IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i7p999-d104652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a Multiobjective Approach to Compare Multiple Design Alternatives—An Application to Battery Dynamic Model Tuning

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Pajares

    (Instituto Universitario de Automática e Informática Industrial (ai2), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera s/n, 46022 València, Spain)

  • Xavier Blasco

    (Instituto Universitario de Automática e Informática Industrial (ai2), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera s/n, 46022 València, Spain)

  • Juan Manuel Herrero

    (Instituto Universitario de Automática e Informática Industrial (ai2), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera s/n, 46022 València, Spain)

  • Raúl Simarro

    (Instituto Universitario de Automática e Informática Industrial (ai2), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera s/n, 46022 València, Spain)

Abstract

A design problem is usually solvable in different ways or by design alternatives. In this work, the term “concept” is used to refer to the design alternatives. Additionally, it is quite common that a design problem has to satisfy conflicting objectives. In these cases, the design problem can be formulated as a multiobjective optimization problem (MOP). One of the aims of this work was to show how to combine multiobjective requirements with concepts’ comparisons, in order to attain a satisfactory design. The second aim of this work was to take advantage of this methodology to obtain a battery model that described the dynamic behavior of the main electrical variables. Two objectives related to the model accuracy during the charge and discharge processes were used. In the final model selection, three different concepts were compared. These concepts differed in the complexity of their model structure. More complex models usually provide a good approximation of the process when identification data are used, but the approximation could be worse when validation data are applied. In this article, it is shown that a model with an intermediate complexity supplies a good approximation for both identification and validation data sets.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Pajares & Xavier Blasco & Juan Manuel Herrero & Raúl Simarro, 2017. "Using a Multiobjective Approach to Compare Multiple Design Alternatives—An Application to Battery Dynamic Model Tuning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:999-:d:104652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/999/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/999/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ming-Hui Chang & Han-Pang Huang & Shu-Wei Chang, 2013. "A New State of Charge Estimation Method for LiFePO 4 Battery Packs Used in Robots," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. F. Isorna Llerena & E. López González & J. J. Caparrós Mancera & F. Segura Manzano & J. M. Andújar, 2021. "Hydrogen vs. Battery-Based Propulsion Systems in Unipersonal Vehicles—Developing Solutions to Improve the Sustainability of Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Hu, Xiaosong & Feng, Fei & Liu, Kailong & Zhang, Lei & Xie, Jiale & Liu, Bo, 2019. "State estimation for advanced battery management: Key challenges and future trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Van Quan Dao & Minh-Chau Dinh & Chang Soon Kim & Minwon Park & Chil-Hoon Doh & Jeong Hyo Bae & Myung-Kwan Lee & Jianyong Liu & Zhiguo Bai, 2021. "Design of an Effective State of Charge Estimation Method for a Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Using Extended Kalman Filter and Artificial Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Nimalsiri, Nanduni I. & Ratnam, Elizabeth L. & Mediwaththe, Chathurika P. & Smith, David B. & Halgamuge, Saman K., 2021. "Coordinated charging and discharging control of electric vehicles to manage supply voltages in distribution networks: Assessing the customer benefit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    5. Shyh-Chin Huang & Kuo-Hsin Tseng & Jin-Wei Liang & Chung-Liang Chang & Michael G. Pecht, 2017. "An Online SOC and SOH Estimation Model for Lithium-Ion Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Fathy, Ahmed & Ferahtia, Seydali & Rezk, Hegazy & Yousri, Dalia & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Olabi, A.G., 2022. "Optimal adaptive fuzzy management strategy for fuel cell-based DC microgrid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Nicolás Müller & Samir Kouro & Pericle Zanchetta & Patrick Wheeler & Gustavo Bittner & Francesco Girardi, 2019. "Energy Storage Sizing Strategy for Grid-Tied PV Plants under Power Clipping Limitations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Javidsharifi, Mahshid & Niknam, Taher & Aghaei, Jamshid & Mokryani, Geev, 2018. "Multi-objective short-term scheduling of a renewable-based microgrid in the presence of tidal resources and storage devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 367-381.
    9. Hannan, M.A. & Lipu, M.S.H. & Hussain, A. & Mohamed, A., 2017. "A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: Challenges and recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 834-854.
    10. Angelo Maiorino & Adrián Mota-Babiloni & Fabio Petruzziello & Manuel Gesù Del Duca & Andrea Ariano & Ciro Aprea, 2022. "A Comprehensive Energy Model for an Optimal Design of a Hybrid Refrigerated Van," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Saleh Mohammed Shahriar & Erphan A. Bhuiyan & Md. Nahiduzzaman & Mominul Ahsan & Julfikar Haider, 2022. "State of Charge Estimation for Electric Vehicle Battery Management Systems Using the Hybrid Recurrent Learning Approach with Explainable Artificial Intelligence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Bharatiraja Chokkalingam & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban & Pierluigi Siano & Ramesh Krishnamoorthy & Raghu Selvaraj, 2017. "Real-Time Forecasting of EV Charging Station Scheduling for Smart Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Jaime de la Peña Llerandi & Carlos Sancho de Mingo & José Carpio Ibáñez, 2019. "Continuous Battery Health Diagnosis by On-Line Internal Resistance Measuring," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Yuechen Liu & Linjing Zhang & Jiuchun Jiang & Shaoyuan Wei & Sijia Liu & Weige Zhang, 2017. "A Data-Driven Learning-Based Continuous-Time Estimation and Simulation Method for Energy Efficiency and Coulombic Efficiency of Lithium Ion Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Mona Faraji Niri & Koorosh Aslansefat & Sajedeh Haghi & Mojgan Hashemian & Rüdiger Daub & James Marco, 2023. "A Review of the Applications of Explainable Machine Learning for Lithium–Ion Batteries: From Production to State and Performance Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-38, September.
    16. Rahman, Ashikur & Lin, Xianke, 2022. "Li-ion battery individual electrode state of charge and degradation monitoring using battery casing through auto curve matching for standard CCCV charging profile," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    17. Shahid Hussain & Mohamed A. Ahmed & Ki-Beom Lee & Young-Chon Kim, 2020. "Fuzzy Logic Weight Based Charging Scheme for Optimal Distribution of Charging Power among Electric Vehicles in a Parking Lot," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    18. Zhang, Cheng & Allafi, Walid & Dinh, Quang & Ascencio, Pedro & Marco, James, 2018. "Online estimation of battery equivalent circuit model parameters and state of charge using decoupled least squares technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 678-688.
    19. Saeed Sepasi & Leon R. Roose & Marc M. Matsuura, 2015. "Extended Kalman Filter with a Fuzzy Method for Accurate Battery Pack State of Charge Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Nicolae Tudoroiu & Mohammed Zaheeruddin & Roxana-Elena Tudoroiu, 2020. "Real Time Design and Implementation of State of Charge Estimators for a Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Cobalt Battery with Applicability in HEVs/EVs—A Comparative Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-45, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:999-:d:104652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.