, the Distributed Ledger-based Smart Grid design is a spotlighted research domain. However, only the Blockchain-based methods, which are a type of the distributed ledger scheme, are currently either being considered or adopted in the Smart Grid. Due to computation-intensive consensus schemes such as Proof-of-Work and discrete block generation, Blockchain-based distributed ledger systems suffer from efficiency and latency issues. We propose a DAG-based distributed ledger for Smart Grids, called PowerGraph, to resolve this problem. Since a DAG-based distributed ledger does not need to generate blocks for confirmation, each transaction of the PowerGraph undergoes the validation and confirmation process individually. In addition, transactions in PowerGraph are used to keep track of the energy trade and include various types of transactions so that they can fully encompass the events in the Smart Grid network. Finally, to ensure that PowerGraph maintains a high performance, we modeled the PowerGraph performance and proposed a novel consensus algorithm that would result in the rapid confirmation of transactions. We use numerical evaluations to show that PowerGraph can accelerate the transaction processing speed by over 5 times compared to existing DAG-based DLT system.

Suggested Citation

  • Seongjoon Park & Hwangnam Kim, 2019. "DAG-Based Distributed Ledger for Low-Latency Smart Grid Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3570-:d:268434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3570/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3570/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juhar Abdella & Khaled Shuaib, 2018. "Peer to Peer Distributed Energy Trading in Smart Grids: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Bae, Mungyu & Kim, Hwantae & Kim, Eugene & Chung, Albert Yongjoon & Kim, Hwangnam & Roh, Jae Hyung, 2014. "Toward electricity retail competition: Survey and case study on technical infrastructure for advanced electricity market system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 252-273.
    3. Seong-Kyu Kim & Jun-Ho Huh, 2018. "A Study on the Improvement of Smart Grid Security Performance and Blockchain Smart Grid Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiuli Wang & Fang Yao & Fushuan Wen, 2022. "Applications of Blockchain Technology in Modern Power Systems: A Brief Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Hamzah Khan & Tariq Masood, 2022. "Impact of Blockchain Technology on Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Nishant Sapra & Imlak Shaikh & Ashutosh Dash, 2023. "Impact of Proof of Work (PoW)-Based Blockchain Applications on the Environment: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-29, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gangjun Gong & Zhening Zhang & Xinyu Zhang & Nawaraj Kumar Mahato & Lin Liu & Chang Su & Haixia Yang, 2020. "Electric Power System Operation Mechanism with Energy Routers Based on QoS Index under Blockchain Architecture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Aneesh A. Chand & Maria Malvoni & Kushal A. Prasad & Kabir A. Mamun & F.R. Islam & Shauhrat S. Chopra, 2020. "Distributed Energy Resources and the Application of AI, IoT, and Blockchain in Smart Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-42, November.
    3. Yongxiu He & Meiyan Wang & Jinxiong Yu & Qing He & Huijun Sun & Fengyu Su, 2020. "Research on the Hybrid Recommendation Method of Retail Electricity Price Package Based on Power User Characteristics and Multi-Attribute Utility in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Pablo Baez-Gonzalez & Felix Garcia-Torres & Miguel A. Ridao & Carlos Bordons, 2020. "A Stochastic MPC Based Energy Management System for Simultaneous Participation in Continuous and Discrete Prosumer-to-Prosumer Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Tseng, Fang-Mei & Palma Gil, Eunice Ina N. & Lu, Louis Y.Y., 2021. "Developmental trajectories of blockchain research and its major subfields," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Jelena Lukić & Miloš Radenković & Marijana Despotović-Zrakić & Aleksandra Labus & Zorica Bogdanović, 2017. "Supply chain intelligence for electricity markets: A smart grid perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 91-107, February.
    7. Samende, Cephas & Cao, Jun & Fan, Zhong, 2022. "Multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm for peer-to-peer energy trading considering distribution network constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    8. Alessandra Chiarini & Lorenzo Compagnucci, 2022. "Blockchain, Data Protection and P2P Energy Trading: A Review on Legal and Economic Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Uyikumhe Damisa & Nnamdi I. Nwulu & Pierluigi Siano, 2022. "Towards Blockchain-Based Energy Trading: A Smart Contract Implementation of Energy Double Auction and Spinning Reserve Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Jun-Ho Huh & Seong-Kyu Kim, 2019. "The Blockchain Consensus Algorithm for Viable Management of New and Renewable Energies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Sen Guo & Wenyue Zhang & Xiao Gao, 2020. "Business Risk Evaluation of Electricity Retail Company in China Using a Hybrid MCDM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Fatih Cemil Ozbugday & Onder Ozgur, 2018. "Advanced Metering Infrastructure and Distributed Generation: Panel Causality Evidence from New Zealand," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 125-137.
    13. Bandeiras, F. & Pinheiro, E. & Gomes, M. & Coelho, P. & Fernandes, J., 2020. "Review of the cooperation and operation of microgrid clusters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Christie Etukudor & Benoit Couraud & Valentin Robu & Wolf-Gerrit Früh & David Flynn & Chinonso Okereke, 2020. "Automated Negotiation for Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading in Local Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Felipe Condon Silva & Mohamed A. Ahmed & José Manuel Martínez & Young-Chon Kim, 2019. "Design and Implementation of a Blockchain-Based Energy Trading Platform for Electric Vehicles in Smart Campus Parking Lots," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Ioannis P. Panapakidis & Nikolaos Koltsaklis & Georgios C. Christoforidis, 2020. "A Novel Integrated Profit Maximization Model for Retailers under Varied Penetration Levels of Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27, December.
    17. Consolación Quintana-Rojo & Fernando-Evaristo Callejas-Albiñana & Miguel-Ángel Tarancón & Isabel Martínez-Rodríguez, 2020. "Econometric Studies on the Development of Renewable Energy Sources to Support the European Union 2020–2030 Climate and Energy Framework: A Critical Appraisal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
    18. Fotouhi Ghazvini, Mohammad Ali & Ramos, Sergio & Soares, João & Castro, Rui & Vale, Zita, 2019. "Liberalization and customer behavior in the Portuguese residential retail electricity market," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Meritxell Domènech Monfort & César De Jesús & Natapon Wanapinit & Niklas Hartmann, 2022. "A Review of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading with Standard Terminology Proposal and a Techno-Economic Characterisation Matrix," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-29, November.
    20. Radenković, Miloš & Bogdanović, Zorica & Despotović-Zrakić, Marijana & Labus, Aleksandra & Lazarević, Saša, 2020. "Assessing consumer readiness for participation in IoT-based demand response business models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3570-:d:268434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.